Socio-economical effects of land consolidation in North of Iran (Case study: farms of Masal County)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2013
Views (741)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Socio-economical effects of land consolidation in North of Iran (Case study: farms of Masal County)

G. Moradi, A. R. Eslami, S. Firouzi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(2), 61-67, February 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

One of the important issues that come up in recent decades has been the fragmentation of agricultural land and frequency of plots. Fragmentation of plots and being small is one of the challenges and major obstacles in the way of increasing production and ultimately the development of agriculture. In recent years, agricultural production has not been commensurate with the growth of population. On the other hand, small size of agricultural units and their fragmentation had been created some limitations in agricultural production. Limitations such as to equip and prepare the production surface, infrastructure performance and utilization of machines, increasing the quantity and quality of products and increase the efficiency in various fields. Farmlands consolidation means integrating or coordinating all agricultural activities such as land preparation, seeds preparation, fertilizers, pesticides and farm machinery, maintenance and use them correctly, proper farm management and marketing of agricultural products, so that we can lead cultivation and crops type in accordance with the needs of the community while raising power of production. This study used a descriptive – analytical method to investigate the consolidation agricultural land plan in the Masal city and the results show that dispersion of plots and being small is one of the challenges and major obstacles in the way of increasing production and ultimately the development of agriculture. To determine the factors affecting the adoption of land consolidation by rice farmers, the logit regression model was used.

Agele S. 2011. Biotic and Abiotic Constraints to Revegetation and Establishment of Functional Ecosystem in Degraded Lands in a Tropical Environment. International Journal of Forest, Soil And Erosion (IJFSE), 1(1), 5-10.

Ahukaemere C, Ndukwu B, Agim L. 2012. Soil Quality and Soil Degradation as Influenced by Agricultural Land Use Types in the Humid Environment. International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion (IJFSE), 2(4), 175-179.

Backman M. (2001). Land Consolidation in Sweden,  Lecture  at  the  National  Land  Survey  in Helsinki.

Crecentea R , Alvareza C, Frab U. 2002. Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Land Consolidation in Galicia, Land Use Policy, 19(2), 135–147.

Ebrahimi MS, Kalantri Kh, Asadi A. 2012. Factor Analysis of Paddy-Field Consolidation: Case Study of Iran. Sustainable Agriculture Research; Vol. 1(2), 108-114.

Eftekhari  A,  Rokno-Aldin.  2006.  Agricultural Development (Concepts, Principles, Research Methods, Planning in the Agricultural Land Consolidation) SAMT Publication: Tehran. P.345.

Gajendra S Niroula, Gopal B Thapa. 2005. Impact and Causes of Land Fragmentation ,and Lessons Learned From Land Consolidation In South Asia, Land Use Policy, 22(4), 358–372.

Obrie AS. 1991. Migration, Urbanization and Development, Translation of Guidance culture, Institute of Labour and Social Security, First Publication, Tehran. p. 215.

Pietro O, Marson D. 1991. Different approaches in rural development, No.4, Research and Rural Issues, Ministry of Jihad, First Edition, Tehran.

Sarker RA, Quaddus MA. 2002. Modeling a Nationwide Crop Planning Problem Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Making Tool, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 42(2–4), 541–553.

Singh J, Dhillon SS. 1995. Agricultural Geography, Translated by: Siavosh Dehghanian et al., Mashhad, Publications Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. P. 288.

Todaro M. 1985. Economic Development in the Third World. Translated by Gholamali Farjadi, Ministry of Planning and Budget, Vol.1, First Publication, Tehran.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.