Evaluation of some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of 5 cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) grown in Hormozgan Province

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2015
Views (375) Download (7)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of 5 cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) grown in Hormozgan Province

Shiva Ghasemi, Mostafa Ghasemi, Khadijeh Abbaszadeh, Morteza Salari
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.6( 5), 62-65, May 2015.
Certificate: IJAAR 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The goal of this investigation was to evaluate some qualitative and quantitative traits in fruits of five tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) cultivars. These traits were vitamin C content, pH, total soluble solids (TSS), titrable acidity, fruit diameter, fruit volume, fruit firmness, fresh weight and dry weight. Studied cultivars were Matin F1, Yaghoot, Sunseed, Sadeen and Raha. The results showed that there were significant differences in evaluated parameters among cultivars. The highest contents of vitamin C (36.32 mg. 100 g-1), diameter (6.77 cm), volume (221.25 cm3), firmness (2.45 Kg. cm-2), fresh weight (194.29 g) and dry weight (11.3 g) were belonged to the cultivar Sunseed. The highest pH (4.3) and TSS (2.49 %) were belonged to the cultivars Yaghoot and Matin F1, respectively. The cultivar Yaghoot also showed the lowest contents of vitamin C (21.37 mg. 100 g-1), TSS ( 1.65 %), titrable acidity (0.274 %), diameter (5.3 cm), volume (158. 75 cm3), firmness (1.825 Kg. cm-2), fresh weight (102.55 g) and dry weight (6.19 g) in compare with other cultivars. Thus based on the results, the cultivar Sunseed can be as a valuable cultivar among other cultivars, because the highest contents of vitamin C, diameter, volume, firmness, fresh weight and dry weight were belonged to this cultivar. The findings of this study may provide suitable information about nutritional value of studied cultivars for food experts and other researchers.

VIEWS 11

Aboutalebi A, Hasanzadeh Khankahdani H, Zakeri E. 2012. Study on Yield and Quality of 16 Tomato Cultivars in South of Iran. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3, 838-841.

Barakat MZ, Shehab SK, Darwish N, El-Zoheiry A. 1973. A new titrimetric method for the determination of vitamin C. Analalytical Biochemistry 53, 245–251.

Benton Jones J. 2008. Tomato Plant Culture: In theField, Greenhouse and Home Garden. In: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. 81-86 p.

Edalatian MR, Mortazavi A, Hamedi M, Mazaheri-Tehrani M. 2005. Effect of variety and storing duration on chemical characteristics of tomato sauce derived four tomato varieties. Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resources 4, 211-220.

Gerrie VT, Victoria CMG. 2008. Comparison of tomato varieties grown in Victoria County. Agric Life Extension 4, 109-126.

Gould WA. 1983. Tomato production, processing and quality evaluation, 2nd edition.

Mansour A, Esmail HM, Ramadan MF, Gyulai G. 2009. Comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivars grown under two different seasons in Egypt. The African journal of plant science and biotechnology 25, 73-79.

McAvoy G, Ozores-Hampton M. 2010. Cultivar selection in tomato and pepper production. University of Florida 2, 38-43.

Mivechi-Langroodi H. 2000. Yield and quality comparison of 15 tomato cultivars in Boushehr province. Short Scientific Report. Seed and Plant Journal 16, 387-389.

Ness AR, Powles JW. 1997. Fruits and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 26, 1-13.

Zahedi SM, Alemzadeh Ansari N. 2012. Comparison in Quantity Characters (Flowering and Fruit Set) of Ten Selected Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes under Subtropical Climate Conditions (Ahvaz). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 12, 1437-1440.