Estimate energy, energy balance and economic indices of watered farming Potato Production in North of Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2013
Views (799)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Estimate energy, energy balance and economic indices of watered farming Potato Production in North of Iran

Ebrahim Azarpour, Maral Moraditochaee, Hamid Reza Bozorgi
Int. J. Biosci. 3(11), 48-56, November 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

One way to evaluation of sustainable developing in agriculture is using of energy flow method. This method in an agricultural product system is the energy consuming in product operations and energy saving in produced crops. In this article, evaluation of energy balance and energy indices under rain fed farming potato in north of Iran (Guilan province) was investigated. Data were collected from 72 farms by used a face to face questionnaire method during 2010 year in Guilan province. By using of consumed data as inputs and total production as output, and their concern equivalent energy, energy balance and energy indices were calculated. Energy efficiency (energy output to input energy ratio) for watered farming potato production in this study was calculated 3.48, showing the affective use of energy in the agro ecosystems potato production. Energy balance efficiency (production energy to consumption energy ratio) for watered farming potato production in this study was calculated 2.58, showing the affective use of energy in the agro ecosystems potato production.

Anonymous. 2010. Annual Agricultural Statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran;

Azarpour E, Moradi M. 2013. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of Rice Varieties under Traditional and Semi-mechanized Farming Systems in North of Iran. biomass now –sustainable growth and use, InTech-Open Access Company 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51165

Izadkhah M, Tajbahksh M, Hassanzadeh A. 2010. Evolution and compared energy balance of potato production for traditional and mechanized Farming Systems in Azarbijan province, Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(2), 284-297.

Karkacier  O,  Gokalp  Goktolga  Z,  Cicek  A, 2006. “A regression analysis of the effect of energy use in agriculture. Energy Policy 34(18), 3796-3800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.001

Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. 2008. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management 49, 3566-3570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.07.003

Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C. 2004. Energy input output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy 29, 39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00135-6

Rajabi Hamedani S, Shabani Z, Rafiee S. 2010. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 36, 2367-2371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.013

Sieczka JB, Thornton RE. Commercial potato production in North America: potato association of America handbook, Orono, Maine Potato Association of America 57, 267.

Tabatabaeefar A, Emamzadeh H, Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M, Rahimizadeh R, Karimi M. 2009. Comparison of energy of tillage systems in wheat production. Energy 34, 41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.023

Yamane T. 1967. Elementary sampling theory. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice- Hall Inc.

Zangeneh M, Omid M, Akram A. 2010. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy. 35, 2927-2933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.024

Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B. 2005. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30, 145-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.

Comparative predictive performance of anthropometric indices and associated risk factors for obesity among Beninese adults: A cross-sectional study

Ganlaky D. Boris, Sègbo Julien A. Gaetan*, Dossou David, Sossa J. Charles, Akpovi D. Casimir, Agbangla Clement, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 105-117, August 2026.

Proximate, mineral and vitamin composition of Uvaria chamae P. Beauv. (Annonaceae) seed flour from Korhogo, northern Côte d’Ivoire

Nyamien Yves Bleouh Jean*, Anon Attoh Hyacinthe, Diallo Koffi, Biego Godi Henri, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 97-104, August 2026.

Acute toxicity of seeds from Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex A. Rich.) Harms

Wilfried Zanmenou*, Razack Osseni, Mahouglo Barnabé Houessou, Chimène Agrippine Rodogune Yelouassi, Comlan Kintomagnimessè Célestin Tchekessi, Philippe Sessou, Anatole Laleye, Pierre Dossou-Yovo, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 89-96, August 2026.

Stabilization of cashew apple juice with chitosan: clarification and microbiological quality

Kokora Aya Philomène*, Coulibaly Adama, Cissé Mohamed, Coulibaly Bintou, Konan N’guessan Ysidor, Godi Henri Marius Biego, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 76-88, August 2026.

Implementation and evaluation of limited face to face classes: basis for adoption of health and safety manual

Christian Jude B. Calunsag*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 65-75, August 2026.