Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (649)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Tika Khan, Shamsher Ali, Imtiaz Ahmed Khan, Jan Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 293-297, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seabuckthorn is an important medicinal plant. Present study investigates growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis cuttings towards different agro-climatic conditions. Experiment was designed according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Cuttings were treated with 50 ppm NAN solution for 24 hours and growth pattern was monitored closely for 12 months regularly. Results showed significant effect of different climatic conditions and planting periods on sprouting (70.74%-93.16%), plant height (21.10 cm-27.75 cm), number of branches (4.40 – 7.12 per plant), number of roots (2.00 – 3.12 per plant), roots length (7.22 – 10.90 cm), root weight (1.00 – 1.96 g), survival percentage (68.78% – 90.59%) and overall health indicator (25.22 – 33.39). Selection of appropriate species with best suited planting period and established treatment will benefit Seabuckthorn growers for better yield, increased productivity and reasonable cash returns.

Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen W, Blom J, Hussdanell K, Harkink R. 1983. Utilization of carbon and nitrogen compounds of Frankia in synthetic media and in root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Hippophae rhamnoides and Datisca cannabina. Canadian Journal of Botany 61(11), 2793-2800 Retrieved from. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b 83-309 on September 8, 2013.

Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1978. Hortus third, A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. McMillan Publ. Co., New York. 337.

Baloch A. 1993. Horticulture.phases of plant growth, National Book Foundation, Isamabad. 63 p.

Bernath J, Foldesi D. 1992. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): a promising new medicinal and food crop. Journal ofHerbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 1, 27–35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J044 v01n01_04#.UjLx5DaD-So on September 13, 2013

Gurevick SK. 1956. The application of sea buckthorn oil on ophthalmology. Vesttin. Ohamologu 2, 30–33.

Heinze M, Fiedler HJ. 1981. Experimental planting of potash waste dumps. I. Communication: Pot experiments with trees and shrubs under various water and nutrient conditions. Archiv Acker Pflanzen. Bodenkunde 25, 315–322.

Hue Shuhua et al. 1989. Studies on the techniques for Seabuckthorn Hardwood Cutting Culture” In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). 217-227 p, Xian, China.

Li TSC, McLoughlin C. 1997. Sea buckthorn production guide. Canada Sea Buckthorn Enterprises Ltd. Peachland, British Columbia.

Li TSC, Schroeder WR. 1996. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A multipurpose plant. Horticultural Technology 6, 370–380.

Li TSC, Wang LCH. 1998. Physiological components and health effects of ginseng, echinacea and sea buckthorn. In: G. Mazza (ed.), Functional foods, biochemical & processing aspects. Technomic Publications & Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

Lu R. 1992. Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International. Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal.

Rousi A. 1971. The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. Annales Botanici Fennici 8, 177–227.

Synge PM. 1974. Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopedia of horticulture. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Xu M. 1994. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 7, 32–34.

Related Articles

Evaluation of the impact of floristic diversity on the productivity of cocoa-based agroforestry systems in the new cocoa production area: The case of the Biankouma department (Western Côte d’Ivoire)

N'gouran Kobenan Pierre, Zanh Golou Gizele*, Kouadio Kayeli Anaïs Laurence, Kouakou Akoua Tamia Madeleine, N'gou Kessi Abel, Barima Yao Sadaiou Sabas, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 44-55, January 2026.

Utilization of locally sourced feed ingredients and their influence on the growth performance of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): A study in support of the school’s chicken multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Maricel F. Campańano, Joe Hmer Kyle T. Acorda, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Jojo D. Cauilan, John Michael U. Tabil, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 35-43, January 2026.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding malaria prevention and the use of long lasting insecticidal nets after mass distribution campaigns in northern Côte d’Ivoire

Donatié Serge Touré, Konan Fabrice Assouho*, Konan Rodolphe Mardoché Azongnibo, Ibrahim Kounady Ouattara, Foungoye Allassane Ouattara, Mamadou Doumbia, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 28-34, January 2026.

Characterization of stands and evaluation of carbon sequestration capacity of shea parklands (Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Gaertn., Sapotaceae) in the departments of Dabakala and Kong, Ivory Coast

Konan Nicolas Kouamé*, Lacina Fanlégué Coulibaly, Mohamed Sahabane Traoré, Eric-Blanchard Zadjéhi Koffi, Nafan Diarrassouba, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 1-15, January 2026.

Muscle type and meat quality of local chickens according to preslaughter transport conditions and sex in Benin

Assouan Gabriel Bonou*, Finagnon Josée Bernice Houéssionon, Kocou Aimé Edenakpo, Serge Gbênagnon Ahounou, Chakirath Folakè Arikè Salifou, Issaka Abdou Karim Youssao, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 241-250, December 2025.

Effects of micronutrients and timing of application on the agronomic and yield characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Princess Anne C. Lagcao, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 214-240, December 2025.