Influence of yeast application and fermentation duration on the physicochemical properties and bacterial community of Coffea arabica var. Bourbon

Paper Details

Research Paper 05/04/2025
Views (419)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Influence of yeast application and fermentation duration on the physicochemical properties and bacterial community of Coffea arabica var. Bourbon

Jr. Romeo P. Depositario, Romil J. Tan, Andrew B. Melencion, Guia P. Saludares
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(4), 11-19, April 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of yeast application with fermentation durations on physicochemical properties such as total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and potential hydrogen (pH), and microbial colony-forming units (CFU/g) of bacteria in Arabica coffee fermentation.  Yeast and fermentation duration produced a substantial combined effect on the properties of coffee. The sugar metabolism activities in yeast-fermented coffee reduced TSS, although TA levels increased and pH measurement decreased because of acid accumulation. The colony-forming unit (CFU/g) of bacteria varied significantly in all treatments, with yeast treatments increasing CFU/g after fermentation and gradual reduction after drying, while longer fermentation durations influenced the decrease of CFU/g but led to increased CFU/g after drying, particularly at 72 hours. The statistical analysis revealed highly significant results across all treatment combinations. This is how yeast fermentation under controlled conditions shapes sugar metabolism during the fermentation process, as well as affects acid production and microbial populations, which results in enhanced coffee quality properties.

Chen X, Zhao L. 2012. Role of yeast in fermentation: A review of acid production. Food Microbiology 29(4), 450–455.

Eerie Coffee Company. 2024. From bean to cup: Arabica coffee.  https://eeriecoffee.com/blogs/news/from-bean-to-cup-the-journey-of-brazilian-arabica-coffee (Accessed: 21 March 2025).

Johnson P, Brown M. 2013. Fermentation kinetics and the impact of time on pH dynamics. Food Chemistry 141(1), 50–56.

Lee Y, Kim H, Park S. 2011. Effects of fermentation duration on acid production in food fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology 145(2), 150–156.

PhilAtlas. 2024. Managa, Bansalan, Davao del Sur, Philippines. https://www.philatlas.com/mindanao/r11/davao-del-sur/bansalan/managa.html (Accessed: 21 March 2025).

Silva CF, Schwan RF, Dias ES, Wheals AE. 2013. Evaluation of a potential starter culture for enhancing coffee fermentation quality. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1175-2

Silva FL, Batista NN, de Souza CF. 2019. Changes in the chemical composition of coffee during yeast fermentation. Food Chemistry 278, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.064

Smith AB, Jones CD. 2010. Influence of fermentation parameters on pH and product quality. Journal of Food Science 75(3), R45–R50.

Sweet Maria’s Coffee Library. 2018. The coffee cherry basics. https://library.sweetmarias.com/the-coffee-cherry/ (Accessed: 21 March 2025).

Taillandier P, Lai QP, Julien-Ortiz A, Brandam C. 2014. Interactions between Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in wine fermentation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 30(7), 1959–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1605-5

Vilela DM, de Melo Pereira GV, Silva CF, Batista LR, Schwan RF. 2010. Molecular ecology and polyphasic characterization of microbiota in semi-dry processed coffee. Food Microbiology 27(8), 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.029

Visser W, Scheffers WA, Batenburg-van der Vegte WH, van Dijken JP. 1990. Oxygen requirements of yeasts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56(12), 3785–3792.https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.12.3785-3792.1990

Wang CJ, Zheng XQ, Nie Y, Zhang ZX, Zhang Y. 2020. Coffee flavor modification through controlled fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kluyveri. Food Research International 136, 109588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109588

Zhang X, Ni H, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zheng X. 2020. Impact of yeast fermentation on acidity and pH of coffee. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68(14), 3945–3952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b08039

Related Articles

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.

Enhancing growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) through fertilizer supplementation strategies

Catherine N. Payadon, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 83-98, May 2025.

Propagation techniques and organic fertilizer supplementation on growth and tuber yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius)

Frimalyn P. De Vera, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 66-82, May 2025.

Bio-efficacy of different neem formulations against onion armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)

Roan Joy P. Tubera, Artemio A. Martin, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 55-65, May 2025.