Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2019
Views (664)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Zia-Ul-Haq, Muhammad Rehan Jamil, Yasir Khalil, Muhammad Arslan Anwar, Yasir Mehmood, Muhammad Adnan Islam, Talha Mehmood, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam
Int. J. Biosci. 15(3), 528-532, September 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Off-season production of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) can achieve recommended consumption with high profit. The process of transfer of pollen grains from the male anther of a flower to the female stigma is known as pollination process. Usually it requires greenhouses construction. Many crops rely on insect pollination. However, insects are commonly not possible in greenhouses due to their control environment, which is a major pollination problem that can decrease fruit size and yield by directly reducing pollen deposition. To avoid this issue, a handy mechanical pollinator was developed with main components; DC motor, rod, battery (4 volts), cam on DC motor, oscillating device, switch, wires, battery connectors and rubber band at Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology. For testing of machine an experiment was conducted at Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi in cropping season of 2018-19. It was experimentally manipulated artificial/mechanical pollination and its performance was compared with self-pollination. Data were recorded on diameter of fruits (cm), fruit weight per plant (kg), yield (t/ha). For statistical analysis, Statistix. 8.1 software was used by selecting Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with five repeats. All the parameters measured differed significantly. Artificial pollination increased fruit size, suggesting hypothesis that sufficient pollination increases plant fitness.

Abrol DP. 2013. Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. New York.

Aliyu L. 2000. The effects of organic and mineral fertilizer on growth, yield and composition of pepper. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 18, 29-36

Benjamin FE, Winfree R. 2014. Lack of pollinators limits fruit production in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ. Entomol 43, 1574-1583.

Cuellar J, Cooman A, Arjona H. 2001. Increase of the productivity of a greenhouse tomato crop improving the pollination. Agronomia Colombiana 18(3), 39-45.

Eriksson O. 2013. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88, 494-502.

Hanna HY. 2004. Air blowers are less effective pollinators of greenhouse tomatoes than electric vibrators but cost less to operate. Hort. Technology 14(1), 104-7.

Kelley WT, Boyhan G. 2009. Commercial Pepper Production Handbook. The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension.

Klein AM. 2009. Nearly rainforest promotes coffee pollination by increasing spatio-temporal stability in bee species richness. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1838-1845.

Sabir N, Singh B. 2013. Protected cultivation of vegetables in global arena: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(2), 123-35.

Sinsinwar S, Teja K. 2012. Development of a cost effective, energy sustainable hydroponic fodder production device. Agri. Engineering Interns. III, Kharagpur p 335.

Sreedhara DS, Kerutagi MG, Basavaraja H, Kunnal LB, Dodamani MT. 2013. Economics of capsicum production under protected conditions in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26, 217-219.

Tesfaw A. 2013. Benefit-cost analysis of growing pepper: A trial at west Gojjam, near the source of blue Nile. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 6, 1203-1214.

Related Articles

Evaluation of the impact of floristic diversity on the productivity of cocoa-based agroforestry systems in the new cocoa production area: The case of the Biankouma department (Western Côte d’Ivoire)

N'gouran Kobenan Pierre, Zanh Golou Gizele*, Kouadio Kayeli Anaïs Laurence, Kouakou Akoua Tamia Madeleine, N'gou Kessi Abel, Barima Yao Sadaiou Sabas, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 44-55, January 2026.

Utilization of locally sourced feed ingredients and their influence on the growth performance of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): A study in support of the school’s chicken multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Maricel F. Campańano, Joe Hmer Kyle T. Acorda, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Jojo D. Cauilan, John Michael U. Tabil, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 35-43, January 2026.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding malaria prevention and the use of long lasting insecticidal nets after mass distribution campaigns in northern Côte d’Ivoire

Donatié Serge Touré, Konan Fabrice Assouho*, Konan Rodolphe Mardoché Azongnibo, Ibrahim Kounady Ouattara, Foungoye Allassane Ouattara, Mamadou Doumbia, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 28-34, January 2026.

Characterization of stands and evaluation of carbon sequestration capacity of shea parklands (Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Gaertn., Sapotaceae) in the departments of Dabakala and Kong, Ivory Coast

Konan Nicolas Kouamé*, Lacina Fanlégué Coulibaly, Mohamed Sahabane Traoré, Eric-Blanchard Zadjéhi Koffi, Nafan Diarrassouba, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 1-15, January 2026.

Muscle type and meat quality of local chickens according to preslaughter transport conditions and sex in Benin

Assouan Gabriel Bonou*, Finagnon Josée Bernice Houéssionon, Kocou Aimé Edenakpo, Serge Gbênagnon Ahounou, Chakirath Folakè Arikè Salifou, Issaka Abdou Karim Youssao, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 241-250, December 2025.

Effects of micronutrients and timing of application on the agronomic and yield characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Princess Anne C. Lagcao, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 214-240, December 2025.