Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (786)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Tika Khan, Shamsher Ali, Imtiaz Ahmed Khan, Jan Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 293-297, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seabuckthorn is an important medicinal plant. Present study investigates growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis cuttings towards different agro-climatic conditions. Experiment was designed according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Cuttings were treated with 50 ppm NAN solution for 24 hours and growth pattern was monitored closely for 12 months regularly. Results showed significant effect of different climatic conditions and planting periods on sprouting (70.74%-93.16%), plant height (21.10 cm-27.75 cm), number of branches (4.40 – 7.12 per plant), number of roots (2.00 – 3.12 per plant), roots length (7.22 – 10.90 cm), root weight (1.00 – 1.96 g), survival percentage (68.78% – 90.59%) and overall health indicator (25.22 – 33.39). Selection of appropriate species with best suited planting period and established treatment will benefit Seabuckthorn growers for better yield, increased productivity and reasonable cash returns.

Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen W, Blom J, Hussdanell K, Harkink R. 1983. Utilization of carbon and nitrogen compounds of Frankia in synthetic media and in root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Hippophae rhamnoides and Datisca cannabina. Canadian Journal of Botany 61(11), 2793-2800 Retrieved from. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b 83-309 on September 8, 2013.

Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1978. Hortus third, A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. McMillan Publ. Co., New York. 337.

Baloch A. 1993. Horticulture.phases of plant growth, National Book Foundation, Isamabad. 63 p.

Bernath J, Foldesi D. 1992. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): a promising new medicinal and food crop. Journal ofHerbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 1, 27–35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J044 v01n01_04#.UjLx5DaD-So on September 13, 2013

Gurevick SK. 1956. The application of sea buckthorn oil on ophthalmology. Vesttin. Ohamologu 2, 30–33.

Heinze M, Fiedler HJ. 1981. Experimental planting of potash waste dumps. I. Communication: Pot experiments with trees and shrubs under various water and nutrient conditions. Archiv Acker Pflanzen. Bodenkunde 25, 315–322.

Hue Shuhua et al. 1989. Studies on the techniques for Seabuckthorn Hardwood Cutting Culture” In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). 217-227 p, Xian, China.

Li TSC, McLoughlin C. 1997. Sea buckthorn production guide. Canada Sea Buckthorn Enterprises Ltd. Peachland, British Columbia.

Li TSC, Schroeder WR. 1996. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A multipurpose plant. Horticultural Technology 6, 370–380.

Li TSC, Wang LCH. 1998. Physiological components and health effects of ginseng, echinacea and sea buckthorn. In: G. Mazza (ed.), Functional foods, biochemical & processing aspects. Technomic Publications & Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

Lu R. 1992. Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International. Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal.

Rousi A. 1971. The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. Annales Botanici Fennici 8, 177–227.

Synge PM. 1974. Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopedia of horticulture. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Xu M. 1994. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 7, 32–34.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.