Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (591)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Tika Khan, Shamsher Ali, Imtiaz Ahmed Khan, Jan Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 293-297, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seabuckthorn is an important medicinal plant. Present study investigates growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis cuttings towards different agro-climatic conditions. Experiment was designed according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Cuttings were treated with 50 ppm NAN solution for 24 hours and growth pattern was monitored closely for 12 months regularly. Results showed significant effect of different climatic conditions and planting periods on sprouting (70.74%-93.16%), plant height (21.10 cm-27.75 cm), number of branches (4.40 – 7.12 per plant), number of roots (2.00 – 3.12 per plant), roots length (7.22 – 10.90 cm), root weight (1.00 – 1.96 g), survival percentage (68.78% – 90.59%) and overall health indicator (25.22 – 33.39). Selection of appropriate species with best suited planting period and established treatment will benefit Seabuckthorn growers for better yield, increased productivity and reasonable cash returns.

Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen W, Blom J, Hussdanell K, Harkink R. 1983. Utilization of carbon and nitrogen compounds of Frankia in synthetic media and in root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Hippophae rhamnoides and Datisca cannabina. Canadian Journal of Botany 61(11), 2793-2800 Retrieved from. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b 83-309 on September 8, 2013.

Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1978. Hortus third, A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. McMillan Publ. Co., New York. 337.

Baloch A. 1993. Horticulture.phases of plant growth, National Book Foundation, Isamabad. 63 p.

Bernath J, Foldesi D. 1992. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): a promising new medicinal and food crop. Journal ofHerbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 1, 27–35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J044 v01n01_04#.UjLx5DaD-So on September 13, 2013

Gurevick SK. 1956. The application of sea buckthorn oil on ophthalmology. Vesttin. Ohamologu 2, 30–33.

Heinze M, Fiedler HJ. 1981. Experimental planting of potash waste dumps. I. Communication: Pot experiments with trees and shrubs under various water and nutrient conditions. Archiv Acker Pflanzen. Bodenkunde 25, 315–322.

Hue Shuhua et al. 1989. Studies on the techniques for Seabuckthorn Hardwood Cutting Culture” In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). 217-227 p, Xian, China.

Li TSC, McLoughlin C. 1997. Sea buckthorn production guide. Canada Sea Buckthorn Enterprises Ltd. Peachland, British Columbia.

Li TSC, Schroeder WR. 1996. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A multipurpose plant. Horticultural Technology 6, 370–380.

Li TSC, Wang LCH. 1998. Physiological components and health effects of ginseng, echinacea and sea buckthorn. In: G. Mazza (ed.), Functional foods, biochemical & processing aspects. Technomic Publications & Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

Lu R. 1992. Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International. Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal.

Rousi A. 1971. The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. Annales Botanici Fennici 8, 177–227.

Synge PM. 1974. Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopedia of horticulture. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Xu M. 1994. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 7, 32–34.

Related Articles

Evaluating the ecophysiological response of marine fungi to textile dye degradation potential

S. Sathya, G. Kanimozhi, A. Panneerselvam, Int. J. Biosci. 27(3), 12-21, September 2025.

Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of Biophytum sensitivum

H. P. Reni Christabel, T. S. Dhanaraj, V. Ramamurthy, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 300-305, August 2025.

Phytochemical and antibacterial screening of different solvent extracts of Mentha spicata

V. R. Rakhi, T. S. Dhanaraj, V. Ramamurthy, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 280-286, August 2025.

Physico-chemical characterization of soils in two peri-urban lowlands: Implications for the sustainability of rice cultivation in Korhogo (northern Côte d’Ivoire)

Konan Kouamé Firmin, Nangah Krogba Yves, Touré Béssimory, Coulibaly Tchowa Bintou, Kouassi Anoma Jonathan Christian, Bayala Roger, Bakayoko Sidiky, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 270-279, August 2025.

Yield performance assessment of different mustard cultivars under field conditions

Md. Khan Jahan Ali, Md. Moshiur Rahman, Kamrun Nahar, Sharmin Ara Jannat, Mst. Khadija Khatun, Sushan Chowhan, Md. Habibur Rahman, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 264-269, August 2025.

Species composition of xylomicobiota of some woody plants distributed in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva, V. Y. Hasanova, N. R. Namazov, B. N. Aliyeva, S. C. Garayeva, S. E. Nagiyeva, P. Z. Muradov, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 254-263, August 2025.