Exotic Gmelina arborea Roxb. plantation supports better understory plant diversity than native Nauclea orientalis (L.) plantation 30 years after their establishment in a watershed area in Southern Philippines
Paper Details
Exotic Gmelina arborea Roxb. plantation supports better understory plant diversity than native Nauclea orientalis (L.) plantation 30 years after their establishment in a watershed area in Southern Philippines
Abstract
Native tree plantations are often preferred as nurse vegetation to facilitate succession as they are assumed to have favorable habitat for native species regeneration than exotic stands.. To ascertain this, we characterized the respective attributes of exotic Gmelina (Gmelina arborea Roxb., Lamiaceae) and native Bangkal (Nauclea orientalis L., Rubiaceae) plantations in terms of canopy structure, understory biomass and soil attributes; and relate these to the diversity and number of regenerating woody species in each stand. We found that exotic Gmelina plantation had significantly better species diversity(H = 1.06 ± 0.10) and species richness(42 species, 959 individuals)than Bangkal(H= 0.52 ± 0.27, 9 species, 584 indivisials). Majority of the species found in Gmelina are trees (64%), while Bangkal was dominated (90%) by herbaceous plants. Themore dense canopy structure in terms of canopy height (36.79 ± 12.37) in Gmelina in comparison to Bangkal (19.61 ± 0.75) appearedto favor woody species regeneration, thus suppressing the possible invasion by herbaceous plants. In contrast, the better soil CEC in Bangkal plantation (i.e. 51.00 ± 8.23 vs 40.20 ± 3.66 in Gmelina) has favored the growth of herbaceous plants and resulted to arrested succession.Thus, our findings suggest that exotic-based tree plantations in the country can beimportant successional sites and are not at all detrimental to biodiversity conservation as commonly perceived. Moreover, it is possible that without active interventions to accelerate the growth of native woody regeneration, succession in tree planrations can be vulnerable to invasionby herbaceous plants over time.
Acácio V, Holmgren M, Jansen PA, Schrotter O. 2007. Multiple recruitment limitation causes arrested succession in Mediterranean cork oak systems. Ecosystems, 10(7), 1220-1230.
Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, Rivera L, Marcano‐Vega H. 2000. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 8(4), 328-338.
Bremer LL, Farley KA. 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(14), 3893-3915.
Brewer A, Williamson M. 1994. A new relationship for rarefaction. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3(4), 373-379.
Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J. 2008. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 925-951.
Geldenhuys CJ. 1997. Native forest regeneration in pine and eucalypt plantations in Northern Province, South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management, 99(1), 101-115.
Grime JP. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, UK, 242(5396), 344-347.
Hairiah K, Dewi S, Agus F, Velarde S, Ekadinata A, Rahayu S, van Noordwijk M. 2011. Measuring carbon stocks: across land use systems: a manual: Published in close cooperation with Brawijaya University and ICALRRD (Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development).
Hobbs RJ. 2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: key directions for research. Restoration Ecology, 15(2), 354-357.
Hobbs RJ, Norton DA. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 4(2), 93-110.
Lee YK, Lee DK, Woo SY, Abraham ERG, Carandang WM, Yeo US, Park C. 2006a. Differences of tree species composition and microclimate between a mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) plantation and a secondary forest in Mt. Makiling, Philippines. Forest Science and Technology, 2(1), 1-12.
Lee YK, Lee DK, Woo SY, Park C, Jang Y, Abraham ERG. 2006b. Effect of Acacia plantations on net photosynthesis, tree species composition, soil enzyme activities, and microclimate on Mt. Makiling. Photosynthetica, 44(2), 299-308.
Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO: Cambridge university press.
Lugo AE, Parrotta JA, Brown S. 1993. Loss in species caused by tropical deforestation and their recovery through management. Biodiversity: Ecology, Economics, Policy, 22(2/3), 106-109.
McAleece N, Lambshead P, Paterson G, Gage J.1997. Biodiversity professional.
Otsamo R. 2000. Secondary forest regeneration under fast-growing forest plantations on degraded Imperata cylindrica grasslands. New Forests, 19(1), 69-93.
Parrotta JA. 1992. The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 41(2), 115-133.
Parrotta JA. 1995. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6(5), 627-636.
Parrotta JA, Knowles OH, Wunderle JM. 1997. Development of floristic diversity in 10-year-old restoration forests on a bauxite mined site in Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 99(1), 21-42.
Poudel D, West L. 1999. Soil development and fertility characteristics of a volcanic slope in Mindanao, the Philippines. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5), 1258-1273.
Putz F, Canham C. 1992. Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands: root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 49(3-4), 267-275.
R Development Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Royo AA, Carson WP. 2006. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(6), 1345-1362. doi:10.1139/x06-025.
Ruiz-Jaén MC, Aide TM. 2005. Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1), 159-173.
Sarmiento FO. 1997. Arrested succession in pastures hinders regeneration of Tropandean forests and shreds mountain landscapes. Environmental Conservation, 24(1), 14-23.
SER (Society for Ecological RestorationInternational Science & Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Retrieved from http//www.ser.org
Stumpf K. 2008. The GRS Densitometer. Geographic Resource Solutions, Arcata.
Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(1), 46-53.
Tambosi LR, Martensen AC, Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP. 2014. A framework to optimize biodiversity restoration efforts based on habitat amount and landscape connectivity. Restoration Ecology, 22(2), 169-177.
Tulod AM, Casas JV, Marin RA, Ejoc JAB. 2017. Diversity of native woody regeneration in exotic tree plantations and natural forest in Southern Philippines. Forest Science and Technology, 13(1), 31-40.
Viisteensaari J, Johansson S, Kaarakka V, Luukkanen O. 2000. Is the alien tree species Maesopsis eminii Engl. (Rhamnaceae) a threat to tropical forest conservation in the East Usambaras, Tanzania? Environmental Conservation, 27(1), 76-81.
Young TP, Petersen D, Clary J. 2005. The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology letters, 8(6), 662-673.
Zanne AE, Chapman CA. 2001. Expediting reforestation in tropical grasslands: distance and isolation from seed sources in plantations. Ecological Applications, 11(6), 1610-1621.
Jupiter V. Casas, Adrian M. Tulod, Lowell G. Aribal, Jose Hermis P. Patricio, 2017. Exotic Gmelina arborea Roxb. plantation supports better understory plant diversity than native Nauclea orientalis (L.) plantation 30 years after their establishment in a watershed area in Southern Philippines. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 11(2), 134-147.
Copyright © 2017 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.