Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2019
Views (685)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Zia-Ul-Haq, Muhammad Rehan Jamil, Yasir Khalil, Muhammad Arslan Anwar, Yasir Mehmood, Muhammad Adnan Islam, Talha Mehmood, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam
Int. J. Biosci. 15(3), 528-532, September 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Off-season production of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) can achieve recommended consumption with high profit. The process of transfer of pollen grains from the male anther of a flower to the female stigma is known as pollination process. Usually it requires greenhouses construction. Many crops rely on insect pollination. However, insects are commonly not possible in greenhouses due to their control environment, which is a major pollination problem that can decrease fruit size and yield by directly reducing pollen deposition. To avoid this issue, a handy mechanical pollinator was developed with main components; DC motor, rod, battery (4 volts), cam on DC motor, oscillating device, switch, wires, battery connectors and rubber band at Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology. For testing of machine an experiment was conducted at Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi in cropping season of 2018-19. It was experimentally manipulated artificial/mechanical pollination and its performance was compared with self-pollination. Data were recorded on diameter of fruits (cm), fruit weight per plant (kg), yield (t/ha). For statistical analysis, Statistix. 8.1 software was used by selecting Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with five repeats. All the parameters measured differed significantly. Artificial pollination increased fruit size, suggesting hypothesis that sufficient pollination increases plant fitness.

Abrol DP. 2013. Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. New York.

Aliyu L. 2000. The effects of organic and mineral fertilizer on growth, yield and composition of pepper. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 18, 29-36

Benjamin FE, Winfree R. 2014. Lack of pollinators limits fruit production in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ. Entomol 43, 1574-1583.

Cuellar J, Cooman A, Arjona H. 2001. Increase of the productivity of a greenhouse tomato crop improving the pollination. Agronomia Colombiana 18(3), 39-45.

Eriksson O. 2013. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88, 494-502.

Hanna HY. 2004. Air blowers are less effective pollinators of greenhouse tomatoes than electric vibrators but cost less to operate. Hort. Technology 14(1), 104-7.

Kelley WT, Boyhan G. 2009. Commercial Pepper Production Handbook. The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension.

Klein AM. 2009. Nearly rainforest promotes coffee pollination by increasing spatio-temporal stability in bee species richness. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1838-1845.

Sabir N, Singh B. 2013. Protected cultivation of vegetables in global arena: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(2), 123-35.

Sinsinwar S, Teja K. 2012. Development of a cost effective, energy sustainable hydroponic fodder production device. Agri. Engineering Interns. III, Kharagpur p 335.

Sreedhara DS, Kerutagi MG, Basavaraja H, Kunnal LB, Dodamani MT. 2013. Economics of capsicum production under protected conditions in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26, 217-219.

Tesfaw A. 2013. Benefit-cost analysis of growing pepper: A trial at west Gojjam, near the source of blue Nile. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 6, 1203-1214.

Related Articles

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.