Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2015
Views (599)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Neha Shreya, Biswajit Paul
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(1), 513-521, January 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Fly ash is a coal combustion byproduct. It is generally light grey in color and consists mostly of silt- and clay-sized glassy spheres. It is regarded as a solid waste material and hazardous to health as it causes many occupational diseases. One of the best methods to minimize the fly ash landfills impact is to utilize it in social and economical manner like in concrete production, due to its pozzolanic and cementitious properties, or by using it in other applications such as a geoliner construction material. The concept of utilizing fly ash as a geoliner firstly needs to optimize and analyze the characteristics of fly ash to be used as a worthy liner material. One of the factors, which need to be study for the formation of geoliner, is the geoliner contamination potential. Since material with potential contaminants cannot be used as liner material. The leaching water through ICP-MS analysis revealed that all the elements detected are below Indian standard of drinking water. Hence Fly ash can be used as a geoliner construction material and an alternative for waste management in India.

Analysis of Coal Fly Ash Thermo Scientific ARL PERFORM’X Series Advanced X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers. 2012, Application note: 41661, www.thermoscientific.com.

Chand P, Kumar AVA, Gaur A, Mahna SK. 2009. Elemental Analysis of Ash using X-Ray Fluorescence Technique. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 21(10), 220-222.

Daniel DE. 1993. Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal. Chapman&Hall, London, UK, 683.

Das BM. 2005. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd edition, Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited, U.S.A.

Dixon DA, Gray MN, Thomas AW. 1985. A study of the compaction properties of potential clay–sand buffer mixtures for use in nuclear fuel waste disposal, Engineering Geology. 21, 247–255.

Hua-lin X, You-gen T, Yu-jie LI, Li-bo LI. 2007. Determination of trace multi-elements in coal fly ash by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Central South University of Technology. 1, 0068−05.

Komine H. 2004. Simplified evaluation for swelling characteristics of bentonite, Engineering Geology. 71, 265-279.

Maiti SK. 2003. Handbook of methods in Environmental studies, Vol. 2 , Air, Noise, Soil and Overburden analysis, ABD Publishers , Jaipur (India).

MOEF. 2007. Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) Notification, Fly Ash Notification , Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

Pandian NS. 2004. Fly ash characterization with reference to geotechnical Applications, Journal of Indian Institute of Science. 84, 189–216.

Rao SM, Kachroo TA, Allam MM, Joshi MR, Acharya A. 2008. Geotechnical Characterization of Some Indian Bentonite for their Use as Buffer Material in Geological Repository, 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), 1-6 October, Goa, India.

Sivakugan N. 2000. Soil classification. 1-11.

Sikka and Kansal. Sikka R, Kansal BD. 1995. Effect of fly-ash application on yield and nutrient composition of rice, wheat and on pH and available nutrient status of soil, Bioresource Technology. 51, 199–203.

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2000. Current drinking water standards, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Washington.

Related Articles

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.

Conservation and trade dynamics of non-timber forest products in local markets in south western Cameroon

Kato Samuel Namuene, Mojoko Fiona Mbella, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Eunice Waki, Hudjicarel Kiekeh, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 58-69, August 2025.

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.