Morphological characterization of four peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under Lal-lo, Cagayan condition: Its phenotypic changes to type II climate of the Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2019
Views (718)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Morphological characterization of four peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under Lal-lo, Cagayan condition: Its phenotypic changes to type II climate of the Philippines

Angelina T. Gonzales, Marissa Isnec
Int. J. Biosci. 14(6), 397-404, June 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was conducted to characterize the four peanut varieties during wet season with type II climatic condition in terms of its morphological characteristics. The treatments used were: T1 – Luna Seeded, T2 – BPIPn9, T3 – NSICPn11, T4 – NSICPn17. These were randomly allocated in the different plots following the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The results of the study are: (1) erect growth habit, stem pigmentation, glabrous type of hairiness, alternate types of branching pattern, opposite leaf arrangement, yellow-orange flower color in all varieties were noticed; (2) leaflet shape: luna Seeded and NSIC11 exhibited elliptic while BPI Pn9 and NSIC17 exhibited lanceolate; (3) leaf color: luna Seeded and NSIC17 exhibited a dark-green while BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 11 exhibited light-green (3) pod Beak.: Luna Seeded and BPI Pn 9 exhibited prominent types, however, NSIC 11 and NSIC 17 has slight type; (3) pod constriction: Luna Seeded, BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 17 exhibited prominent types, while NSIC 11 has a moderate type (4) pod reticulation: Luna Seeded, BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 11 gave prominent types, however, NSIC 17 has a slight type; and (5) primary seed color: pink were predominantly noticed in Luna Seeded, BPI Pn9 and NSIC17, while NSIC11 has a tan seed color. The four peanut varieties are suitable under type II climatic condition. However, it is important that genetic purity and viability of the germplasm is maintained as a separate activity of agricultural R & D agencies.

Basha SM. 1990. Protein as indicator of peanut seed maturity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38, 373-376.

FAO. 2002–04. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.  Website www.fao.org

German JB, Dillard CJ. 2004. Saturated Fats: What Dietary Intake? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 550-559.

Hoffmann JR, Falvo MJ. 2004. Protein—Which Is Best?. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2004, pp. 118-130.

ICRISAT. 1992. Descriptors for groundnut. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi- Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

Kossmann ZJ, Smith AM. 2010. “Starch: Its Metabolism, Evolution, and Biotechnological Modification in Plants,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol. 61, No.1, pp.209-234.

Kudama G. 2013. Economics of Groundnut Production in East Hararghe Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Science, Technology & Arts Research Journa l2, 135-139.

Nigam SN, Giri DY, Reddy AGS. 2004. Groundnut seed production manual. Patancheru 502324, AP, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. pp 28.

Rao NK, Bramel PJ. 2000. Manual of genebank operations and procedures. In: ICRISAT, Technical Manual no 6, pp 190.

Reddy LJ, Nigam SN, Subrahmanyam P, Reddy RGS. 1993. Registration of ICGV- 86590, peanut cultivar. Crop Science 33, 357-358

Schaafsma G. 2000. The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score. Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 130, No. 7. pp. 1865-1867.

Upadhyaya HD, Pundir R, Sube PS, Singh and Gowda, LL. 2005. Procedures and protocols to maintain purity and viability of peanut (groundnut) germplasm. In: Improving yield and economic viability of peanut production in Papua New Guinea and Australia. Proceedings of a workshop held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, October 18-19, 2005.

USDA, 2011. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 24.

Zaman MA, Tuhina-Khatun M, Ullah MZ, Moniruzzamn M, Alam KH. 2011. Genetic Variability and Path Analysis of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The Agriculturists 9, 29-36.

Related Articles

Medicinal plants sold in Daloa markets: Traditional knowledge and Public health issues

Kouakou Yao Bertin, Kouakou Assoman Serge Alain, Kouame Yao Anicet Gervais, Malan Djah François, Bakayoko Adama, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 200-210, August 2025.

Agronomic performance and profitability of coffee wildlings using different soil media mixtures

Maribel L. Fernandez, Ricardo B. Casauay, Ronel A. Collado, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 189-199, August 2025.

Implications of aberrant glycosylation on age-related disease progression

Tahmid Ahmad Patwary, Mukramur Rahman, Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 176-188, August 2025.

Design and development of solar powered water sprayer: A green technology innovation

Lorenzo V. Sugod, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 159-175, August 2025.

Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and social awareness regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection in the kyrgyz population in the post-pandemic period

Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Haider Ali, Yahya Nur Ahmed, Yavuz Gunduz, Hafsa Develi, Tilekeeva UM, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 151-158, August 2025.

Tumor suppressing ability of myrtenal in DMBA-induced rat mammary cancer: A biochemical and histopathological evaluation

Manoharan Pethanasamy, Shanmugam M. Sivasankaran, Saravanan Surya, Raju Kowsalya, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 141-150, August 2025.

Assessing tree diversity in cashew plantations: Environmental and agronomic determinants in buffer zones of Mont Sangbé National Park, western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Serge Cherry Piba, Naomie Ouffoue, Sylvestre Gagbe, Alex Beda, Adama Tondossama, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 122-133, August 2025.