Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | September 1, 2016

VIEWS 1
| Download 1

Effect of soil mineralogical composition on fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars

Azizi Gannouni Thouraya, Albouchi Ali, José Antonio Campoy, Magid Mezni, Ben Ahmed Hela, Ammari Youssef

Key Words:


Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.9(3), 45-56, September 2016

Certification:

IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Leaf nutrient concentration of sweet cherry (Prunu savium. L) cultivars was affected by mineralogical composition of soil and tree requirements. Thus, the main objective of this study was to evaluate and choose the performance of the most sweet cherries cultivars in two different pedoclimatic orchards through weight, acidity, firmness, soluble solids content, ripening index and mineral analysis of leaves at 60 days after full bloom (DAFB). This study was carried out in two experimental sites in the North-West of Tunisia (Tibar and Ain-Drahem), with the main purpose of investigating the foliar macronutrient content of four cultivars which are Napoleon, Van, Moreau and Sunburst. The physic-chemical analysis of the soil shows that Tibar’s soil was heavy, while Ain Drahem’s was light. The mineral leaf analysis shows that the four cultivars presented deficiency on leaf P, K, Ca and Mg concentration but nutrional balance on N concentration. The best fruit weight was found in Sunburst in Ain-Drahim (4,81g) and Van (6,49g) in Tibar. Titratable acidity of Tibar’s cultivars was more important than those of Ain Drahem. At both orchards, Moreau showed the balanced nutritional values (∑DOP index), whereas the poorest were found in Napoleon, Van and Sunburst.

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of soil mineralogical composition on fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars

Andziak J, Tomala K, Sadowski A, Dziuban R. 2004. Stan odżywienias kładni kamim ineralny minazdol nośćprzec howalnicza jabłek ‘Šampion’ w zależnoś ciodpodkładki. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortum Cultus 3(2), 179–187.

Ballistreri G, Continella A, Gentile A, Amenta M, Fabroni S, Rapisarda P. 2013. Fruit quality and bioactive compounds relevant to human health of sweet cherry (Prunu savium L.) cultivars grown in Italy. Food Chem 140, 630–638.

Bergmann W. 1992. Colour Atlas. Nutritional Disorders of Plants. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena.

Betran JA, Val J, Milla´n LM, Monge E, Montan˜e´s L, Moreno MA. 1997. Influence of rootstock on the mineral concentrations of flowers and leaves from sweet cherry. Acta Horticulturae 448, 163-167

Bretaudeau J, Fauré Y. 1992. Atlas d’arboriculture fruitière, Vol.1, 3 Edit. Lavoisier, Paris 289 p.

Caliskan O, Polat A. 2008. Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and clones grown in Turkey, Sci. Hort 115, 360-367.

Calvet G, Villemin P. 1986. Interpretation of soil analysis. Ed, SCPA, 24p.

Cantin CM, Pinochet J, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA. 2010. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’ and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’ sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Sci. Hortic 123, 329–335.

Christensen JV. 1995. Evaluation of fruit characteristics of 20 sweet cherry cultivars. Fruit Var. J 49, 113-117.

Coutanceau M. 1962. Fruit arboriculture, technical and economic woody rosaceae fruit crops, 2èm Edition, Editions JB Baillièreand sons, Paris 575 P.

Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P. 2003. Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Post-harvest Biol. Techn 28, 159-167.

Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L. 2004. A study on the relationships between some fruit characteristics in cherries. Fruits 59, 219–223.

Folge HW. 1975. Cherries. In: Janick J., Moore J.M. Advances in Fruit Breeding. West Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue University Press pp. 348–366.

Gautier M. 1987. Fruit farming (Vol. 2). Agriculture today’s fruit productions. Ed, J.B. Baillière, 481 p.

Gerardi C, Blando F, Santino A, Zacheo G. 2001. Purification and characterisation of a ß-glucosidase abundantly expressed in ripe sweet cherry (Prunu savium L.) fruit. Plant Sci 16, 795–805.

German E, Prunet JP, Alin G. 1999. Le noyer. Edition Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Fruits et des Légumes CTIFL. 279 P.

Hegedus A, Taller D, Papp N, Szikriszt B, Ercisli S, Halasz J, Stefanovits-Banyai E. 2013. Fruit antioxidant capacity and self-incompatibility genotype of Ukrainian sweet cherry (Prunu savium L.) cultivars highlight their breeding prospects. Euphytica 191, 153–164.

Heller R, Esnault Rand Lance C. 1998. Plant physiology, T.I, « Nutrition ». 6e Edit Dunod, 323 p. (In Paris)

Huguetj G. 1978. Practice mineral fertilization of fruit trees. Editions Invuflec Paris 38p.

Johnson RS, Uriu K. 1989. Peach, Plum and Nectarine: Growing and Handling for Fresh Market. University of California, Division of Agriculture Resource, Oakland, CA pp. 68–81.

Kacar B. 1995. Soil Analysis. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture. Ankara, Turkey.

Kappel F, Fischer FB, Hogue E. 1996. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. Hort. Sci 31, 443–446.

Khelil A. 1989. Nutrition and the Fertilizing fruit trees and the vine, Office of university Publications, Ben Aknoun 67 P. (In Algeria)

Kuden A, Kaska N. 1995. Variety testing and selection in sweet cherries. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Horticulture Congress. Adana, Turkey pp. 233-237.

Leece DR 1975. Diagnostic leaf analysis for stone fruit, Sweet cherry. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb 15, 118–122.

Lichou J, Audubert A. 1989. The apricot, Bayeusaine Editions. Bayeux, 386 p.

Marschner H, Romheld V, Horst WJ, Martin P. 1986b. Root-induced changes in rhizosphere: Importance for the mineral nutrition of plants. Zeitschriftfür Pflanzenernährung Bodenkunde 149, 441-456.

Milošević T, Milošević N, Glišić I, Nikolić R, Milivojević J. 2014. Early tree growth, productivity, fruit quality and leaf nutrients content of sweet cherry grown in a high density planting system. Hort. Sci 42, 1–12.

Milošević T, Milošević N, Glišić I. 2013. Tree growth, yield, fruit quality attributes and leaf nutrient content of ‘Roxana’ apricot as influenced by natural zeolite, organic and inorganic fertilisers. Scientia Horticulturae 156, 131–139.

Montañés L, Sanz M. 1994. Prediction of reference values for early leaf analysis for peach trees. J. Plant Nutr. 17, 1647-1657.

Moreno MA, Monta˜nes LL, Tabuenca MC, Cambra R. 1996. The performance of Adara as a cherry rootstock. Sci. Hortic 65, 58–91.

Neilsen G, Kappel F. 1996. Bing sweet cherry leaf nutrition is affected by rootstock. Hort Science 31, 1169–1172.

Pérez SR, Gómez SMA, Morales CMR. 2010. Description and quality evaluation of sweet cherries cultured in Spain. J. Food Quality 33, 490–506.

Roversi A, Malvicini GL, Porro D, Plessi C. 2010. Sweet cherry leaf composition as influenced by genotype, rootstock and orchard management. Acta Horticulturae. 868, 243-246.

Russel K. 2003. EuForgen Technical guidelines for genetic concervation and use for wild cherry (Prunu savium). International plant genetic resources, Rome, Italy, 6p.

Serrano M, Guillen F, Martinez RD, Castillo S, Valero D. 2005. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. J. Agric. Food Chem 53, 2741–2745.

Sitarek M, Grzyb ZS, Olszewski T. 1998. The mineral elements concentration in leaves of two sweet cherry cultivars grafted on different rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae 468, 373-376.

Soltner D. 2000. Bases of crop production, the soil and its improvement. 22nd Edition, Science Publishing and farming techniques 472 p.

Sotirov D. 2011. Macro-elements content of the leaves of Van sweet cherry cultivar on different rootstocks. Rastenievudni Nauki 48, 43-46.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background