Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 13/05/2026
Views (102)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*
Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study evaluated the agronomic and economic performance of selected cropping systems involving sweet corn (Zea mays L.) and finger pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under La Union conditions, Philippines. The experiment was conducted from November 2025 to January 2026 using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Three cropping systems were compared: monocrop sweet corn, monocrop finger pepper, and sweet corn + finger pepper intercrop. Agronomic, yield, and economic parameters were assessed. Results showed that cropping system had no significant effect on days to tasseling, cob length, cob diameter, chlorophyll content, sweet corn yield, finger pepper flowering, fruit length, and plant height. Monocrop sweet corn produced significantly taller plants (232.87 cm) than intercropped sweet corn (222.55 cm), while intercropped sweet corn produced significantly heavier ears (237.71 g) than monocrop sweet corn (230.85 g). Sweet corn yield was statistically comparable between monocrop (2,328.18 kg ha⁻¹) and intercrop (2,152.19 kg ha⁻¹) systems. Monocrop finger pepper produced significantly higher marketable yield (20,954.30 g) than intercropped finger pepper (8,318.38 g). Economic analysis revealed that monocrop sweet corn had the lowest production cost (₱32,560.00 ha⁻¹), highest net income (₱1,563,606.00 ha⁻¹), highest return on investment (4,769.22%), and highest benefit-cost ratio (48.69). The intercrop system incurred the highest production cost (₱36,640.00 ha⁻¹) but remained profitable, generating a net income of ₱1,263,885.80 ha⁻¹, ROI of 3,416.43%, and BCR of 35.16. The findings indicate that monocrop sweet corn is the most economically efficient cropping system under La Union conditions. However, sweet corn–finger pepper intercropping remains a profitable alternative that offers production diversification and potential risk reduction for smallholder farmers.

Belay D, Melka Y. 2024. Comparative profitability analysis of monoculture and intercropping land-use systems: The case of smallholder farmers in north-western Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research 2024, 6322124.

Celerinos IC, Manigo AE. 2025. Sweetcorn production guide for smallholder farmers in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Department of Agriculture–Bureau of Agricultural Research.

Choi H, Jo Y, Lee JH, Moh SH, Cho WK. 2023. Development of a speed breeding protocol with flowering gene investigation in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1151765.

Department of Agriculture (DA). 2022. Intercropping as a sustainable farming practice for smallholder vegetable farmers. Quezon City, Philippines: Bureau of Agricultural Research.

Emran SA, Krupnik TJ, Aravindakshan S, Kumar V. 2022. Impact of cropping system diversification on productivity and resource use efficiencies of smallholder farmers in south-central Bangladesh. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42(4), 78. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-022-00795-3.

Hu J, Lin X, Wang J, Chi F, Chu H, Zhang J, Cai Z. 2023. Intercropping with maize suppresses Phytophthora blight of pepper by promoting beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 356, 108117.

Legba K, Sossou R, Natta AK, Vodouhe SD. 2023. Assessing the economic performance of maize-pepper intercropping configurations in Benin. Agronomy 13(4), 981. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13040981.

Li C, Stomph T, Makowski D, Li H, Zhang C, Zhang F, van der Werf W. 2023. The productive performance of intercropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(2), e2201886120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201886120.

Liu X, Ren L, Chen L, Wang Q, Guo Z, Dai F. 2021. Pepper-maize intercropping affects the occurrence of anthracnose in hot pepper. Crop Protection 148, 105757. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105757.

Maitra S, Hossain A, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Ondrisik P, Gitari H, Brahmachari K, Sankar T, Bhadra P, Palai JB, Jena J, Bhattacharya U, Duvvada SK, Lalichetti S, Sairam M. 2021. Intercropping: A low-input agricultural strategy for food and environment security. Agronomy 11(3), 343. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11030343.

Paut R, Sabatier R, Tchamitchian M. 2023. Reducing crop vulnerability through plant diversification in intercropping systems. PLOS ONE 18(3), e0282297. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282297.

Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). 2023. Crops Statistics of the Philippines. Philippine Statistics Authority.

Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). 2024. Performance of Philippine Agriculture: January to December 2023. Philippine Statistics Authority.

Republic Act 10068. 2010. An Act providing for the development and promotion of organic agriculture in the Philippines.

Villanueva MRC, Balderama Saguibo LD. 2021. Growth and yield performance of chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) as influenced by different intercropping systems and fertilizer application in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 46(2), 38–47.

Related Articles

Evaluation of the effectiveness of some plant extracts against cowpea charcoal rot

Manan Djamila Baikoro*, Dianyagou Paul Ouali, Wendoléan Romain Soalla, Pawindé Elisabeth Zida, Bouma James Neya, Marie Laure Guissou, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 118-127, June 2026.

Physicochemical profiling and quality evaluation of commercial mustard oils brands in Bangladesh: Indicators of stability and consumer safety

Umme Salma Nahida, Md. Al-Amin Mia, Afroza Bashar*, Tauhida Tasnim, Marjina Akter, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 108-117, June 2026.

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.