Diversification of Philippine silk products for greater marketability and profitability

Paper Details

Research Paper 10/11/2023
Views (1048)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Diversification of Philippine silk products for greater marketability and profitability

Jocelyn Q. Higoy, Pura S. Obille
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 23(5), 31-37, November 2023.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2023; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The production, saleability, profitability, and product preferences must be evaluated in order to serve as benchmark references in developing enhanced and diverse silk products that are tailored to their demands in order to increase profitability.  There was a significant volume of production and sales on silk items, notably silk fabric, which remained the top sales earner, followed by sablay rentals and novelty products, earning the highest net revenue of P 306,858.14, P 98,000.00, and P 52,514.00, respectively.  Sericulture product profitability demonstrated ROIs of 57.82%, 45.45%, and 30.52% for novelty goods, sablay rentals, and silk fabric, respectively. Silk fabric was loved and purchased by the majority of respondents (77.5%), followed by novelty products (18.33%).  These were purchased due to the design and craftsmanship (27.4 5), color (24.17%), and general attractiveness (21.67%) of the products.  These sericulture products have the potential to greatly contribute to the industry’s growth and development.  Factors affecting the customers’ product preference and saleability were age, educational attainment, gender and income which indicate that customers’ purchasing decisions are influenced by their age and educational level, with mature and educated individuals appreciating craftsmanship, color, and product acceptability.  Furthermore, gender significantly impacts the saleability of products hence, marketers should understand gender differences in decision-making styles, as females tend to buy more sericulture products, valuing silk as the “Queen of all Textiles”.  The respondents’ higher income indicates their ability to purchase high-quality silk products, particularly silk fabrics, which are often considered more expensive than other fabrics.  The study proposes that sericulture is a profitable and productive industry that can be further developed by SRDI and other small businesses through continuous improvement and product innovation

Chanotra S. 2019. Sericulture: An opportunity for the Upliftment of Rural Livelihood. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(6), 1100-1103.

Connor M. 2021.  Sustainable rice farming and its impact on rural women in Myanmar. Development in Practice 31(1), 49-58. DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2020.1787350

Doneys P.  2020. Seeing Empowerment as Relational: Lessons From Women Participating in Development Projects in Cambodia. Development in Practice 30(2), 268–280.

Gapuz CF, Gapuz Jr. FV. 2012. Sericulture for Sustainable Environment and Income Generation: The Case of the CHED-DMMMSU Sericulture Project. IAMURE International Journal of Business and Management 3(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ijbm.v3i1.269.

Geetha GS, Indira R. 2017.  Women, Income Generation and Political Capital in the Silk Industry in Karnataka. Gender, Technology and Development Journal 14(3), 423-440.  https://doi.org./10.1177/097185241001400307

Kasi E. 2013.   Role of Women in Sericulture and Community Development: A Study from a South Indian Village. SAGE Open 13, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2861012

Lungelo C.  2021. Empowerment and agricultural mechanization: perceptions and experiences of women tractor operators in Ghana. Development in Practice 31(8), 988-1001, DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2021.1937551

Othman M,  Oughthon E, Garrud G. 2020.  Significance of farming groups for resource access and livelihood improvement of rural smallholder women farmers. Development in Practice 30(4), 1-13  DOI:10.1080/09614524.2020.1764502

Pathare P. 2017. Participation of women in Sericulture Activities of Ahmednagar District (M. S) India. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS)  22(8), 90-93.

Philippine Commission on Women. 2009. Republic Act 7192 Women in Development and Nation Building Act. www.pcw.gov.ph

Rani UJ. 2017. Employment Generation to Women in Drought-Prone Areas: A Study with Reference to the Development of Sericulture in Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Social Sciences 14(3), 249-255. DOI:10.1080/09718923.2007.11978356

Roy C. 2015. Inclusive Development in Sericulture through Female Empowerment. A Case Study in Malda District, West Bengal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275911128

Sarkar S. 2017.  Critical Analysis on Role of Women in Sericulture Industry, Department of Sericulture, Krishnath College, Berhampore, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Social Science Citation 6(3), 211-222.

Sevilla C. 1992.  Research Methods. Revised Edition. Manila: Rex Printing Co. Inc.

Sharma  K,  Kapoor B. 2020. Sericulture as a Profit-Based Industry-A Review. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences 8(4), 550-562.

Sengupta M,  Soma B, Pijush M, Soumen S. 2020. Women Participation In Sericulture Activities Of South 2,  Parganas  District, West  Bengal: An Interim Report Of An Ongoing Study. J. Environ. & Sociobiol.  17(2),  53-56.

Soriano I. 2016. The Modern Filipino. https://primer.com.ph/tips-guides/2016/02/06/get-to-know-the-modern-filipino-woman/

UN WOMEN. 2014. Human Rights of Women. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/end-violence-against-women/2014/rights

Related Articles

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.

Extraction and characterization of distilled water from by-product of salt refinery processing

Analyn I. Diola*, Eric A. Cunanan, Irene A. De Vera, Christian Garret F. Aquino, Julie M. Agpaoa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 151-156, January 2026.

Vulnerability to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: The case of the Talusan, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines

Angelica M. Darunday*, Judy Ann H. Fernandez, Shekinah L. Ogoc, Norlika D. Moti, Larry C. Herbito, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 138-150, January 2026.

Socio-ecological dimensions of intertidal gleaning: The use of local ecological knowledge to identify commercially important gastropods in Iligan Bay, Philippines

Katrina Flores, Armi G. Torres, Wella T. Tatil, Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 126-137, January 2026.

Conservation assessment of the marine ornamental fish species Pomacanthus imperator (Emperor angelfish) in the Philippines

Timothy Jan L. Adel*, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 114-125, January 2026.

Land use conflicts: An impediment to improved agrifood value chain management as perceived by crop farmers in southeast Nigeria

J. U. Chikaire, C. C. Ejiogu, H. I. Duruanyim, T. O. Ogbuji, S. I. Ogbaa, A. O. Kalu, J. I. Ukpabi, A. Rufai, L. C. Izunobi, J. U. Okwudili, C. I. Anah, E. U. Omeire, I. O. Okeoma, J. Nnametu, U. G. Chris-Ejiogu, I. E. Edom, C. N. Atoma, U. S. Awhareno, E. C. Mube-Williams, S. O. Adejoh, A. D. Ude, J. O. Oparaojiaku, C. O. Osuagwu, E. E. Ihem, B. N. Aririguzo, E. C. C. Amaechi, M. N. Osuji, C. A. Acholonu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 102-113, January 2026.