Modeling dam-break flows using a 3D Mike 3 Flow Model

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2014
Views (380) Download (11)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Modeling dam-break flows using a 3D Mike 3 Flow Model

Mohammad Zarein, Vahid Naderkhanloo
J. Bio. Env. Sci.5( 6), 1-6, December 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Dam-break flows usually propagate along rivers and floodplains. However, the majority of existing three-dimensional (3D) models used to simulate dam-break flows are only applicable to fixed beds. In this model, the common 3D shallow water equations are modified, so that the bed evolution on the flood wave propagation can be considered. These equations are based on the numerical solution of the three-dimensional incompressible Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations invoking the assumptions of Boussinesq and of hydrostatic pressure. Thus, the model consists of continuity, momentum, temperature, salinity and density equations and it is closed by turbulent closure scheme. For this 3D model the free surface is taken into account using a sigma-coordinate transformation approach. The model employs an unstructured finite volume algorithm. A predictor–corrector scheme is used in time stepping, leading to a second-order accurate solution in both time and space. The model was verified against results from existing numerical models and laboratory experiments at the same time it was used to simulate dam-break flows over a fixed bed in the predicted flood wave speed and depth. The results indicate that there is a good correlation between the dam-break flow predictions made over a fixed bed and existing numerical models and laboratory experiments.

VIEWS 22

Alcrudo F, GarciaNavarro P. 1993. A high-resolution Godunov-type scheme in finite volumes for the 2D shallow-water equations. International Journal of Numerical Methods Fluids 16, 489–505. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650160604

Chanson H. 2005. Analytical solution of dam break wave with flow resistance: application to tsunami surges. Proceedings of the 31 IAHR biennial congress, Seoul, Korea. p. 3341–53.

Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI). 2008. MIKE 21/MIKE 3 flow model FM: Hydrodynamic and transport module scientific documentation, DHI, Horsholm, Denmark.

Gallegos HA, Schubert JE, Sanders BF. 2009. Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: a case study of Baldwin Hills, California. Advances in Water Resources 32, 1323–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.008

Glaister P. 1988. Approximate Riemann solutions of the shallow water equations. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 26(3), 293–306.

Lin GF, Lai JS, Guo WD. 2003. Finite-volume component-wise TVD schemes for 2D shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources 26, 861–873.

Roe PL. 1981. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference-schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 43, 357-372.

Smagorinsky j. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review 91, 99–164. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091 <0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2.

Stoker JJ. 1957. Water waves. Pure and applied mathematics, vol. 4. New York, Interscience Publishers.

Xia J, Lin B, Falconer RA, Wang G. 2010. Modeling dam-break flows over mobile beds using a 2D coupled approach. Advances in Water Resources 33, 171–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.11.004

Xie JH. 1990 . River modeling. Beijing: China Water and Power Press. (in Chinese).

Zech Y, Soares-Frazão S, Spinewine B. 2008. Dam-break induced sediment movement: experimental approaches and numerical modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Research 46(2),176–90.

Zhang RJ, Xie JH. 1993. Sedimentation research in China. Beijing: China Water and Power Press.

Zhao DH, Shen HW, Lai JS, Tabios GQ. 1996. Approximate Riemann solvers in FVM for 2D hydraulic shock wave modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 122(12), 692–702.

Zhou JG, Causon DM, Mingham CG, Ingram DM. 2004. Numerical prediction of dam-break flows in general geometries with complex bed topography. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130(4), 332–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:4(332)