Effect of soil acidity on some soybean varieties

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2015
Views (845)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of soil acidity on some soybean varieties

Diana Sofia Hanafiah, Alida Lubis, Asmarlaili
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(4), 43-48, April 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the mechanism of adaptation and morphophysiology character of soybean genotypes to soil acidity levels. Research using randomized block design with four replications, the first factor consists of soybean varieties: Tanggamus varieties, Detam 2, Anjasmoro and Detam 1, while the second factor is the media’s treatment consisted of medium acid soils and limed soil. The results showed that the low level acidity of planting medium will affect the growth and development of plants. There are different mechanisms of adaptation to acidity on soybean varieties. Avoidance mechanism is indicated by an increase in pH around the roots on Tanggamus varieties, Detam2, Anjasmoro and Detam1. Tolerant mechanism is indicated by the maturation age and high production on Tanggamus varieties

Arsyad MD, Adie MM, Kuswantoro H. 2007. The Assembly of Specific Agroecology Soybean Varieties. In: Sumarno, Suyamto, A Widjono, Herman, H Kasim (eds). Soybeans: Production Engineering and Development. Bogor: Center for Food Crops Research and Development.

Bertham RYH, Nusantara AD. 2011. Mechanism of adaptation new soybean genotypes in getting nutrient phosphorus of soil mineral acid. Agronomy Journal of Indonesia 39 (1), 24-30

Bolan NS, Naidu R, Mahimairaja S, Baskaran S. 1994. Influence of low molecular-weight organic acids on the solubilization of phosphates. Biology and Fertiity of Soils. 18, 311- 319.

Ekawaty D. 2007. Tolerant Studies of Soybean Varieties [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] on the content of AlCl 3 through in Vitro Tecnique. Faculty of Agriculture, North Sumatra.

Fitter AH, Hay RKM. 1981. Environmental Physiology of Plants. Academic Press, Inc.

Gandanegara S, Hendratno, Yuliasti, Sumarna N. 2007. Effect of lime and rhizobium isolates to performance soybean mutant line on acid soil. National Atomic Energy Agency.

Hakim N, Nyakpa M, Lubis AM, Nugroho SG, Diha A, Fong GB, Bailey HH. 1986. Fundamentals of Soil Science. IPB-Press, Bogor.

Hanafiah DS, Trikoesoemaningtyas, Yahya S, Wirnas D. 2012. Differential mechanism of adaptation to drought in soybean varieties (Glycine max. L. Merr.). Prosiding of International Seminar and Launching Varieties “Agriculture Adaptation in the Tropics”, Bogor Agricultural University and SEAMEO-BIOTROP.

Hanum C, Mugnisjah WQ, Yahya S, Sopandie D, Idris K, Sahar A. 2007. The Growth of soybean root at aluminium toxicity, drought stress, and double stress aluminium toxicity and drought stress. Agritrop, 26 (1), 13 – 18.

Hocking PJ. 2001. Organic acids exuded from roots in phosphorus uptake and aluminium tolerance of plants in acid soils. Advances in Agronomy Journal. 74,63-97.

Mulyani A. 2006. Potential acid dry land for agricultural development. News of Agricultural Research and Development 28 (2), 1- 5.

Prasetiyono J and Tasliah, 2003. Approach strategy for plant breeding biotechnology tolerant aluminum toxicity. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol.10 (1), 64-67

Rachman A, Subiksa MGI, Wahyunto. 2007. Expanding the Area of Soybean Plants to Sub Optimal Land. Center for Food Crops Research and Development. Bogor

Sopandie D. 2006. Perspectives physiology in the development of food crops in marginal lands. Scientific Oration Professor of Plant Physiology, IPB, Bogor.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.