Morpho-agronomic characteristics and yield of new promising Soybean (Glycine max L.) Lines for Bacnotan, La Union, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 08/03/2024
Views (1152)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Morpho-agronomic characteristics and yield of new promising Soybean (Glycine max L.) Lines for Bacnotan, La Union, Philippines

Kevin E. Elias, Florentino Orpilla
Int. J. Biosci. 24(3), 133-140, March 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Over the past years, the Philippines has been importing soybeans to meet its domestic requirements. The importation is triggered by the very low production of local soybean farmers.  One of the constraints is the low-quality planting materials used by farmers. Hence, the performance of six new soybean lines (IBP Sy 2005-05-179, IBP Sy 2008-04-03A, IBP Sy 2008-05-177A, ICGV 02227, LG Sy 9956, and LG Sy 63) was evaluated. Results revealed that IBP Sy 2008-05-177A had the highest survival rate (57.31%), 100-seed weight (14.75 g), and seed yield per hectare (1.98 t ha-1) with advantages of 11.87%, 4.00g, and 0.41t ha-1 over the check variety, NSIC Sy 9, respectively. However, statistically insignificant differences were noted on plant height, pods per plant, length of pod and seeds per pod, and seed quality. The result showed that IBP Sy 2008-05-177A is a new promising soybean line for farmers in Bacnotan, La Union, Philippines.

Asif M, Acharya M. 2013. Phytochemicals and nutritional health benefits of soy plant. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis. 3(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0738.106998

De Avila AMH, Boucas Farias JR, Silveira H, Gustavo F. 2013. Climatic Restrictions for Maximizing Soybean Yields. In: A Compr Surv Int Soybean Res-Genet Physiol Agron Nitrogen Relationships. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/52177

Barrett JR. 2006. The Science of Soy: What Do We Really Know. Environ Health Perspect. 114(6). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-a352

Boyer JS. 1982. Plant Productivity and Environment. Science 218(4571), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443

Business World. 2019. Soybean R&D program hoping to boost yields. https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2019/01/28/210988/soybean-rd-program-hoping-to-boost-yields/

Business World. 2020. Soybean industry targeted for improved production, logistics-DoST. https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2020/01/13/272880/soybean-industry-targeted-for-improved-production-logistics-dost/#:~:text=The Philippines currently imports almost,1%25 is locally-produced.

Corpuz P. 2019. Philippines Oilseeds and Products Annual Philippine Oilseeds and Products Situation and Outlook. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Oilseeds and Products Annual_Manila_Philippines_3-20-2019.pdf

Dei HK. 2011. Soybean as a Feed Ingredient for Livestock and Poultry. In: Recent Trends Enhancing Divers Qual Soybean Prod. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/17601

Fehily AM. 2003. Soy (Soya) Beans | Dietary Importance. In: Encycl Food Sci Nutr. Elsevier; p. 5392–5398. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/01112-3

Filipenco D. 2023. Five largest soybean-producing countries. An in-depth look. https://www.developmentaid.org/news-stream/post/165992/top-5-soybean-producing-countries

Habib-ur-Rahman M, Ahmad A, Raza A, Hasnain MU, Alharby HF, Alzahrani YM, Bamagoos AA, Hakeem KR, Ahmad S, Nasim W. 2022. Impact of climate change on agricultural production; Issues, challenges, and opportunities in Asia. Front Plant Sci. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.925548

Hammond EG, Murphy PA, Johnson LA. 2003. Soy (Soya) Beans: Properties and Analysis. In: Encycl Food Sci Nutr. Elsevier; p. 5389–5392. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/01111-1

Hoffman JR, Falvo MJ. 2004. Protein – Which is Best. J Sports Sci Med. 3(3), 118–30.

Kim I-S, Kim C-H, Yang W-S. 2021. Physiologically Active Molecules and Functional Properties of Soybeans in Human Health—A Current Perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 22(8), 4054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084054

Lee T, Tran A, Hansen J, Ash M. 2016. Major Factors Affecting Global Soybean and Products Trade Projections. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/may/major-factors-affecting-global-soybean-and-products-trade-projections/

Liestianty D, Abdullah M. 2014. Phytoremediation study of Copper-Contaminated Soil Using Soybean (Glycine Max (L) Merril) with Compost Addition. http://www.ijias.issr-journals.org

Liu L, Knight JD, Lemke RL, Farrell RE. 2019. A side-by-side comparison of biological nitrogen fixation and yield of four legume crops. Plant Soil 442(1–2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04167-x

Maleki A, AF, Naderi A, Naseri R, Bahamin S, Maleki R. 2013. Physiological Performance of Soybean Cultivars under Drought Stress. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci. 2(6). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=feba682c3fd73c2c70e070efca4828ac79c5d4ba

Mihajlov L, Zajkova V, Balabanova B. 2015. Soybean phytoremediation of cadmium polluted agricultural soils. Yearb Fac Agric Goce Delcev Univ -Stip.

National Seed Industry Council. 2020. National Seed Industry Council – Registered Varieties C.Y. 2016-2020.

Nimje P. 2017. soybean production technology in Pakistan. Agriculture. http://www.agriculture.pk/production-technology-soybean/soybean-production-technology-in-pakistan6/

Our World In Data. 2023. Soybean yields, 2015 to 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/soybean-yields?tab=chart&time=2015..latest&country=MYS~AUS~BRA~CHN~PHL~IDN~THA~TWN~USA~IND~PRY~ARG~OWID_WRL

Philippine Statistics Authority. 2022. 2022 Selected Statistics on Agriculture and Fisheries. https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/%28ons-cleared%29_SSAF 2022 as of 30082022_ONS-signed.pdf

Procházka P, Štranc P, Vostřel J, Řehoř J, Brinar J, Křováček J, Pazderů K. 2019. The influence of effective soybean seed treatment on root biomass formation and seed production. Plant, Soil Environ. 65(12), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.17221/545/2019-PSE

Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood S, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, Xu J. 2019. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants 8(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8020034

Ritchie H, Roser M. 2021. Soy. https://ourworldindata.org/soy

Rizzo G, Baroni L. 2018. Soy, Soy Foods and Their Role in Vegetarian Diets. Nutrients 10(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10010043

Schlenker W, Roberts MJ. 2009. Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106(37):15594–15598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906865106

Sedibe M, M. Mofokeng A, R. Masvodza D. 2023. Soybean Production, Constraints, and Future Prospects in Poorer Countries: A Review. In: Prod Util Legum – Prog Prospect. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109516

Shea Z, M. Singer W, Zhang B. 2020. Soybean Production, Versatility, and Improvement. In: Legum Crop. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91778

Shurtleff W, Aoyagi A. 2017. History of Industrial Uses of Soybeans (Nonfood, Nonfeed) (660 CE-2017). https://www.soyinfocenter.com/books/207

Specialty Soya and Grains Alliance. 2020. Technically Speaking: Philippines a growing market. https://soyagrainsalliance.org/2020/06/05/technically-speaking-philippines-a-growing-market

Sudarić A. 2020. Introductory Chapter: Soybean- Quality and Utilization. In: Soybean Hum Consum Anim Feed. Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93942

The Observatory of Economic Complexity n.d. Soybeans in Philippines. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/soybeans/reporter/phl

Related Articles

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.