Quality and yield of snap bean lines locally developed in Kenya

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2013
Views (561)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Quality and yield of snap bean lines locally developed in Kenya

S.W. Wahome, P.M. Kimani, J.W. Muthomi, R.D. Narla
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 3(7), 1-10, July 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Snap bean varieties with high yields of extra fine and fine yield are preferred to avoid heavy postharvest losses and reduced consumer appeal. The objective of this study was to select snap bean populations and lines developed for multiple disease resistance for high pod quality and yield. Six groups of snap beans populations at different generations and 49 snap bean lines including local checks were evaluated for their yield performance at KARI-Thika and Mwea for two seasons. Data collected included duration to flowering and maturity, pod length and width, number of pods per plant, marketable pod yield and pod quality (extra fine, fine and bobby). There were significant differences among the genotypes with respect to days to flowering, days to maturity, pod length, pod diameter, marketable pod yield and pod quality. Climbing snap bean took the longest duration to flower and mature compared to bush snap beans. Snap bean populations and lines with higher number of pods per plant, pod length and pod diameter than the local checks were recorded. Climbing lines had a highest pod diameter of 11mm among the snap bean lines. HAB 423 had the highest pod yield of 15.1 t/ha while Star 2053 was the best yielding parent check with pod yield of 11.5 t/ha. Star 2053 had the highest proportion of extra fine pod yield (92.6%) while SB-08-3-2 population had the highest proportion (85.8%) among the populations and lines. Therefore, it is evident that locally develop snap bean varieties with multiple disease resistance and high yields of acceptable quality can be achieved.

HCDA (Horticultural Crops Development Authority) 2011. Export statistics for Horticultural Crops in 2011.

Ndegwa AM., Muchui MN., Wachuri SM. and Kimamira JN. 2009. Evaluation of introduced snap bean (Phaesolus vulgaris L.) varieties for adaptability and pod quality. KARI-CIAT report. 4 pages.

Wasonga JC., Pastor-Corrales MA., Timothy GP. and Philip D., Griffiths. 2010. Targeting Gene Combinations for broad-spectrum Rust Resistance in Heat-tolerant Snap Beans Developed for Tropical Environments. Journal of American Society of Horticulture Science. 135 (6): 521-532.

Ndegwa AM. and Muchui MN. 200. Introduction and Evaluation of Snap and Runner Beans. In Annual Report, KARI, Thika. pp. 43-46.

Monda EO., Munene S. and Ndegua A. 2003. French bean production constraints in Kenya. Africa Crop Science Conference Proceedings.Volume 6. 683-687.

Ndungu BW., Ndegwa AM., Muchui MN., Irambu EM., Kambo CM. and Gatambia EK. 2004. Baseline and Benchmark Report on Vegetable Production in Kirinyaga District of Kenya. 5p.

Van Schoonhoven A. and Pastor-Corrales MA. 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. Cali, Colombia. 54 p.

Emam Y., Shekoofa A., Salehi F. and Jalali AH. 2010. Water stress effects on two common bean with constrating growth habits. American-Eurasian Journal of agriculture and Enviromental Science Volume 9 (5), Pages 495-499.

Mohammed Yesuf and Somsiri Sangchote. 2007. Survival and transmission of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum from naturally infected common bean seeds to the seedlings. Tropical science 47 (2), 96-103.

Muchui MN., Ndegwa AM. and Njuguna LW. 2001. Postharvest Evaluation of Superior of Snap (French) Bean and Snow/Snap pea varieties. In Annual Report, KARI, Thika. pp. 111-112.

Arunga Esther, Henk A., Van Rheenen and Owuoche JO. 2010. Diallel analysis of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties for important traits, African Journal of Agricultural Research Volume 5 (15), Pages 1951-1957.

Jian Jin, Xiaobing Liu, Guanghua Wang, Liang Mi, ZhongbaoShen, Xueli Chen and Stephen J. Herber. 2010. Agronomic and physiologcal contributions to the yield improvement of soybean cultivars released from 1950 to 2006 in North east China. Field Crops Research. 115: 116-123.

Mohamed I. Dawo, Francis E. Sanders, David J. Pilbeam. 2007. Yield, yield components and plant architecture in the F3 generation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) derived from a cross between the determinate cultivar ‘Prelude’ and an indeterminate landrace. Euphytica 15(6): 77-87.

Related Articles

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.