Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Evaluation of Different Growing Substrates on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) under Non – Circulating Hydroponic System

Research Paper | January 1, 2021

| Download 71

Michael M. Uy, Florentino M. Tomaneng, Gerald L. Seridon

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.18( 1), 93-101, January 2021

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/18.1.93-101


IJB 2021 [Generate Certificate]


Hydroponic technology has many benefits that it is highly productive and conserves water and land most especially if natural resources are scarce. Normally, plants grow inside a greenhouse that controls temperature, light, water and nutrition. The study was conducted to evaluate the performance of different growing substrates on lettuce under a non-circulating hydroponics system. It was conducted at Cagayan State University – Piat Campus from September to October 2019. The Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four replications was used to test the following treatments: T1 – Rockwool, T2– Coco peat, T3 – Carbonized Rice Hull (CRH) and T4 – Sawdust. Results show that plants under coco coir (T2)–obtained the tallest and longest roots while the most number of leaves and heaviest fresh biomass was registered in rock wool (T1). In terms of water pH, the result revealed no significant differences among treatment means. In the absence of rock wool, the coco coir can be used as an alternative as growing substrates for a non-circulating hydroponics system since they did not differ significantly.


Copyright © 2021
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Evaluation of Different Growing Substrates on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) under Non – Circulating Hydroponic System

Abad A, Noguera P, Burés S. 2001. National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant production: Case study in Spain. Bioresource Technology 77, 197-200.

Dorais M, Papadopoulos A, Gosselin A. 2001. Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. Horticultural Reviews 1(26), 239-319.

Ghehsared AM, Hematian M, Kalbasi M. 2012. Comparison of date-palm wastes and perlite as culture substrates on growing indices in greenhouse cucumber. In: The 1th International and the 4th National Congress on Recycling of Organic waste in agriculture 26-27.

Grillas S, Lucas M, Bardopoulou E, Sarafopoulos S, Voulgari M. 2001. Perlite based soilless culture systems: Current commercial applications and prospects. Acta Horticulturae 548, 105-114.

Gruda N. 2009. Do soilless culture systems have influence on product quality of vegeta‐ bles? Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 82, 141-147.

Jensen M. 1997. Food production in greenhouses. In: Plant Production in Closed Ecosystems: The International Symposium on Plant Production in Closed Ecosystems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; p 1-14.

Kristkova E, Dolezalova I, Lebeda A, Vinter V, Novotna A. 2008. Description of Morphological Characters of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Genetic Resources. Horticultural Science (Prague) 35(3), 113– 129.

Ma YB, Nichols DG. 2004. Phytotoxicity and detoxification of fresh coir dust and coconut shell. Commun. Soil Science Plant Analysis 35(1&2), 205-218.

Shinohara Y, Hata T, Maruo T, Hohjo M. (1999). Chemical and physical properties of the coconut-fiber substrate and the growth and productivity of tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.) plants. Acta Horticulturae 481, 145-150.

Tian Y, Sun X, Li S, Wang H, Wang L, Cao J. Zhang L. 2012. Biochar made from green waste as peat substitute in growth media for Calathea rotundifola cv. Fasciata. Scientia Horticulturae 143, 15-18.