Effects of sequential pretreatments on selected agricultural biomass feedstock for bio methane production

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2021
Views (255) Download (26)

Effects of sequential pretreatments on selected agricultural biomass feedstock for bio methane production

Antonio-Abdu Sami M. Magomnang, Dianne Mae M. Asiñero
Int. J. Biosci.18( 4), 101-110, April 2021.
Certificate: IJB 2021 [Generate Certificate]


Agricultural Biomass are abundant and potential alternative for fossil fuels in Mindanao, Philippines. However, biomass contains lignocellulose that is recalcitrant to enzymatic hydrolysis because of its structural complexity. As a solution, pH controlled liquid hot water (LHW) and Ultrasonic pretreatment of cellulosic feedstock is employed in order to improve its enzymatic digestibility and making the cellulose more accessible to cellulase enzymes. The LHW pretreatment is carried out by cooking the feedstock using autoclave at temperatures between 160 and 190 degrees C and at a pH of 4-7. An additional 3-4% w/v Sodium Hydroxide solution is deployed to further improve its enzymatic digestibility. This resulted in an increase of methane production up to 300% more due to the pretreatment of rice straw and coconut shells. Further, the pretreated coconut shell subjected to Ultrasonication with 3% NaOH and Liquid Hot water has the best effect among the pretreatment of biomass feedstocks of rice straw and coconut shell at certain NaOH concentrations. This would give a viable estimate on the possible methane production from the co-digestion of these resources. Also, the enhancement of the biogas yield was mainly attributed to the improvement of biodegradability of rice straw and coconut shells through these pretreatments. The changes in chemical compositions, chemical structures, and physical characteristics made rice straw and coconut shell feedstocks become more available and biodegradable and thus were responsible for the enhancement of the biogas yield. These results are contributing to develop a feasible biogas production from rice straw and coconut shell.


Bagher AM, Fatemeh G, Saman M, Leili MM. 2015. Advantages and Disadvantages of Biogas Energy. Bulletin of Advanced Scientific Research, 1(5), p 132-135.

He Y, Pang Y, Liu Y, Li X, Wang K. 2008. Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production. Energy & Fuels, 22(4), p 2775-2781. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8000967

Jiang D, Ge X, Zhang Q, Li Y. 2016. Comparison of liquid hot water and alkaline pretreatments of giant reed for improved enzymatic digestibility and biogas energy production. Bioresource technology 216, p 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.052

Kaur K, Phutela UG. 2016. Enhancement of paddy straw digestibility and biogas production by sodium hydroxide-microwave pretreatment. Renewable Energy 92, p 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.083

Karray R, Hamza M, Sayadi S. 2015. Evaluation of ultrasonic, acid, thermo-alkaline and enzymatic pre-treatments on anaerobic digestion of Ulva rigida for biogas production. Bioresource technology 187, p 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.108

Lianhua L, Dong L, Yongming S, Longlong M, Zhenhong Y, Xiaoying K. 2010. Effect of temperature and solid concentration on anaerobic digestion of rice straw in South China. International journal of hydrogen energy 35(13), p 7261-7266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.074

Plácido J, Imam T, Capareda S. 2013. Evaluation of ligninolytic enzymes, ultrasonication and liquid hot water as pretreatments for bioethanol production from cotton gin trash. Bioresource technology 139, p 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.012

Philippoussis A, Zervakis G, Diamantopoulou P. 2001. Bioconversion of agricultural lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17(2), p 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016685530312

Quiroga G, Castrillón L, Fernández-Nava Y, Marañón E, Negral L, Rodríguez-Iglesias J, Ormaechea P. 2014. Effect of ultrasound pre-treatment in the anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge. Bioresource technology 154, p 74-79.

Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker DLAP. 2010. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory analytical procedure, (TP-510-42618). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.096

Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J. 2007. A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresource technology 98(16), p 3000-3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.022

Teghammar A, Chandra R, Saddler JN, Taherzadeh MJ, Horváth IS. 2012. Substrate characteristic analysis for anaerobic digestion: A study on rice and triticale straw. BioResources 7(3), p 3921-3934.

Zhang Y, Chen X, Gu Y, Zhou X. 2015. A physicochemical method for increasing methane production from rice straw: extrusion combined with alkali pretreatment. Applied energy 160, p 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.011