Path analysis and correlation coefficient under the effect of different locations for bread wheat

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (509)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Path analysis and correlation coefficient under the effect of different locations for bread wheat

Riyadh Jabbar Al–Maliky
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 13(1), 78-83, July 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

To estimating some genetic parameters and the direct and indirect effects of the components of the bread wheat grain. A field experiment was carried out at three different location by planting nine cultivar of bread wheat in mid-Nov. 2015. The experiment was applied according to the RCBD design with three replicates. Direct, indirect and total effects were estimated based on the path analysis of the Reciprocation-model. The environmental, genetic and morphological correlation coefficients were estimated between the pairs of studied traits. Direct effect values were higher than indirect effects for all genetic parameters. Plant height showed the highest direct effected on grain yield variation (0.733) in Kut location at Wasit governorate, while the number of tillers recorded the highest direct effect (0.736) in Diwaniyah location at Diwaniyah governorate. The highest correlation environment coefficient (0.525, 0.531, and 0.470). The highest genetic correlation were 0.918, 0.802 and 0.856. The highest phenotypic correlation were 0.889, 0.797 and 0.781 for the three location.

Abd El-Mohsen AA, Amein MM. 2016. Comparing two statistical models for studying genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis in flax. Intl. J. Farm and Alli Sci 5(4), 278-289.

Agarwal V, Ahmad Z. 1982. Heritability and genetics advance in triticale. Indian J. Agric. Res 16, 19-23.

Anwar J, Ali M, Hussain M, Sabir W, Khan M, Zulkiffal M, Abdullah M. 2009. Assessment of yield criteria in bread wheat through correlation and path analysis. J. Animal and Plant Sci 19(4), 185-188.

Aycicek M, Yildirim T. 2006. Path coefficient analysis of yield and yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Pak. J. Bot 38(2), 417-424.

Bornhofen E, Benin G, Storck L, Marchioro VS, Meneguzzi C, Milioli AS, Trevizan DM. 2017. Environmental effect on genetic gains and its impact on bread-making quality traits in brazilian spring wheat. Chilean J. Agri. Res 77(11), 27-34.

Demisie D. 2016. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Yield Stability Analysis of Ethiopian Bread Wheat Using Mixed Model. Haramaya University, Haramaya pp. 78.

Haddad L, Bouzerzour H, Benmahammed A, Zerargui H, Hannachi A, Bachir A, Salmi M, Oulmi A, Fellahi ZE, Nouar H, Laala Z. 2016. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for grain yield in early and late sowing date on durum wheat (Triticum Durum Desf.) genotypes. Jordan J. Bio. Sci 9(3), 139 – 146.

Hanson CH, Roubuson HF, Comstock. 1956. Biometerical studies of yield in seger gating population of Kovean Lespedeza. Agron. J 48, 268-272.

Herrera LAC, Crossa J, Espino JH, Autrique E, Mondal S, Velu G, Vargas M, Braun HJ, Singh RP. 2017. Genetic yield gains in cimmyt’s international elite spring wheat yield trials by modeling the genotype environment interaction. Crop Sci 57, 789–801.

Kaya Y, Akcura M. 2014. Effects of genotype and environment on grain yield and quality traits in bread wheat (T. Aestivum L.). Food Sci. Technol, Campinas 34(2), 386-393.

Khazratkulova S, Sharma RC, Amanov A, Ziyadullaev Z, Amanov O, Alikulov S, Ziyaev Z, Muzafarova D. 2015. Genotype × environment interaction and stability of grain yield and selected quality traits in winter wheat in Central Asia. Turk J Agric. Forestry 39, 920-929.

Mohammadi A, Majidi E, Bihamta M, Sharifabad SH. 2007. Evaluation of drought stress on agro-morphological characteristics in some wheat cultivars. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 73, 184-192.

Mohammadi R, Farshadfar E, Amri A. 2016. Path analysis of genotype × environment interactions in rainfed durum wheat. Plant Prod. Sci 19(1), 43–50.

Subira J, Alvaro F, Luis F, Moral G, Royo G. 2015. Breeding effects on the cultivar × environment interaction of durum wheat yield. Europ. J. Agron 68, 78–88.

Walter AB. 1975. Manual of quantitative genetics. (3rd edition) Washington State Univ. Press. U.S.A. pp. 593.

Related Articles

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.

Enhancing growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) through fertilizer supplementation strategies

Catherine N. Payadon, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 83-98, May 2025.

Propagation techniques and organic fertilizer supplementation on growth and tuber yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius)

Frimalyn P. De Vera, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 66-82, May 2025.

Bio-efficacy of different neem formulations against onion armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)

Roan Joy P. Tubera, Artemio A. Martin, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 55-65, May 2025.