Interspecific competition, growth and productivity of maize and pea in intercropping mixture

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2013
Views (644)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Interspecific competition, growth and productivity of maize and pea in intercropping mixture

Prabir Chandra Dhar, Md. Abdul Awal, Md. Satu Sultan, Md. Masud Rana
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 3(10), 5-12, October 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to study the interspecific competition, growth and productivity of maize and pea in intercropping mixture in the department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University from November 2009 to April 2010. In this intercrop association, maize was considered as main crop and pea as intercrop. The experiment comprised of four treatments namely, (i) sole maize, (ii) sole pea, (iii) single row intercropping mixture (1M:1P i.e. single row of maize followed by single row of pea), and (iv) double row intercropping mixture (1M:2P i.e., single row of maize followed by double rows of pea). Dry matter accumulation in cob/pod of each population plants was the maximum in sole cropped plants while that was found minimum in 1M: 2P intercropped plants especially for pea while 1M: 1P intercropped plants ranked intermediate. The 1M:2P combined maize and pea mixture produced maximum seed yield (7.82 t ha-1) which was about 10, 28 and 47% higher yield than the yield obtained from 1M:1P combined mixture stands (7.04 t ha-1), sole maize (5.65 t ha-1) and sole pea (4.15 t ha-1), respectively. The single and double row combined intercropping mixtures gave the highest land equivalent ratio (1.31 and 1.47) and area time equivalent ratio (1.33 and 1.25, respectively). In both 1M: 1P and 1M: 2P intercropping mixtures, maize population exhibited strongly higher competition over pea. The 1M: 1P and 1M: 2P intercropping mixtures generated 1.44 and 1.71-fold higher maize equivalent yield as compared to the yield obtained from maize alone.

Awal MA, Pramanik MHR, Hoque MA. 2007a. Compatibility analysis of mustard and soybean stands in intercrop association. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment 1 (2), 53-57.

Awal MA, Khan MAH. 2004. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for green fodder yield and related traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh Journal of Crop Science 13-15, 1–5.

Awal MA, Koshi H, Ikeda T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 139(1-2), 74-83.

Awal MA, Pramanik MHR, Hossen MA. 2007b. Interspecies competition, growth and yield in barley-peanut intercropping. Asian Journal of Plant Science 6(4), 577-584.

Bhuiya SU, Islam MM, Uddin RM, Salam AM, Rahman M M. 2005. Introductory Agronomy. Oracle publications 38/2A, Banglabazar Mannan Market (2nd Floor), Dhaka-1100.

Dhingra KK, Dhillon MS, Grewal, DS, Sharma K. 1991. Performance of maize and mungbean intercropping in different planting and row orientation. Indian Journal of Agronomy 36 (2), 207-212.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Producers for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. International Rice Research Institute, John Willy and Sons. New York, PP. 139-240.

Hashem A, Moniruzzaman AFM. 1986. Effect of intercropping maize with cowpea at varying plant population. Bangladesh Journal of Agronomy 1(1), 25-35.

Hoque MA. 2007. Growth and yield of mustard and soybean in their intercrop association. MS Thesis. Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, PP. 24-38.

Martin JH, Leonard WH, Stamp DL. 1976. Principles of Field Crop Production. 3rd– ed., McMillan Pub. Co. Inc., New York.

Ofori F, Stern WR. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 41-90.

Rahman MM, Awal MA, Amin A, Parvej MR. 2009. Compatibility, growth and production potentials of mustard/lentil intercrops. International Journal of Botany 5 (1), 100-106.

Rana MM, Bhuiya MSU, Akhand MIM. 2013. Effect of intercropping of sesbania rostrata with transplant aman rice on yield and profitability. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2(1), 10-14.

Russell DF. 1986. MSTAT-C Package Programme. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State Univ., U.S.A.

Singh SP. 1983.    Intercrop sorghum with legumes. Indian Farm 33(6), 15- 22.

Singh V, Kothari SK, Tripathi HN. 1986. Studies on intercropping in sugarcane in central Uttar Pradesh. Indian Sugarcane Journal 35, 559-562.

Uddin BKM. 2008. Growth and productivity of wheat and peanut in intercrop association. M.S. Thesis. Department of Crop Botany, BAU, Mymensingh.

Watson DT. 1958. The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Annals of Botany 22, 37-54.

Related Articles

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.