Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2016
Views (824)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Georgi Kikindonov
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 8(4), 81-86, April 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The majority of the commercial varieties of sugar beet in Europe are hybrids, based on monogerm diploid male-sterile females and multigerm diploid and tetraploid pollinators. The aim of the present study is by testing the basic biological qualities of recently created male-sterile sugar beet lines (male sterility, monogermity, seeds germination), and the combination of productivity and technological qualities, to make an assessment of their breeding value. The diploid lines have high male sterility, combined with high laboratory seeds germination and practically full monogermity. The tetraploid lines show significantly lower levels of male sterility and germination. The diploid monogerm lines MS 0819, MS 0922 and MS 0926 combine good biological characteristics with high own productivity and technological indices. The tetraploid lines tested have better technological qualities, and the best combination of good biological and economic qualities is manifested by MS 142. The high heterosis effect levels registered for the white sugar yield from the triploid hybrids of the tested lines with multigerm pollinators are indication for the very good combining ability of the monogerm lines and a proof for their high breeding value.

Akeson KR. 1980. Sugar beet fruit germination and emergence under moisture and temperature stress. Crop Science 20, 134-139. Antonov I. 1997. Basic trends in the breeding of n monogerm male sterile lines of sugar beet. Plant science 34 (7-8), 24-27.

Antonov I, Zakhariev A. 1994. State and problems of the sugar beet breeding in Bulgaria. Plant Science 31(3-4), 97-101.

Biancardi E, McGrath JM, Panella LW, Lewellen RT, Stevanato P. 2010. Sugar Beet. In: Bradshow JE (Ed.) Root and Tuber Crops. Handbook of Plant Breeding, New York, Springer 7, 173-219.

Bosemark NO. 2006. Genetics and Breeding In: Draycott AP. (Ed.) Sugar Beet, Oxford UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 50-88.

Jansen R, Stibbe C. 2007. Impact of plant breeding on the profitability of sugar beet production. International Sugar Journal 109, 227-233.

Kawakatsu M, Tanaka M. 1999. Investigation of Qualities of Sugar Beet Seed 5. Effects of multigerm pollen parent on the qualities of monogerm hybrid seed. Proceedings of Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 41, 103-109.

Kikindonov Tz, Kikindonov G, 2004. Individual selection of new male-sterile lines of sugar beet. Field Crops Studies 1 (2), 255-259.

Lidanski T. 1988. Statistical Methods in Biology and Agriculture. Zemizdat, Sofia 231-275.

Rostel HJ. 1981. Ergebnisse und problem der hybridzuchtung bei Zuckerruben unter beruck-sightigung der genomdosis. Ber.Acad.Wiss. DDR, Berlin 191, 79-84.

Steinrucken G. 2005. Prospects in sugar beet breeding. In: Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet, Einfield, Science Publishers Inc. 234.

Uchkunov I, Uchkunova K. 2012. Productivity of monogerm hybrids of sugar beet with the use of multigerm pollinators. Plant Science 49 (5), 29-32.

Uchkunova K. 2006. Use of multigerm pollinators with valuable combinative qualities in creation of monogerm sugar beet hybrids. Field Crops Studies 3 (1), 70-72.

Related Articles

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.