Contribution of drought on variability in crop yields and physiochemical responses of selected Rapeseed/mustard genotypes
Paper Details
Contribution of drought on variability in crop yields and physiochemical responses of selected Rapeseed/mustard genotypes
Abstract
To identify the drought-tolerant Rapeseed-mustard genotype based on physiochemical responses an experiment was carried out from November 2017 to February 2018. The experiment was designed in Randomized Complete Block (RCB) with three replications including the treatments of factor A: irrigation regimes viz. T1 = irrigation (control) and T2 = drought (no irrigation) and factor B: five genotypes/varieties viz. V1 = BC-9909, V2 = BJDH-05, V3 = Nap-0544, V4 = BARI Sharisha-11, and V5 = BARI Sharisha-16. Irrespective of genotypes/varieties, drought stress greatly fluctuated the all physiochemical, yield contributing and yield parameters. Based on physicochemical parameters like accumulation of chlorophyll, enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant; Nap-0544 was found to be a drought-tolerant genotype due to its greater and lower accumulation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant respectively (greater CAT, POD, APX, proline and lower MDA) under drought stress. This genotype may be further explored to characterize its genes and mechanisms against drought stress for increased Rapeseed-mustard production and way of developing the drought-tolerant varieties.
Ali S, Liu Y, Ishaq M, Shah T, Ilyas A, Din IU. 2017. Climate change and its impact on the yield of major food crops: Evidence from Pakistan. Foods 6(6), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods6060039.
Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1), 1-15.
Badr A, Shazly HHE, Tarawneh RA, Börner A. 2020. Screening for drought tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm using germination and seedling traits under simulated drought Conditions. Plants 9(5), 565. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9050565
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, 205- 207.
Biswas PK, Ferdous LJ, Roy TS, Masum SM. 2019. Performance of rapeseed and mustard with different planting techniques. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 22(1), 79-88.
Çakir R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of Corn. Field Crops Research 89, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005
Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW. Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004
Chen F, Wang F, Wu FB, Mao WH, Zhang GP. 2010. Modulation of exogenous glutathione in antioxidant defense system against Cd stress in the two barley genotypes differing in Cd tolerance. Plant Physiology Biochemistry 48, 663-672. PubMed: 20605723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.05.001.
Eck HV, Mathers AC, Musick JT. 1987. Plant water stress at various growth stages and growth and yield of Soybeans. Field Crops Research 17, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(87)90077-3.
Garg N, Manchanda G. 2009. ROS generation in plants: boon or bane? Plant Biosystems 143, 8-96.
Gill SS. Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48(12), 909-930.
Gomez AA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedure of Agricultural Research. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Haque MS, Saha NR, Islam MT. 2020. Screening for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes by morphological and SSR markers. Journal of crop science and biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00036-7
Lin C, Kao C. 2002. Osmotic stress-induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide level in roots of rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation 37(2), 177-184.
Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. 2010. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environment 33, 453–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
Nahar S, Vemireddy LR, Sahoo L, Tanti B, 2018. Antioxidant Protection Mechanisms Reveal Significant Response in Drought-Induced Oxidative Stress in Some Traditional Rice of Assam, India, Rice Science 25(4), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.06.002
Narayanan S, Ruma D, Gitika B, Sharma SK, Pauline T, Ram MS, Ilavazhagan G, Sawhney RC, Kumarand D, Banerjee PK. 2005. Antioxidant activities of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) during hypoxia induced oxidative stress in glial cells. Molecular and cellular biochemistry 278, 9- 14.
Ommen OE, Donnelly A, Vanhoutvin S, Mvan O, Manderscheid R. 1999. Chlorophyll content of spring wheat fag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and other environmental stresses within the ‘espace-wheat’ project. European Journal of Agronomy 10, 197–203.
Oneto CD. 2016. Water defcit stress tolerance in maize conferred by expression of an isopentenyltransferase (IPT) gene driven by a stress-and maturation-induced promoter. Journal of Biotechnology 220, 66–77.
Oweis T, Hachum A, Pala M. 2004. Lentil production under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management Journal 68(3), 251-265.
Penna JCV, Verhalen LM, Kirkham MB, McNew RW. 1998. Screening cotton genotypes for seedling drought tolerance. Genetics and Molecular Biology 21, 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S141547571998000400023
Pervin MS, Halder T, Khalequzzaman M, Kader MA, Aditya TL, Yasmeen R. 2017. Genetic diversity and screening of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for drought tolerance at reproductive phase. Bangladesh Rice Journal 21(1), 27-34.
Praba ML, Cairns JE, Babu RC, Lafitte HR. 2009. Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 195, 30-46.
Qayyum A, Razzaq A, Ahmad M, Jenks MA. 2013. Water stress causes differential effects on germination indices, total soluble sugar and proline content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. African Journal Biotechnology 10, 14038–14045. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2220
Qiang C, Yantai G, Cai Zhao, Hui-Lian Xu, Reagan M.W, Yining N. 2016. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development 36, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0338-6
Raja V, Majeed U, Kang H, Andrabi KI, John R. 2017. Abiotic stress: Interplay between ROS, hormones and MAPKs. Environmental Experimental Botany 137, 142–157.
Shah TM, Imran M, Atta BM. 2020.Selection and screening of drought tolerant high yielding chickpea genotypes based on physio-biochemical indices and multi-environmental yield trials. BMC Plant Biology 20, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02381-9
Upadhyaya H, Panda SK, Dutta BK. 2008. Variation of physiological and antioxidative responses in tea cultivars subjected to elevated water stress followed by rehydration recovery. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 30, 457–468.
Wu FB, Zhang GP, Dominy P. 2003. Four barley genotypes respond differently to cadmium lipid peroxidation and activities of antioxidant capacity. Environmental Experimental Botany 50, 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00113-2.
Zhang G, Tanakamaru KAJ, Morita S. 2007. Influence of waterlogging on some anti-oxidative enzymatic activities of two barley genotypes differing in anoxia tolerance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 29, 171–176.
Zhang J, Zhang S, Cheng M, Jiang H, Zhang X. 2018. Effect of drought on Agronomic traits of Rice and Wheat: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, 839.
Bulbul Ahmed, Atiya Sharmin Mitu, Mahbuba Khanum, Md. Harun, A.H.M. Motiur Rahman Talukder (2020), Contribution of drought on variability in crop yields and physiochemical responses of selected Rapeseed/mustard genotypes; IJB, V17, N6, December, P433-441
https://innspub.net/contribution-of-drought-on-variability-in-crop-yields-and-physiochemical-responses-of-selected-rapeseed-mustard-genotypes/
Copyright © 2020
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0