Genomic data mining through python language

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (1236)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Genomic data mining through python language

Rashid Saif, Kinza Qazi, Talha Tamseel, Saeeda Zia
Int. J. Biosci. 11(3), 116-125, September 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Pythonis a rigorous programming language, which may be used for many purposes including genomic data mining. This language was designed to emphasize on code readability and syntax, which allows programmer to express code in lesser space with comprehensive and exhaustive manner. Different analysis through Python can be conducted during dry labs sessions, which infer concrete and generalizable results from the wet lab genomic experiments, such as gene expression analysis, phylogenetic, GC percentage and gene sequencing. In this article, built-in Python functions like variables, stings, operators and formatting styles are introduced, and short programs are structured, implemented and executed. Basic operators are used to perform calculations through this language, gene sequences are analyzed and small built-in functions e.g. “length, print, integers and types” of Python are also conversed in this communication. Case sensitive commands are elaborated to avoid errors during the process of computing. This endeavor also shed light on the topic that how different Python methods and functions may be used to compute data structures, dictionaries, sets, lists, tuples, loops and statements on the genomic sequences. Finally, different programs are constructed to count undefined bases in a given sequence with the help of statement, condition functions based on Boolean expressions, loops function are also used to analyze undefined amino acids present in protein sequences with the help of “for” and “while” loops.

Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2014. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32(2), 166-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638

Cock PJ, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox  CJ, Dalke A, Friedberg I, Hamelryck T, Kauff F, Wilczynski B. 2009. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25(11), 1422-1423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163

Goodstadt L. 2010. Ruffus: a lightweight Python library for computational pipelines. Bioinformatics 26(21), 2778-2779. www.10.1093/bioinformatics/btq524

Hamelryck T, Manderick B. 2003. PDB file parser and structure class implemented in Python. Bioinformatics 19(17), 2308-2310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg299

Mann C. 2010. Python for bioinformatics. Kybernetes 39(8) http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/k.2010.06739hae.004

Lesk A. 2013. Introduction to bioinformatics. Oxford University Press.

List M, Ebert P, Albrecht F. 2017. Ten Simple Rules for Developing Usable Software in Computational Biology. PLOS Computational Biology 13(1), e1005265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005265

Oliphant TE. 2007. Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering 9(3), 10-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2007.58

Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(8), 2444-2448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444

Perkins J. 2010. Python text processing with NLTK 2.0 cookbook. Packt Publ.

Przulj N. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on biological networks. Internet Mathematics 7(4), 207-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427951.2011.621769

Related Articles

Effects of supplementary irrigation, organic and mineral fertilizers on the agrophysiological performance of three varieties of millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R. Br.) in Burkina Faso

Hadara Nomba Ouedraogo*, Ahmed Traore, Ouènian Zibihako, Adama Pascal Kihindo, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 200-210, July 2026.

Physico-chemical composition and phytochemical screening of cocoa mass purchased commercially in Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire)

Attoh Hyacinthe Anon*, Hermann Fourier Atta Anno, Nyamien Yves Bleouh Jean, Fagbohoun Jean Bedel, Kouassi kouame Henri Joel, Patrice Lucien Kouamé, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 188-199, July 2026.

Survey of swine diseases and treatment approaches in Korhogo subprefecture, northern of Côte d’Ivoire

Kouhana Soro*, Ghislaine Sègbédji Théodora Atchade, Koffi Jules Gossé, Nea Yves Noma, Assanvo Simon-Pierre N’guetta, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 171-179, July 2026.

Length-weight relationship and population structure of pool barb (Puntius sophore) from Jashore, Bangladesh

Md. Almamun Farid*, Abu Shale Md. Nasim, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 160-170, July 2026.

Role of the Kogle-zanga biopesticide in improving amaranth leaf production in Loumbila

Drabo Samuel Fogné*, Nikiéma Dominique, Zézouma Anselme Dao, Romba Rahim, Sedogo Sanata, Gnankine Olivier, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 149-159, July 2026.

Systematic review evaluating locally sourced food resources alternatives to standard milk-based ready-to-use therapeutic food

Folachodé Ulrich Gildas Akogou*, Janvier Mêlégnonfan Kindossi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Anihouvi, Gamèli Justin Gandeho, Carole Nadia Adjouavi Sossa – Vihotogbé, Franck Hongbété, Polycarpe Kayodé, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 138-148, July 2026.

Clinical importance of stem cells in T2D treatment: A systematic review

Mirza Masroor Ali Beg*, Nilam Bhasker, Tridiv Katiyar, Amar Chandra Sharma, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 130-137, July 2026.