Influence of pre-harvest bagging on fruit quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Mishribhog

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (295) Download (10)

Influence of pre-harvest bagging on fruit quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Mishribhog

M.T. Islam, M.S. Rahman, M. Shamsuzzoha, A.K.M.M.B. Chowdhury, R. Alom
Int. J. Biosci.11( 3), 59-68, September 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]


Bagging of mango fruits prior to harvest is the preeminent alternative to avoid adverse effect by causing physical damage and improve the commercial value of the fruit, namely, improving fruit coloration, reducing splitting mechanical damage, sunburn of the skin etc. An investigation was performed during the year 2016 from March to June for safe mango production by applying minimum use of pesticide entitled influence of bagging on physico-chemical properties and shelf life of mango cv. Mishribhog. The mango fruits were bagged at marble stage with different types of bags which constituted the various treatments viz.: T1: Brown paper bag; T2: White paper bag; T3: Polythene bag T4: Muslin cloth bag; T5: No bagging (control). Bagging with brown paper bag and white paper bag improved fruit retention, weight of fruit, diameter of fruit, pulp weight, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, percent of citric acid, reducing sugars and β-carotene at harvest and ripe stage over control. Brown paper bag changed fruit color. In all cases good quality, cleaner, disease and insect free fruits were harvested. The sensory qualities in fruits of brown, white and muslin cloth bags were improved over control. Fruit retention was significantly enhanced by pre-harvest bagging with brown paper bag (91.00%) and white paper bag (87.00%) over control (81.33%). The harvesting time was significantly deferred (65.67 days) in brown paper bag over control. Pre-harvest bagging also reduced occurrence of spongy tissue and the incidence of mealy bugs. These results specify that fruit bagging can improve fruit quality through diminution in disease and insect-pest infestation and shelf life of mango cv. Mishribhog.


Amerine MA, Pangborn RM, Rocssler EB. 1965. Principles of sensory evaluation of food.London: Academic Press.

AOAC 17th edition. 2000. Official method 920. 183 (b) sugars (reducing sugar) in Honey/ I. S. I. Hand book of Food Analysis (part 2). 36 P.

AOAC. 2004 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (12thEd.) Washington, D. C.

Awad MA. 2007. Increasing the rate of ripening of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Helali by preharvest and postharvest treatments. Postharvest Biollogy and Technology 43, 121-127.

BBS. 2016. Year book of agricultural statistics-2015. Bangladesh Bureau of statistics,Statistics Division, Ministry of planning, Government of the people’s Republic of Bangladesh.pp. 200.

Chonhenchob V, Kamhangwong D, Kruenate J, Khongrat K, Tangchantra N, Wichai U, Singh SP. 2011. Pre-harvest bagging with wavelength-selective materials enhances development and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. namdokmai #4. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 664-671.

Haldankar  PM, Parulekar YR, Alwala K, Kad MS, Shinde SM, Lawande KE. 2015. Studies on influence of bagging of fruits at marble stage on quality of mango cv. alphonso. Journal of Plant Studies 4, 12-20.

Haq IU,Rab A. 2012. Characterization of physico-chemical attributes of litchi fruit and its relation with fruit skin cracking. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 22, 142-147.

Harhash MM, Al-Obeed RS. 2010. Effect of bunch bagging color on yield and fruit quality of date palm. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 7, 312-319.

Hiratsuka S, Yokoyama Y, Nishimura H, Miyazaki T, Nada K. 2012. Fruit photosynthesis and phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase activity as affected by lightproof fruit bagging in Satsuma mandarin. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science137, 215–220.

Hofman PJ, Smith LG, Joyce DC, Johnson GL, Meiburg GF. 1997. Bagging of mango (Mangifera indicacv. ‘Keitt’) fruit influencesfruit quality and mineral composition. Postharest Biology and Technology 12, 83-91.

Hongxia  W, Wang SB, Shi SY, Ma WH, Zhou YG, Zhan RL. 2009. Effects of bagging on fruit quality in Zill mango. Journal of Fruit Science 26, 644-648.

Jakhar MS, Pathak S. 2016. Effect of pre-harvest nutrients application and bagging on quality and shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits cv. amrapali. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 18, 717-729.

Joshi GD, Roy SK. 1988. Influence of maturity, transport and cold storage on biochemical composition of Alphonso mango fruit. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 13(1), 1215.

McHenry EW, Graham M. 2013-2019.Observation on the estimation of ascorbic acid by filtration. Biochemistry Journal 1935, 29(9).

Moffett Jr. TM, Pater DrE. 2007. Determination of Citric Acid in Fruit Juice. SUNY Plattsburgh.

Moustafa AA. 2007. Effect of bagging period of spathes after pollination on fruit set, yield and fruit quality of “Seewy” dates under Fayoum Governorate conditions. Proceedings of the forth symposium on the date palm in Saudi Arabia, Al-Hassa.123.

Nagaharshitha D, Khopkar RR, Haldankar PM, Haldavanekar PC, Parulekar YR. 2014. Effect of bagging on chemical properties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. alphonso. Agrotechnology 3, 124.

Nagata M, Yamashita I. 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Journal of the Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 39, 925-928.

Om P. 2004. Diseases and disorders of Mango. In diseases of fruits and vegetable, diagnose and management. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1, p. 596.

Santini A, Romano R, Meca G, Raiola A. 2014. Antioxidant activity and quality of apple juices and puree after in vitro digestion. Journal of Food Research 3, 1-50.

Sharma RR, Pal RK, Asrey R, Sagar VR, Dhiman MR, Rana MR. 2013. Pre-harvest fruit bagging influences fruit color and quality of apple cv. Delicious. Agricultural Science 4(9), 443-448.

Sharma RR, Reddy SVR, Jhalegar MJ. 2014. Preharvest fruit bagging a review. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 89, 101-113.

Sharma RR, Singh D, Singh R. 2009. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists. Biological Control 50, 205-221.

Sharma RR. 2009. Fruit Production: Problems and Solutions. International Book Distributing Company, Lucknow, India. pp 649.

Singh H. 1996. Mango. ICAR. New Delhi, India.

Singh BP, Singh RA, Singh G, Killadi B. 2007. Response of bagging on maturity, ripening and storage behaviour of winter guava. Acta Horticulturae 735, 597–601.

Uddin MS, Islam MS, Uddin MZ, Alam MA, Hossain MM, Rashid MH. 2015. Modern production technology of mango and its Marketing system. Regional Horticulture Research Station, BARI, Chapainawabganj 46 P.

Wang G, Xia R, Zeng X, Hu L. 2006. Effects of bagging on pigment, sugar and endogenous hormone contents of Cara Cara orange flesh. Journal of Applied Ecology 17, 256–260.

Watanawan A, Watanawan C, Jarunate J. 2008. Bagging ‘Nam Dok Mai’ mango during development affects color and fruit quality. Acta Horticulturae 787, 325-330.

Xu HX, Chen JW, Xie M. 2010. Effect of different light transmittance paper bags on fruit quality and anti-oxidant capacity in loquat. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 90, 1783-1788.

Yang WH, Zhu XC, Bu JH, Hu GB, Wang HC, Huang XM. 2009, Effects of bagging on fruitdevelopment and quality in cross-winter off-season longan. Scientia Horticulturae 120, 194-200.

Zhao JJ, Wang JB, Zhang XC, Li HL,Gao ZY. 2013. Effect of bagging on the composition of carbohydrate, organic acid and carotenoid contents in mango fruit. Acta Horticulturae 992, 537-554.

Zhou J, Zhong G, Lin Z, Xu H. 2012. The effects of bagging on fresh fruit quality of Canarium album. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 10(1), 505-508.

Zhou XB, Guo XW. 2005. Effects of bagging on the fruit sugar metabolism and invertase activities in ‘Red Globe’ grape during fruit development. Journal of Fruit Science 26, 30–33.