Investigation of polyethylene glycol on some elements and proline of monogrem genotypes leaf of sugar beet in greenhouse conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2014
Views (634)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Investigation of polyethylene glycol on some elements and proline of monogrem genotypes leaf of sugar beet in greenhouse conditions

Lida Issazadeh, Reza Serajamani, Mojtaba Ghasemi Fahim, Bahram Mirzamasoumzadeh
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(1), 228-232, January 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Drought stress was one of the major problems to produce farms plants in Iran and the world, as well as a serious threat to the successful production of crops around the world. In other hand, drought stress was main factor to decrease sugar beet performance. According to this issue, an examination was done on 2011 at greenhouse in order to Investigate Polyethylene Glycol on some elements and proline of monogerm genotypes leaf of sugar beet. Examination was done in two-factor factorial frame in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In Factor a (drought level: 1 normal irrigation, 2: Polyethylene glycol 6000 with 30% concentration) and factor b (genotype) was performed. In this study, sodium, potassium, phosphorus and leaf proline were evaluated. The results showed that there was significant difference at 1% probable level between interaction of × genotype in term of sodium, potassium and phosphorus characteristics and there was no significant difference at proline leaf genotypes at 1% probable level. Polyethylene glycol caused to reduce 3.84 % sodium, 42.99 % potassium as well as caused to increase 40.68 % proline and 54.47 % phosphorus. Sodium and potassium among elements had 30908 and phosphorus had 30906 values. . Comparing effects mean sodium, potassium and phosphorus showed that highest values was respectively (normal × genotype 30,906), (normal × genotype 30,906) and (PEG 6000 × genotype 30906) combinations.

Al Bahrany M. 2002.Hand book of seed physiology, Food Product press, NewYork. p. 270.

Clover G, Smith H, Jaggard K. 1998.The crop under stress. British Sugar Beet Review 66(3), 17-19.

Firouzabadi Brothers M, Shamei S, Naimi Gh. 2003. Effect of different levels of water stress on improving the quality and quantity of three sugar beet lines. Journal of Sugar Beet (2) 19, 133-143.

Hosseini S, Pourebrahim H. 2006. Economic Evaluation of Agricultural Research in Iran: Sugar Beet. Journal of Agricultural Science (2), 83-75. Iran.

Kafi M, MahdaviDamghani A. 2002. Resistance mechanisms of plants to environmental stresses (translation). University of Mashhad.

Michel BE, Kaufmann MR. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physioloy 51, 914-916.

Nasiri M, Seyed sharifi R. 2007. Effect of micronutrient application on drought resistance of sugar beet seed production. 10th Congress of Soil Science p. 123.

Ober E. 2001. The search for drought tolerance in sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review 69 (1), 40-43.

Tsveltkou M, Weele R. 2000. Effects of seed coating and osmotic priming on the germination of lettuce seeds. Journal of the American Society for Horticulture Science 112, 153-156.

Related Articles

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.

Extraction and characterization of distilled water from by-product of salt refinery processing

Analyn I. Diola*, Eric A. Cunanan, Irene A. De Vera, Christian Garret F. Aquino, Julie M. Agpaoa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 151-156, January 2026.

Vulnerability to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: The case of the Talusan, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines

Angelica M. Darunday*, Judy Ann H. Fernandez, Shekinah L. Ogoc, Norlika D. Moti, Larry C. Herbito, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 138-150, January 2026.

Socio-ecological dimensions of intertidal gleaning: The use of local ecological knowledge to identify commercially important gastropods in Iligan Bay, Philippines

Katrina Flores, Armi G. Torres, Wella T. Tatil, Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 126-137, January 2026.

Conservation assessment of the marine ornamental fish species Pomacanthus imperator (Emperor angelfish) in the Philippines

Timothy Jan L. Adel*, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 114-125, January 2026.

Land use conflicts: An impediment to improved agrifood value chain management as perceived by crop farmers in southeast Nigeria

J. U. Chikaire, C. C. Ejiogu, H. I. Duruanyim, T. O. Ogbuji, S. I. Ogbaa, A. O. Kalu, J. I. Ukpabi, A. Rufai, L. C. Izunobi, J. U. Okwudili, C. I. Anah, E. U. Omeire, I. O. Okeoma, J. Nnametu, U. G. Chris-Ejiogu, I. E. Edom, C. N. Atoma, U. S. Awhareno, E. C. Mube-Williams, S. O. Adejoh, A. D. Ude, J. O. Oparaojiaku, C. O. Osuagwu, E. E. Ihem, B. N. Aririguzo, E. C. C. Amaechi, M. N. Osuji, C. A. Acholonu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 102-113, January 2026.