Energy, economic and GHG emissions analysis of potato production

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2015
Views (904)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Energy, economic and GHG emissions analysis of potato production

Amir Abbas Bakhtiari, Amir Hematian, Mohsen Moradipour
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(2), 398-406, February 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) are among the foremost vital international food crops. In this study cross-sectional data were collected from potato growers by employing a face to face survey in East-Azerbaijan Province of Iran. The data collected was analyzed for the energy, GHG emissions and economics of potato production. According to the results, total average energy inputs consumption and GHG emissions were 131608.14 MJ ha-1 and 4542 kg CO2eq.ha-1, respectively. Electricity, chemical fertilizers and diesel fuel were the most influential factors in energy consumption with quantity of 46.3, 34.7 and 24.6 GJ ha-1. Energy use efficiency, net energy and energy intensiveness were 0.97, -4292 MJ ha-1 and 21.73 MJ $-1, respectively. Among the energy inputs, the contribution of DE was more than that of IDE energy and also the proportion of NRE was more than RE resources. Electricity with a share of 52% played the most important role on GHG emissions, followed by diesel fuel (31%) and chemical fertilizer (12%). The results of economic analysis showed that the benefit to cost ratio was 1.1 and the economic productivity was 5.84 kg $-1. Economic analysis showed that the potato production could be a profitable business in East-Azerbaijan Province. Encouraging farm energy consumers to use less electricity is indispensable for sustainable use of energy and a key element of GHGs emission reduction.

Anonymous. 2012.  Annual  agricultural  statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran, Available at: URL: <www.maj.ir>.

Brown LR, Flavin, CF, French H. 1998. State of the World. WW. Norton, New York, p. 251.

Chetty VJ, Narváez-Vásquez J, Orozco-Cárdenas ML. 2015. Agrobacterium Protocols. Vol. 2, Part 2, Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) pp. 85-96. Springer New York. Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1658-0.

Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener HM, Akbolat D, Ekinci C. 2006. Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: a case study from Isparta province. Energy Conversation and Management 47, 1761-1769. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003

Dyer JA, Desjardins RL. 2006. Carbon dioxide emissions associated with the manufacturing of tractors and farm machinery in Canada. Biosystems Engineering 93(1), 107–118. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.09.011

Dyer JA, Desjardins RL. 2003. Simulated farm fieldwork, energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. Biosystems Engineering 85(4), 503-513. http://dx.doi:10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00072-2

Erdal G, Esengun K, Erdal H, Gunduz O. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32, 35-41. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2013. Available at: URL: <http://www.fao.org>.

Islam SMF, Papadopoulou H, Manos B. 2003. Ecological  Sustainability  in  Greek  Agriculture:  An Application  of  Energy  Flow  Approach.  Journal  of Environmental  Planning  and  Management  46(6), 875-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0964056032000157642

Khodi M, Mousavi S. 2009. Life cycle assessment of power generation technology using GHG emissions reduction approach. 7th National Energy Congress 2009; 22–23. Desember, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).

Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Yousefi M, Mousazadeh H, Rajaeifar MA. 2014. Application of artificial neural networks for prediction of output energy and GHG emissions in potato production in Iran. Agricultural Systems 123, 120–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.003

Kitani O. 1999. Energy and Biomass Engineering. CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering, St. Joseph, MI: ASAE, p. 330.

Lal R. 2004. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International 30, 981–990. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005

Mandal KG, Saha KP, Ghosh PK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK. 2002. Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23(5), 337–345. http://dx.doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00058-2

Meisterling K, Samaras C, Schweizer V. 2009. Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 222– 230. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.009

Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin Sh, Rafiee Sh, Keyhani A. 2008. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management 49, 3566-3570. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.07.003

Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Karadeniz F. 2004. Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 45, 1821-1830. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2003.10.002

Pishgar-Komleh SH, Ghahderijani M, Sefeedpari P. 2012. Energy consumption and CO2 emissions  analysis  of  potato  production  based  on different farm size levels in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 33, 183-191. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.008

Rajabi Hamedani S, Shabani Z, Rafiee S. 2011. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 36, 2367-2371. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.013

Schroll H. 1994. Energy-flow and ecological sustainability in Danish agriculture. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 51, 301–310. http://dx.doi:10.1016/0167-8809(94)90142-2

Soni P, Taewichit C, Salokhe VM. 2013. Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in rainfed agricultural production systems of Northeast Thailand. Agricultural Systems 116, 25 –36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.006

Uhlin H. 1998. Why energy productivity is increasing: an I–O analysis of Swedish agriculture. Agricultural Systems 56(4), 443–65. http://dx.doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00059-0

Yamane T. 1967. Elementary sampling theory. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Zangeneh M, Omid M, Akram A. 2010. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 35, 2927-2933. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.024

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.