Evaluation of forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] lines for drought tolerance at germination stage

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (1001)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] lines for drought tolerance at germination stage

Zahra Khodarahmpour
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 16-22, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Drought is a major factor which limits growth and development of higher plants. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of drought on the germination and early growth of forage sorghum lines. In order to an experiment was performed as factorial form under completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 replications. Line factor contained 15 lines and 5 levels of drought (control, -3, -6, -9 and -12 bar) with PEG 6000. Results showed that the most negative and significant correlation had between germination rate and mean germination time (r=-0.98**) and the most positive and significant correlation had between root length and seedling length (r=0.99**). Factor analysis based on principal component analysis showed that three independent factors, respectively, 52, 21 and 10% of all variation data determined. In the first component germination percentage, germination rate, root length, seedling length, index seed vigour and dry weight of seedling positive factor coefficients were shown. In the second component mean germination time, root/shoot length ratio and dry/wet weight ratio negative factor coefficients and shoot length positive factor coefficient were shown. In the three component reduced germination negative factor coefficient was shown. Based biplot, lines of KFS2, KFS3, KFS6, KFS7, KFS8, KFS9, KFS10, KFS11 and KFS12 were low sensitive to drought stress and lines KFS1, KFS13, KFS15, KFS16, KFS17 and KFS18 were high sensitive to drought stress.

Agrama HA, Tuinstra MR. 2003. Phylogenetic diversity and relationships among sorghum accessions using SSRs and RAPDs. African Journal of Biotechnology 2(10), 334-340.

Ali MA, Nawab NN, Abbas A, Zulkiffal M, Sajjad M. 2009. Evaluation of selection criteria in Cicer arietinum L. using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Australian Journal of Crop Science 3, 65-70.

Aslam M, Khan IA, Saleem MD, Ali Z. 2006. Assessment of water stress tolerance in different maize accessions at germination and early growth stage. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38(5), 1571-1579.

Basafa M, Taherian M. 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ecotypes using drought tolerance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 3(1), 69-81 (in Persian).

Bibi A, Sadaqat HA, Akram HM, Mohammed MI. 2010 Physiological markers for screening sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) germplasm under water stress condition. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 12, 451–455.

Bibi A, Sadaqat HA, Tahir MHN, Akram HM. 2012. Screening of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Var Monech) for drought tolerance at seedling stage in polyethylene Glycol. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22(3), 671-678.

Bruce BW, Gregory OE, Barker TC. 2002. Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.366.13

Figueiredo-e-Albuquerque MC, De Carvalho NM. 2003. Effect of type of environmental stress on the emergence of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril] and maize (Zea mays L.) seeds with different levels of vigour. Seed Science and Technology 31, 465-69.

Fisher D. 1985. In situ measurement of plant water potentials by equilibration with microdroplets of polyethylene glycol 8000. Plant Physiology 79, 270-273.

Gill  RK,  Sharma  AD,  Singh  P,  Bhullar  SS. 2002. Osmotic stress induced changes in germination, growth and soluble sugar content of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seeds. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 28, 12- 25.

ISTA (International Seed Testing Association) 1996. International rules for seed testing rules. Seed Science and Technology 24, 155-202.

Jaber Hosseini S, Tahmasebi Sarvestani Z, Pirdashti HA. 2012. Responses of some rice genotypes to drought stress. International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review 2(4), 475-482.

Khalesro SH, Aghaalikhani M. 2007. Effect of salinity and water deficit stress on seed germination. Research and Creativity 77, 153-63. (in Persian).

Khodarahmpour Z. 2013. Screening of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivar for drought tolerance at germination stage and seedling growth. Research on Crops 14(2), 571-575.

Martinez-Calvo J, Gisbert AD, Alamar MC, Hernandorena R, Romero C, Liacer G, Badenes ML. 2008. Study of a germplasm collection of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) by multivariate  analysis.  Genetic  Resources  and  Crop Evolution 55(5), 695-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9276-8

Matsuura A, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y. 1996. Mechanism of interspecific differences among four graminaceous crops in growth response to soil drying. Japanese Journal of Crop Sciences 65, 352-360

Rauf S, Sadaqat HA, Khan IA. 2008. Effect of moisture regimes on combining ability variations of seedling traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 88, 323-329.

Rauf S. 2008. Breeding sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for drought tolerance. Communication in Biometry and Crop Science 3(1), 29-44.

Zaheri A, Bahraminejad S. 2012. Assessment of drought tolerance in oat (Avena sativa) genotypes. Annals of Biological Research 3(5), 2194-2201

Zheng J, Fu J, Gou M, Huai J, Liu Y, Jian M, Huang Q, Guo X, Dong Z, Wang H, Wang G. 2010. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of two maize inbred lines under drought stress. Plant Molecular Biology 72, 407-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-009-9579-6

Related Articles

Intra-population genetic diversity modeling of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) population in Niger

Adamou Ibrahim Maman Laouali*, Zango Oumarou, Alio Moussa Abdourazak, Rafiou Abdoulaye, Idi Saidou Sani, Idi Garba Nana Mariama, Bakasso Yacoubou, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 62-70, September 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous Trichoderma isolates against Fusarium wilt of cotton in Tanzania: In vitro screening and screen-house validation

Fauzia Khalid Mpiganzila*, Alfonce Leonard, Lidia Munuo, Ernest Mbega, Agatha Aloyce, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 44-61, September 2026.

In vitro study of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic activity of medicinal plants

T. K. Nishath*, P. Mathavi, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 32-43, September 2026.

Association between the IL13 rs1800925 (-1112C/T) polymorphism and Schistosoma mansoni infection intensity in a population from western Côte d’Ivoire

Bernardin Ahouty Ahouty*, Abla Edwige Sokouri, Georges Bohoussou Kassi, Innocent Allépo Abé, Martial Kassi N’djetchi, Yaya Ouangbo Ouattara, Ornella Karmelle Lydia Dago, Mathurin Yao Koffi, Thomas Konan Konan, Mathurin N’Goran Koffi, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 20-31, September 2026.

Abattoir-based surveillance reveals geographic clustering and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in Tanzania

Yohana Siyajali Anatory*, Beatus Lyimo, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Joram Buza, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 11-19, September 2026.

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.