Development and quality evaluation of dahi (Traditional sweet curd) fortified with wood apple juice (Aegle marmelos)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2018
Views (194) Download (5)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development and quality evaluation of dahi (Traditional sweet curd) fortified with wood apple juice (Aegle marmelos)

Md. Tauhidul Islam, Md. Ahsanul Kabir, Md. Rezaul Hai Rakib, Morsheda Yesmin, Md. Yousuf Ali Khan, Md. Nurul Islam, Raihan Habib
Int. J. Biosci.12( 2), 156-161, February 2018.
Certificate: IJB 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Dahi has been consumed by people for its nutrient value and eating it regularly may boost several aspects of health like reduce the risk of heart disease, osteoporosis as well as aid in weight management. The research was conducted to prepare fruit flavored yogurt  with different levels of wood apple juice (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%) with whole milk in four different traits bearing samples identity A, B, C and D respectively. Samples were analyzed for composition, as well as organoleptic and microbial qualities. It was found that total score was significantly (p<0.001) increased by addition of 5% (w/w) juice, but decreased when the levels of juice were increased to 10% and 15% (w/w).  Dahi fortified with 5% wood apple juice was also the best in terms of smell and taste (p<0.01), body and consistency (p<0.05) and color and appearance (p<0.01). Addition of wood apple juice also significantly increased the total solids content (p<0.01), fat content (p<0.05) and pH (p<0.05), while no changes were observed for protein and ash contents. Total bacterial count in all the samples was found to be acceptable through there was no significant difference observed. The coliform count significantly (p<0.01) increased as the levels of fruit juice increased, though it was in acceptable range. Acceptability by consumer was also studied. Therefore, it can be recommended that the fortification of whole milk with 5% wood apple juice results in a fruit flavored dahi that is highly acceptable to the consumer.

VIEWS 7

AOAC. 2003. Official Methods of Analysis. I.17th ed. Association of Analytical Washington, DC, USA.

Aggarwala AC, Sharma A. 1961. Laboratory Manual of milk Inspection, Bombay, Calcutta, New Delhi, India.

Desai SR, Toro VA, Joshi SV. 1994. Utilization of different fruits in the manufacture of yogurt. Indian Journal of Dairy Science  47(10), 870-887.

Ghosh J, Rojorhia GS. 1987. Chemical Microbiological and sensory properties of with misti dahi in Calcutta. Asian Journal Dairy Research 6, 11-18.

Gopalan CB, Shastri balasubramain NR. 1971. Nutritive value of Indian food. National Institute of food, I.C.M.R. Huderabad, India.

Manus LJ. 1973. Factors influencing consistency and taste. Dairy and ice cream field 156, 52-58.

Mustafa MD. 1997. A study on the preparation of fruit dahi (yogurt). M.S, Thesis, Dept. of Dairy Science, BAU, Mymensingh, 22-25.

Rahman SM. 1998. A study on the manufacturing and shelf life of Jack fruit dahi (yogurt). M.S. Thesis, Department of dairy science, BAU, Mymensingh, Bangladesh 55, 60.

Sahadeva RP, Leong SF, Chua KH, Tan CH, Chan HY, Tong EV, Wong SYW, Chan HK. 2011. Survival of commercial probiotic strains to pH and bile, International Food Research Journal, 18(4), 1515-1522.

Sarkar S, Misra AK. 2002. Yogurt: nutritional and therapeutic significance, Indian Journal Microbial, 42, 275-287.

Sharma V, Purohit GR, Arya RS, Harsh M. 2006. Evaluation of some complete rations in sheep incorporating unconventional feed resources of arid zone in India. Animal Nutrition Feed Technology 6, 135-141.

Shukla FC, Jain SC, Sandhu KS. 1987. Technological and physiological aspects of yoghurt and fruit yoghurt. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 12-16.

White CH. 1991. Fruit flavored yogurt drinks: the dairy cola. Louisiana Agriculture 28(1), 20-21.