Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (605)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Novia Novariani, Hamdani Fauzi, Basir
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 13(1), 93-101, July 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Social forestry is the answer to poverty alleviation and also to mitigate climate change. Through the HKm (community forest), Village Forest, HTR (community forest plantation) and Partnership schemes, so we will get the implication and the community will gain economic benefits by proposing surrounded forest area to become a Social Forestry area in Rantau Bujur Village and Pakutik Village. The purpose of this research is to describe the implementation of social forestry, identify the role of forest village community institutions in social forestry, and also formulate a strategy of social forestry development in the kayutangi forest management unit. The method that has been used in this study is likert scale, qualitative descriptive analysis and SWOT analysis. This study had an identification of village communities by using 28 respondents and 4 key informants. Implementation of LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Asuhan murni is 77.14% and LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Sinar baru is only 56.42% because of the lack of information on social forestry and the lack of counseling from the Office/KPH to the community, and also the lack of community experience in organization. .The strategy that was chosen in the Rantau Bujur Village is Strength-Opportunities/SO (Strength-opportunities), which the strengths that we have can be used optimally, while in the Pakutik Village used Weakness-Opportunities /WO (Strength-opportunities), to maximize the opportunity factors to reduce weakness. This study produced each of three social forestry development strategies.

Awang, S. 2010. Politik Kehutanan Masyarakat. Kreasi Wacana, Yogyakarta.

Bappeda Kalsel. 2006. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2005-2025. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin.

BPDAS Barito. 2009. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Gerakan Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan di Kalimantan Selatan. Balai Pengelolaan DAS Barito, Banjarbaru.

Fauzi H. 2010. Pembangunan Hutan Berbasis Kehutanan Sosial. Karya Putra Darwati, Bandung https://www.pengertianmenurutparaahli.net (Diakses 6 Juni 2017).

Fauzi, H. 2010. Kehutanan masyarakat (1st ed., p. 274). Pustaka Banua. Banjarmasin.

Mardikanto et al. 1996. Penyuluhan Pembangunan Kehutanan. Pusat Penyuluhan Kehutanan Departemen Kehutanan RI dan Fakultas Pertanian UNS. Jakarta.

Rangkuti F. 2005. Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis untuk Menghadapi Abad 21. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Saputra, Mulyana A. 2010. Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat Studi Modal Sosial dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Karang Tengah Kecamatan Madang Kabupaten Bogor.Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta  Sukardayati, (2006). Strategi Perhutanan Sosial.

Related Articles

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.