Land-use adjustment modeling with a modified oil refinery environmental impact assessment evaluation method supported by GIS
Paper Details
Land-use adjustment modeling with a modified oil refinery environmental impact assessment evaluation method supported by GIS
Abstract
The primary purpose of an oil refinery land use and its environmental risk is potential risks of an oil refinery project and its potential impacts on environmental parameters in order to establish Integrated Environmental Impact Assessment Method (IEIAM). Dynamic social and economic impact of different environmental factors on different spatial and temporal scales, the regional land use planning has become a complicated process. The purpose of this study was to develop a new model for development and regional planning of land use in large-scale modeling of the interaction between land use and demand in the small scale. Integrated assessment of land suitability in frame of production and compilation benchmark maps, including the ecological impacts, proximity effects, access and restrictions applying intelligent methods and multi-criteria decision making was modeling in Geographical Information System (GIS) system and requirements area to various utilization breakdowns on demand units by using regression analysis of existing data was determined. The developed IEIAM system by using current five years data of Tehran and Isfahan oil refineries were assessed in Isfahan and Isfahan provinces and the allocation to different applications in urban, rural, agriculture and industry in the years between 2008 till 2012 was performed. The results indicate that in regional land use plan modeling, consider to land appropriateness integrated assessment, land use demand, change rules of user demand simultaneously are essential in this method.
Erikstad L, Lindblom I, Jerpåsen G, Hanssen MA, Bekkby T, Stabbetorp O, Bakkestuen V. 2008. Environmental value assessment in a multidisciplinary EIA setting. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28, 131– 143.
Escofet A, Bravo-Pena. 2007. Overcoming environmental deterioration through defensive expenditures: Field evidence from Bahı´a del To´ bari (Sonora, Me´xico) and implications for coastal impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 84, 266–273.
Feldmann L. 1998. The European commission’s proposal for a strategic environmental assessment directive: expanding the scope of environmental impact assessment in Europe. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 3–14.
Fischer, TB. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 155– 170.
Garcia-Montero LG, Pastor IO, Quintana SM, Casermeiro MA. 2008. An environmental screening tool for assessment of land use plans covering large geographic areas. Journal of Environmental Science and Policy II. 285-293.
George C. 1999. Testing for sustainable development through environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19, 175–200.
Geraghty PJ. 1996. Environmental impact assessment practice in Ireland following the adoption of the European directive. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16, 189-211.
Gontier M, Balfors B, Mortberg U. 2006. Biodiversity in environmental assessment—current practice and tools for prediction. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 268– 286.
Haapio A, Viitaniemi P. 2008. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28, 469– 482.
Hanssen OJ. 1998. Environmental impacts of product systems in a life cycle perspective: a survey of five product types based on life cycle assessments studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 6, 299–311.
Hertwich EG, Pease WS, Koshland CP.1997. The Science of the Total Environment. The Science of the Total Environment 196, 13-19.
Hoepner T. 1999. A procedure for environmental impact assessments (EIA) for seawater desalinations plants. Journal of Desalination 124, 1-12.
Holm-Hansen J. 1997. Environmental impact assessment in Estonia and Norway, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 17, 449-463.
Huang YQ, Huang GH, Hu ZY, Maqsood I., & Chakma A., 2005. Development of an expert system for tackling the public’s perception to climate-change impacts on petroleum industry. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 29, 817–829.
Huijbregts MAJ, Struijs J, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Hendriks AJ, Meent D. 2005. Human population intake fractions and environmental fate factors of toxic pollutants in life cycle impact assessment. Journal of Chemosphere 61, 1495–1504.
Hunsberger CA, Gibson RB, Wismer SK. 2005. Citizen involvement in sustainability- centred environmental assessment follow-up. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 609– 627.
Ijäs A, Kuitunen MT, Jalava K. 2010. Developing the RIAM method (rapid impact assessment matrix) in the context of impact significance assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30, 82–89.
Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27, 287–300.
Joao E. 2002. How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22, 289–310.
Keen M, Sullivan M. 2005. Aiding the environment: the Australian Development Agency’s experience of implementing an environmental management system, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 628– 649.
Keysar E, Steinemann A, Keysar E, Steinemann A. 2002. Integrating environmental impact assessment with master planning: lessons from the US Army. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22, 583–609.
Khosravanie, Sh. 2001. A Guidance to Environmental Engineering in Oil Refinery. Nioc Publication.
Krieg E, Faber DR. 2004. Not so Black and White: environmental justice and cumulative impact assessments. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24, 667–694.
Kværner J, Swensen G, Erikstad L. 2006. Assessing environmental vulnerability in EIA-The content and context of the vulnerability concept in an alternative approach to standard EIA procedure. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 511–527.
Mohammad Rezaie Narimisa, Manouchehr Rezaie Narimisa (2014), Land-use adjustment modeling with a modified oil refinery environmental impact assessment evaluation method supported by GIS; JBES, V4, N5, May, P208-221
https://innspub.net/land-use-adjustment-modeling-with-a-modified-oil-refinery-environmental-impact-assessment-evaluation-method-supported-by-gis/
Copyright © 2014
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0