Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2015
Views (672)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Neha Shreya, Biswajit Paul
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(1), 513-521, January 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Fly ash is a coal combustion byproduct. It is generally light grey in color and consists mostly of silt- and clay-sized glassy spheres. It is regarded as a solid waste material and hazardous to health as it causes many occupational diseases. One of the best methods to minimize the fly ash landfills impact is to utilize it in social and economical manner like in concrete production, due to its pozzolanic and cementitious properties, or by using it in other applications such as a geoliner construction material. The concept of utilizing fly ash as a geoliner firstly needs to optimize and analyze the characteristics of fly ash to be used as a worthy liner material. One of the factors, which need to be study for the formation of geoliner, is the geoliner contamination potential. Since material with potential contaminants cannot be used as liner material. The leaching water through ICP-MS analysis revealed that all the elements detected are below Indian standard of drinking water. Hence Fly ash can be used as a geoliner construction material and an alternative for waste management in India.

Analysis of Coal Fly Ash Thermo Scientific ARL PERFORM’X Series Advanced X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers. 2012, Application note: 41661, www.thermoscientific.com.

Chand P, Kumar AVA, Gaur A, Mahna SK. 2009. Elemental Analysis of Ash using X-Ray Fluorescence Technique. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 21(10), 220-222.

Daniel DE. 1993. Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal. Chapman&Hall, London, UK, 683.

Das BM. 2005. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd edition, Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited, U.S.A.

Dixon DA, Gray MN, Thomas AW. 1985. A study of the compaction properties of potential clay–sand buffer mixtures for use in nuclear fuel waste disposal, Engineering Geology. 21, 247–255.

Hua-lin X, You-gen T, Yu-jie LI, Li-bo LI. 2007. Determination of trace multi-elements in coal fly ash by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Central South University of Technology. 1, 0068−05.

Komine H. 2004. Simplified evaluation for swelling characteristics of bentonite, Engineering Geology. 71, 265-279.

Maiti SK. 2003. Handbook of methods in Environmental studies, Vol. 2 , Air, Noise, Soil and Overburden analysis, ABD Publishers , Jaipur (India).

MOEF. 2007. Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) Notification, Fly Ash Notification , Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

Pandian NS. 2004. Fly ash characterization with reference to geotechnical Applications, Journal of Indian Institute of Science. 84, 189–216.

Rao SM, Kachroo TA, Allam MM, Joshi MR, Acharya A. 2008. Geotechnical Characterization of Some Indian Bentonite for their Use as Buffer Material in Geological Repository, 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), 1-6 October, Goa, India.

Sivakugan N. 2000. Soil classification. 1-11.

Sikka and Kansal. Sikka R, Kansal BD. 1995. Effect of fly-ash application on yield and nutrient composition of rice, wheat and on pH and available nutrient status of soil, Bioresource Technology. 51, 199–203.

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2000. Current drinking water standards, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Washington.

Related Articles

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.

Extraction and characterization of distilled water from by-product of salt refinery processing

Analyn I. Diola*, Eric A. Cunanan, Irene A. De Vera, Christian Garret F. Aquino, Julie M. Agpaoa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 151-156, January 2026.

Vulnerability to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: The case of the Talusan, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines

Angelica M. Darunday*, Judy Ann H. Fernandez, Shekinah L. Ogoc, Norlika D. Moti, Larry C. Herbito, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 138-150, January 2026.

Socio-ecological dimensions of intertidal gleaning: The use of local ecological knowledge to identify commercially important gastropods in Iligan Bay, Philippines

Katrina Flores, Armi G. Torres, Wella T. Tatil, Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 126-137, January 2026.

Conservation assessment of the marine ornamental fish species Pomacanthus imperator (Emperor angelfish) in the Philippines

Timothy Jan L. Adel*, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 114-125, January 2026.

Land use conflicts: An impediment to improved agrifood value chain management as perceived by crop farmers in southeast Nigeria

J. U. Chikaire, C. C. Ejiogu, H. I. Duruanyim, T. O. Ogbuji, S. I. Ogbaa, A. O. Kalu, J. I. Ukpabi, A. Rufai, L. C. Izunobi, J. U. Okwudili, C. I. Anah, E. U. Omeire, I. O. Okeoma, J. Nnametu, U. G. Chris-Ejiogu, I. E. Edom, C. N. Atoma, U. S. Awhareno, E. C. Mube-Williams, S. O. Adejoh, A. D. Ude, J. O. Oparaojiaku, C. O. Osuagwu, E. E. Ihem, B. N. Aririguzo, E. C. C. Amaechi, M. N. Osuji, C. A. Acholonu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 102-113, January 2026.