Evaluation of silage quality of three sorghum varieties using in livestock systems of Burkina Faso
Paper Details
Evaluation of silage quality of three sorghum varieties using in livestock systems of Burkina Faso
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the physicochemical, microbiological and nutritional quality of silage from three improved sorghum varieties (Sariaso 14, Sariaso 15 and Sariaso 16) used in livestock farming systems in Burkina Faso. The sorghum stover were harvested after the grain harvest and ensiled with four treatments: without additives, with molasses, with salt, and with molasses + salt for 120 days. After 120 days, the fermentation parameters differed according to the varieties and additives. The pH of the silages ranged from 3.71 to 4.64, with the lowest values observed in Sariaso 16 ensiled with salt. The highest titratable acidity (18.36 g/kg DM) was obtained in the molasses + salt treatments, indicating more intense fermentation. From a microbiological perspective, the aerobic bacteria loads were lowest in molasses + salt silage (3.41×10⁶ CFU/g DM) compared to the control (1×10⁸ CFU/g FM). In addition, there was a reduction in yeasts and moulds, especially in the molasses + salt treatment (4.06×10⁵ CFU/g FM). Bromatological analysis showed significant differences (p<0.05) between varieties and treatments. Sariaso 16 sorghum stalks treated with molasses/molasses + salt had the best nutritional values: high crude protein (3.33–3.41% DM), higher metabolisable energy (≈7.5 MJ/kg DM) and high digestibility (IVDOM > 51%). The results of the study show that improved varieties, particularly Sariaso 16, combined with the use of additives, are an effective strategy for producing high-quality silage. These results also demonstrate that variety selection, combined with the addition of additives, is a major lever for optimising the quality of sorghum silage and securing feed for ruminants during the dry season in Burkina Faso’s livestock systems.
AFNOR. 1970. Association Française de Normalisation T90-014, détermination du pH, 4p.
AFNOR. 1974. NF V05–101: produits dérivés des fourrages ensilés: détermination de l’acidité titrable, 4p.
Barro-Kondombo CP, Broke KV, Chantereau J, Sagnard F, Zongo JD. 2008. Variabilité phénotypique des sorghos locaux de deux régions du Burkina Faso: la Boucle du Mouhoun et le Centre-Ouest. Cahiers d’Agricultures 17(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2008.0175
Bennani LM, Aarab A, Jaber A, Acherkouk M, Ayadi M. 2022. Silage preserves the nutritional quality of Melilotus officinalis better than haying. African and Mediterranean Agricultural Journal – Al Awamia 136, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/afrimed-i136.34907
Cai Y, Du Z, Delma BJ, Nignan M, Yamasaki S. 2020b. Analysis of main factors affecting silage fermentation of sorghum prepared with whole crop and stover in semiarid West Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 38(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1794959
Cai Y, Du Z, Yamasaki S, Delma BJ, Nignan M. 2020a. Chemical composition, characteristics concerned with fermentative quality and microbial population of ensiled pearl millet and sorghum stover in semi-arid West Africa. Animal Science Journal 91(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13463
Cai Y. 2004. Field and laboratory methods for grassland science. In: Japanese Society of Grassland Science (ed.), Analysis method for silage, Tokyo: Tosho Printing Co., Ltd., 279–282.
Cussen RF, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Tweed JKS. 1995. The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content. Grass and Forage Science 50(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02320.x
Davies DR, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Bakewell EL, Leemans DK, Tweed JKS. 1998. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75596-1
DGESS(CPSA)/MAAHM. 2021. Résultats définitifs de la campagne agricole 2020/2021.
Handriati LN, Suhartanto B, Widodo S, Dewi MP, Umami N. 2019. Effect of sorghum varieties and molasses addition on prussic acid content and silage quality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 387, 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/387/1/012062
Hartutik Marjuki, Huda AN, Ndaru PN, Arsianty YN, Rohmah BN. 2021. The use of molasses as additive with different ensiling time and physical quality, pH and nutritive value of maize stover silage. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis 4(2), 88–92. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2314/f995339bddd13994110fe9957fd2e7dd8ae9.pdf
Hassanat FM. 2007. Evaluation of pearl millet forage. PhD thesis, Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 192p.
Keskin B, Yilmaz İH, Karsli MA, Nursoy H. 2005. Effects of urea or urea plus molasses supplementation to silages with different sorghum varieties harvested at the milk stage on the quality and in vitro dry matter digestibility of silages. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 29(5), 1143–1147. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2698&context=veterinary
Khota W, Pholsen S, Higgs D, Cai Y. 2017. Fermentation quality and in vitro methane production of sorghum silage prepared with cellulase and lactic acid bacteria. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 30, 1568–1574. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0502
Korombé HS, Bado VB, Abdou N, Umutoni C, Ibrahima A, Gouro AS. 2023. Evaluation of fermentation progress during storage of millet stovers silage based on pH indicators. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research 13(2), 116–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2023.18
Lukkananukool A, Srikijkasemwat K, Promnaret A, Aung M, Kyawt YY. 2019. Fermented juice of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria and molasses addition on the fermentation characteristics and nutrient compositions of sorghum silage. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 7(8), 668–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.8.668.673
Luo R, Zhang Y, Wang F, Liu K, Huang G, Zheng N, Wang J. 2021. Effects of sugar cane molasses addition on the fermentation quality, microbial community, and taste of alfalfa silage. Animals 11, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020355
Mahala AG, Khalifa IM. 2007. The effect of molasses levels on quality of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) silage. Research Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2, 43–46. https://www.aensiweb.net/AENSIWEB/rjavs/rjavs/2007/43-46.pdf
McLaughlin AM, Erickson PS, Hussey JS, Reid ED, Tanguay JA. 2002. Case study: NaCl addition to the top layer of corn ensiled in bunker silos. Professional Animal Scientist 18, 90–92. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&context=nhaes
Mfoukou-Ntsakala A, Massengo J, Boussiengue R. 2009. Caractéristiques fermentaires, ingestion volontaire et digestibilité de l’ensilage de Pennisetum King Grass chez le mouton djallonké. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 56(4). https://doi.org/10.4314/bahpa.v56i4.43306
Nebie B. 2014. Diversité génétique des sorghos à tige sucrée (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) du Burkina Faso. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Ouagadougou, 118 p.
Neves ALA, Santos RD, Pereira LGR, Oliveira GF, Scherer CB, Verneque RS, McAllister T. 2015. Agronomic characteristics, silage quality, intake and digestibility of five new Brazilian sorghum cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science 153, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185961400063X
Nursoy H, Deniz S, Demirel M, Denek N. 2003. The effect of urea and molasses addition into corn harvested at the milk stage on silage quality and digestible nutrient yield. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 27(1), 93–99. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3216&context=veterinary
Ouédraogo N, Kouraogo I, Drabo E, Waongo A, Sawadogo AWP, Nébié B, Gracen V, Raboin LM. 2024. Determination of twelve sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varietal status to midge damage in a hotspot area of Burkina Faso. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 27(11), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i111712
Singh D, Chauhan A, Chaudhary A. 2020. Evaluation of maize cultivars for forage yield, silage quality traits and nutrient uptake in agro-climatic conditions of central Gujarat, India. Range Management and Agroforestry 41(1), 133–140. https://rmaj.in/rma/article/view/85
Terler G, Resch R, Gappmaier S, Gruber L. 2021. Nutritive value for ruminants of different fresh and ensiled sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties harvested at varying maturity stages. Archives of Animal Nutrition 75(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2021.1924016
Thomas ME, Foster JL, McCuistion KC, Redmon LA, Jessup RW. 2013. Nutritive value, fermentation characteristics, and in situ disappearance kinetics of sorghum silage treated with inoculants. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 7120–7131. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6635
Vu VH, Li X, Wang M, Liu R, Zhang G, Liu W, Xia B, Sun Q. 2019. Dynamics of fungal community during silage fermentation of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) produced in northern Vietnam. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Sciences 32, 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0708
Zampaligré N, Yoda G, Delma J, Sanfo A, Balehegn M, Rios E, Dubeux JC, Boote K, Adesogan A. 2021. Four-packed biomass, nutritional value and yield in grains of améliorées cereal crops à double usage in Burkina Faso. Journal of Agronomy, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20860
Zhao ZY, Che P, Glassman K, Albertsen M. 2019. Nutritionally enhanced sorghum for the arid and semiarid tropical areas of Africa. In: Zhao ZY, Dahlberg J (eds), Sorghum, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1931. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9039-9_14
Barkwendé Jethro Delma, François Tapsoba, Nabèrè Ouattara, Gildas Marie Louis Yoda, 2025. Evaluation of silage quality of three sorghum varieties using in livestock systems of Burkina Faso. Int. J. Biosci., 27(6), 72-81.
Copyright © 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.