Morphological characterization of four peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under Lal-lo, Cagayan condition: Its phenotypic changes to type II climate of the Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2019
Views (364) Download (14)

Morphological characterization of four peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under Lal-lo, Cagayan condition: Its phenotypic changes to type II climate of the Philippines

Angelina T. Gonzales, Marissa Isnec
Int. J. Biosci.14( 6), 397-404, June 2019.
Certificate: IJB 2019 [Generate Certificate]


The study was conducted to characterize the four peanut varieties during wet season with type II climatic condition in terms of its morphological characteristics. The treatments used were: T1 – Luna Seeded, T2 – BPIPn9, T3 – NSICPn11, T4 – NSICPn17. These were randomly allocated in the different plots following the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The results of the study are: (1) erect growth habit, stem pigmentation, glabrous type of hairiness, alternate types of branching pattern, opposite leaf arrangement, yellow-orange flower color in all varieties were noticed; (2) leaflet shape: luna Seeded and NSIC11 exhibited elliptic while BPI Pn9 and NSIC17 exhibited lanceolate; (3) leaf color: luna Seeded and NSIC17 exhibited a dark-green while BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 11 exhibited light-green (3) pod Beak.: Luna Seeded and BPI Pn 9 exhibited prominent types, however, NSIC 11 and NSIC 17 has slight type; (3) pod constriction: Luna Seeded, BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 17 exhibited prominent types, while NSIC 11 has a moderate type (4) pod reticulation: Luna Seeded, BPI Pn 9 and NSIC 11 gave prominent types, however, NSIC 17 has a slight type; and (5) primary seed color: pink were predominantly noticed in Luna Seeded, BPI Pn9 and NSIC17, while NSIC11 has a tan seed color. The four peanut varieties are suitable under type II climatic condition. However, it is important that genetic purity and viability of the germplasm is maintained as a separate activity of agricultural R & D agencies.


Basha SM. 1990. Protein as indicator of peanut seed maturity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38, 373-376.

FAO. 2002–04. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.  Website

German JB, Dillard CJ. 2004. Saturated Fats: What Dietary Intake? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 550-559.

Hoffmann JR, Falvo MJ. 2004. Protein—Which Is Best?. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2004, pp. 118-130.

ICRISAT. 1992. Descriptors for groundnut. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi- Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

Kossmann ZJ, Smith AM. 2010. “Starch: Its Metabolism, Evolution, and Biotechnological Modification in Plants,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol. 61, No.1, pp.209-234.

Kudama G. 2013. Economics of Groundnut Production in East Hararghe Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Science, Technology & Arts Research Journa l2, 135-139.

Nigam SN, Giri DY, Reddy AGS. 2004. Groundnut seed production manual. Patancheru 502324, AP, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. pp 28.

Rao NK, Bramel PJ. 2000. Manual of genebank operations and procedures. In: ICRISAT, Technical Manual no 6, pp 190.

Reddy LJ, Nigam SN, Subrahmanyam P, Reddy RGS. 1993. Registration of ICGV- 86590, peanut cultivar. Crop Science 33, 357-358

Schaafsma G. 2000. The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score. Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 130, No. 7. pp. 1865-1867.

Upadhyaya HD, Pundir R, Sube PS, Singh and Gowda, LL. 2005. Procedures and protocols to maintain purity and viability of peanut (groundnut) germplasm. In: Improving yield and economic viability of peanut production in Papua New Guinea and Australia. Proceedings of a workshop held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, October 18-19, 2005.

USDA, 2011. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 24.

Zaman MA, Tuhina-Khatun M, Ullah MZ, Moniruzzamn M, Alam KH. 2011. Genetic Variability and Path Analysis of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The Agriculturists 9, 29-36.