Irrigation levels influenced on morphophysiological characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2014
Views (277) Download (7)

Irrigation levels influenced on morphophysiological characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)

Md. Abdur Razzak, Md. Maniruzzaman Bahadur, Md. Hafizur Rahman Hafiz, Pronay Bala, Aynul haque , Anwar sadat, AK Azad
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.5( 4), 65-75, October 2014.
Certificate: IJAAR 2014 [Generate Certificate]


An experiment was conducted at the Research farm and laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology Department, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur during November 2012 to April 2013 to evaluate Morpho-physiological attributes, of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties affected by irrigations levels. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. Four irrigation levels {I0-No irrigation (control), I1-30 mm irrigation one at pre-flowering stage, I2-30 mm irrigation one at pod formation stage and I3 (30+30=60 mm irrigation one at pre-flowering stage and one at pod formation stage } were considered as main plot treatment and three chickpea genotypes (Barichhola-6, Barichhola-7 and Barichhola-9) were considered as sub plot treatment. Experiment showed that most of the morpho-physiological characters such as plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, MRC, RLWC, chlorophyll content, number of total flower plant-1, number of effective flower plant-1 and distance from 1st pod to soil surface increased significantly due to application of irrigation. The above parameters were the maximum when the chickpea varieties were treated with I3 followed by I1 then I2 over the control. But proline content increased due to lake of irrigation and I0 produced the maximum proline content.


Bahadur MM. 2008. Physiological attributes and their relationship to yield of barley as affected by irrigation and sowing time. Ph D thesis, Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi, 80-235.

BARC (Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council). 2013. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide. Published by BARC, Framgate, Dhaka, 56.

Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. 1962. A re-examination of relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological. Sciences. 15, 413-428.

BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 2010. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bur. Stat. Ministry of Planning. Govt. of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Dhaka, 130.

Bicer BT, Kalender AN, Akar DA. 2004. The effect of irrigation on spring-sown chickpea. Journal of Agronomy & Asian Network of Science Information 3, 154-158.

Delauney AJ, Verma DPS. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant Journal 4, 215-223.

Errabii T, Gandonou C B, Essalmani H, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Skali- Senhaji N. 2006. Growth, Proline and ion accumulation in Sugarcane callus cultures under drought-induced osmotic stress and its subsequent relief. African Journal of Biotechnology 5(6), 1488-1493.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition. John Willey and Sons, New York, 207-215.

Hafiz MR. 2007. Response of barley to sowing date and irrigation frequency. M.Sc. (Ag.) thesis, Dept Crop Botany, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Sci. and Tech. Univ. Dinajpur.

Hsiao T, Acevedo E. 1974. Plant response of water deficit, water use efficiency and drought resistance. Agricultural Meteorology 14, 59-84.

Hsiao TC.  1973.  Plant  responses  to  water  stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 519-570.

Hulse JH. 1991. Nature, composition and utilization of grain legumes. pp. 11-27. In: Uses of tropical Legumes: Proceedings of a Consultants’ Meeting, 27-30 March 1989, ICRISAT Center. ICRISAT, Patancheru, A. P. 502324, India.

Kramer PJ. 1982. Effect of water and plant productivity on yield. In: Handbook of Agric. productivity. Vol. 1 (ed). M. Rechcigl. C. R. C. Press. Florida, USA, 21-47.

Malhotra RS, Singh KB, Saxena MC. 1997. Effect of irrigation on winter-sown chickpea in a mediterranean environment. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 178, 297-243.

Malhotra RS, Pundir RPS, Slinkard AE. 1987. Genetic resources of chickpea. In: M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (ed.), The Chickpea. C.A.B. International Cambrian News Ltd, Aberystwyth, UK , 67-81.

Muehlbauer FJ, Singh KB. 1987. Genetics of chickpea. In: M.C.Saxena and K.B. Singh (eds.), The chickpea. CAB. International, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8DE, UK, 99-125.

Palled YB, Chandrashekharaiah AM, Adder G D. 1995. Response of Bengal gram to moisture stress. Indian Journal of Agronomy 30, 104-106.

Pannu RK, Singh DP. 1993. Effect of irrigation on water use, water-use efficiency, growth and yield of mung bean. Field Crops Research 31, 87-100.

Patel CL, Padalia MR, Babarin NB. 1983. Growth and plant water relation in groundnut grown under different soil moisture stress. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 53(5), 340-345.

Shaikh MAQ, Ahmed ZU, Zaman KMS, Majid A, Begum S, Razzaque MA, Bhuiya AD. 1989. Genetical improvement of mungbean, chickpea, lentil, blackgram and grasspea, 101-115.

Shamsi K, Kobraee S, Haghparast R. 2010. Drought stress mitigation using supplemental irrigation in rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Kermanshah. Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(27), 4197-4203.

Siddique MRB, Hamid A, IslamM S. 1999. Drought stress effect on yield and yield attributes of wheat. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 24(4), 621-628.

Singh J, Patel AL. 1996. Water status, gaseous exchange, proline accumulation and yield of wheat un response to water stress. Annals of Biology Ludhiana 12(1), 26-28.

Troll W, Lindley J. 1995. A photometric method for determination of proline. Journal of Biological Chemistry 215, 655-660.

UNDP, FAO. 1988. Land Resources Appraisal of Bangladesh for Agricultural Development. Rep. 2. Agroecological Regions of Bangladesh. UN Dev. Prog. Food and Agric. Org. 212-221.

Witham FW, Blydes DF, Devlin RH. 1986. Exercises in Plant Physiology (2nd addition). PWS publishers, Boton, U.S.P, 128-131.

Yancey PH. 1994. Compatible and counteracting solutes. In Cellular and Mol. Physiol. Cell Volume. Edited by Strange K. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 81-109.

Zlatev Z, Stoyanov Z. 2005. Effect of water stress on leaf water relations of young bean plants. Journal of Central European Agriculture 6(1), 5-14.