Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (661)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Tika Khan, Shamsher Ali, Imtiaz Ahmed Khan, Jan Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 293-297, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seabuckthorn is an important medicinal plant. Present study investigates growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis cuttings towards different agro-climatic conditions. Experiment was designed according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Cuttings were treated with 50 ppm NAN solution for 24 hours and growth pattern was monitored closely for 12 months regularly. Results showed significant effect of different climatic conditions and planting periods on sprouting (70.74%-93.16%), plant height (21.10 cm-27.75 cm), number of branches (4.40 – 7.12 per plant), number of roots (2.00 – 3.12 per plant), roots length (7.22 – 10.90 cm), root weight (1.00 – 1.96 g), survival percentage (68.78% – 90.59%) and overall health indicator (25.22 – 33.39). Selection of appropriate species with best suited planting period and established treatment will benefit Seabuckthorn growers for better yield, increased productivity and reasonable cash returns.

Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen W, Blom J, Hussdanell K, Harkink R. 1983. Utilization of carbon and nitrogen compounds of Frankia in synthetic media and in root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Hippophae rhamnoides and Datisca cannabina. Canadian Journal of Botany 61(11), 2793-2800 Retrieved from. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b 83-309 on September 8, 2013.

Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1978. Hortus third, A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. McMillan Publ. Co., New York. 337.

Baloch A. 1993. Horticulture.phases of plant growth, National Book Foundation, Isamabad. 63 p.

Bernath J, Foldesi D. 1992. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): a promising new medicinal and food crop. Journal ofHerbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 1, 27–35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J044 v01n01_04#.UjLx5DaD-So on September 13, 2013

Gurevick SK. 1956. The application of sea buckthorn oil on ophthalmology. Vesttin. Ohamologu 2, 30–33.

Heinze M, Fiedler HJ. 1981. Experimental planting of potash waste dumps. I. Communication: Pot experiments with trees and shrubs under various water and nutrient conditions. Archiv Acker Pflanzen. Bodenkunde 25, 315–322.

Hue Shuhua et al. 1989. Studies on the techniques for Seabuckthorn Hardwood Cutting Culture” In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). 217-227 p, Xian, China.

Li TSC, McLoughlin C. 1997. Sea buckthorn production guide. Canada Sea Buckthorn Enterprises Ltd. Peachland, British Columbia.

Li TSC, Schroeder WR. 1996. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A multipurpose plant. Horticultural Technology 6, 370–380.

Li TSC, Wang LCH. 1998. Physiological components and health effects of ginseng, echinacea and sea buckthorn. In: G. Mazza (ed.), Functional foods, biochemical & processing aspects. Technomic Publications & Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

Lu R. 1992. Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International. Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal.

Rousi A. 1971. The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. Annales Botanici Fennici 8, 177–227.

Synge PM. 1974. Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopedia of horticulture. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Xu M. 1994. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 7, 32–34.

Related Articles

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.

Nutritional and phytochemical characteristics of Garcinia afzelii fruit

Doumbia Fanta*, Dje Kouakou Martin, Kone Daouda, Silue Sana Etienne, Kouame Lucien Patrice , Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 17-27, February 2026.

Sensory evaluation of horn snail (Telescopium telescopium) patty

Ma. Isabel P. Lanzaderas, Gilbert P. Panimdim, Proceso C. Valleser Jr.*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 7-16, February 2026.

Two years evolution of deltamethrin, malathion and pirimiphos-methyl resistance in Aedes aegypti from urban in peri urban sites of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Hyacinthe K. Toe*, Moussa W. Guelbeogo, Soumananaba Zongo, Aboubacar Sombie, Athanase Badolo, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 1-6, February 2026.

Physicochemical characterization of annatto seeds (Bixa orellana) sold in Ouagadougou and their oils extracted using chemical processes

Mah Alima Esther Traoré*, Adama Lodoun, Pingdwindé Marie Judith Samadoulougou-Kafando, Nestor Beker Dembélé, Kiswendsida Sandrine Léticia Dayamba, Charles Parkouda, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 169-178, January 2026.