Screening at an early growth stage in maize (Zea mays L.) for detection of drought tolerant genotypes

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2020
Views (776)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Screening at an early growth stage in maize (Zea mays L.) for detection of drought tolerant genotypes

Usman Saleem, Naeem Akhtar, Muhammad Afzal, Salman Saleem, Muhammad Azmat, Shadab Shaukat
Int. J. Biosci. 16(3), 344-351, March 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Maize is the largest produced grain on earth and plays significant role in food security. The study was aimed to explore the genetic variation and the degree to which seedling characters of maize are associated with each other under normal and water deficit environment. Fifty maize genotypes were sown in sand culture in Completely Randomized Design under factorial arrangement with three repeats under different water regimes.  Pooled analysis of variance (two way) showed that all sources of variations were statistically significant except interaction of inbred lines × treatments for leaf relative water content (LRWC). Inbred line YP-12 exhibited maximum values for LRWC (68 %), Root length (34.23 cm), FRTWT (12.36 g), DRTWT (5.68 g) and root to shoot ratio (3.39) under water deficit regime. Maximum genetic advance (9.81) and heritability (93%) was recorded for dry root weight (DRTWT) under water deficit environment. Strong significant positive association was detected between fresh shoot weight (FRTWT), Leaf relative water content (LRWC) and fresh shoot weight (FSTWT) under water deficit environment. The YP-12 genotype considered as tolerant inbred line/genotype and could be used in maize developing program to tailor drought tolerant maize hybrids.

Aggarwal PK, Sinha SK. 1983. Relationship between mother shoot and tillers as criterion of selection for wide or specific adaptability to drought in wheat. Zacker-Planzenb 152, 310-320.

Ahmad N, Malagoli M, Wirtz M, Hell R. 2016. Drought stress in maize causes differential acclimation responses of glutathione and sulfur metabolism in leaves and roots. BMC Plant Biology 16, 247.

Ahsan M, Hussain MM, Farooq A, Khaliq I, Farooq J, Ali Q, Kashif M. 2011. Physio-genetic behaviour of maize seedlings at water deficit conditions. Cercetări Agronomiceîn Moldova 2, 41-49.

Alkhafaf SK, Hussain IA, Al Janabi KZ. 1985. Effect of soil water potential, irrigation method and plant density on cotton root growth under field conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Water Resources Research 4, 31–44.

Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA.

Bocev BV. 1963. Maize selection at an initial phase of development. Kukuruzu 1, 54.

Clarke JM, McCaig TN. 1982. Evaluation of techniques for screening for drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sciences 22, 503-506.

Cruz de Carvalho MH. 2008. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signaling & Behaviour 3, 156–165.

Haq A, Tahir MHN, Ahsan M, Ahamd R, Akram HM. 2015. Screening and inheritance pattern of maize seedlings under normal and water stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 13, 97-103.

Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RW. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environment variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal 47, 314–318.

Khan IA, Habib S, Sadaqat HA, Tahir MHN. 2004. Selection criteria based on seedling growth parameters in maize varieties under normal and water stress conditions. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 2, 252-256.

Kown SH, Torrie JH. 1964. Heritability and interrelationship of two soybean (Glycine max L.) populations. Crop Sciences 4, 196-198.

Luan M, Xu M, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Zhang C, Fan Y, Lang Z, Wang L. 2014. Family-wide survey of miR169s and NF-YAs and their expression profiles response to abiotic stress in maize roots. PLoS One 9, e91369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091369.

Mata CG, Lamattina L. 2001. Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress. Plant Physiology 126, 1196-1204.

Mehdi SS, Ahmad N, Ahsan M. 2001. Evaluation of S1 maize (Zea mays L.) families at seeding stage under drought conditions. International Journal of Biological Sciences 1, 4-6.

Mirza OK. 1956. Relationship of root development to drought resistance of plants. Indian Journal of Agronomy 1, 41–46.

Najeeb S, Rather AG, Parray GA, Sheikh FA, Razvi SM. 2009. Studies on genetic variability, genotypic correlation and path coefficient analysis in maize under high altitude temperate ecology of Kashmir. Maize Genetic Cooperation Newsletter 83, 1-8.

Ramadan HA, Al-Niemi SN. Hamdan TT. 1985 – Water stress, soil type and phosphorus effects on corn and soybean, I. Effect on growth. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3, 137-144.

Rekha G, Padmavathi G, Abhiash V, Kousik MBVN, Balachandran SM, Sundaram RM, Senguttuvel P. 2018.  A protocol for rapid screening if rice lines for seedling stage salinity tolerance. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 9, 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00124.2

Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2005. Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorous acquisition. Functional Plant Biology 32, 737–748.

Saleem S, Kashif M, Hussain M, Khan AS, Saleem MF. 2016a. Genetic behavior of morpho-physiological traits and their role for breeding drought tolerant wheat. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 48, 925-933.

Saleem S, Kashif M, Hussain M, Khan AS, Saleem MF. 2016b. Genetics of water deficit tolerance for some physiological and yield variables in triticum aestivum L. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 26, 731-738.

Saleem S, Tahir HN, Saleem U. 2011. Study of genetic variability in maize inbred lines under normal irrigated and drought conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences 3, 80-85.

Sharp RE. 2002. Interaction with ethylene: changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25, 211–22.

Tavakol E, Pakniyat H. 2007. Evaluation of some drought resistance criteria at seedling stage in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10, 1113-1117.

Thomas H, Howarth CJ. 2000. Five ways to stay green. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 329-337.

Wang X, Chang J, Qin G, Zhang S, Cheng X, Li C. 2011. Analysis on yield components of elite maize variety Xundan 20 with super high yield potential. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 5490-5495.

Wu Y, Cosgrove DJ. 2000. Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1543-1553.

Related Articles

Protein profiling and antioxidant enzymatic activity of the ethanol extract of Cocculus hirsutus (L.) W. Theob. efficacy against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus

Marimuthu Malarvizhi, Jothi Dheivasikamani Abidharini, Arthi Boro, Murugesan Loganathan, Krishnaswamy Sujatha*, ArumugamVijaya Anand, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 222-241, February 2026.

Impact of organic and mineral fertilizers on the growth and biomass production of amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) in Burkina Faso

Sidnoma Marie Emeline Vanessa Sompougdou*, Hugues Roméo Bazié, Philippe Bayen, Caroline Bassono, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 210-221, February 2026.

Antimicrobial resistance profiling and molecular characterization of a multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from poultry environments in Bangladesh

Rashna Islam, Rubaya, Jahangir Alam, Anjuman Ara Bhuyan, Md. Abdul Alim, M. M. Kamal Hossain, Mir Rowshan Akter, Md. Sagir Ahmed, Shohel Mahmud*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 201-209, February 2026.

Lived experiences, psychosocial challenges and quality of life of drug surrenders

Van Ryan I. Alipoyo*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 184-200, February 2026.

Evaluation of the sensorial quality of peppermint (Mentha piperita) ice cream

Iriz Klir Austria, Michael Sta. Ana, Marigen E. Toraja*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 177-183, February 2026.

Epidemiology of polycystic ovary syndrome among young adult women: A cross sectional analysis

Ch. B. Praveena Devi*, S. Priya, P. Tanvi, S. Swathika, G. Bhavitha Sri, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 170-176, February 2026.

Comparative assessment of mixed and intercropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Md. Shamim Ahmed*, Mohammad Tojammel Haq, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 151-158, February 2026.