home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Sustainable Production of Banana, Musa acuminata × balbisiana Colla (ABB Group) cv ‘Cardaba’ through integrated crop management

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2016
Views (335) Download (20)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Sustainable Production of Banana, Musa acuminata × balbisiana Colla (ABB Group) cv ‘Cardaba’ through integrated crop management

Rowena P. Varela, Norman P. Gonzales
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.9( 2), 171-179, August 2016.
Certificate: IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Cardaba bananaIntegrated crop managementRaw material supplySustainable production

Abstract

Integrated crop management technology is a compilation of technologies for disease management and cultural practices for cardaba banana. To evaluate the fitness of the ICM technology to local conditions, on-site evaluation on the effectiveness and efficiency of the technology was conducted in banana-growing communities. The results reveal that most cardaba banana farmers do not adopt technologies for cultural management. They have no experience in fertilization, sucker removal, irrigation and drainage and the use of tissue-cultured planting materials. They, however, implemented basic practices such as weeding and deleafing. In the on-farm experiment, bananas in plots receiving ICM technology intervention have significant advantage over those under the Farmers’ Practice. In general, bananas with technology intervention are taller and sturdier with more functional leaves. The same trend was noted in the reproductive performance, which resulted to higher income. However, the cost-benefit ratio in the 1st year of production is not significantly different between the area with technology intervention and Farmers’ Practice. Sustaining the practice until 5 years when replanting is required can be more economically rewarding.

VIEWS 4
Cover PDF

Bathan BM, Lantican F A. 2010. Factors affecting yield performance of banana farms in Oriental Mindoro, Philippines. J. ISSAAS 16(1), 110-120.

Blomme G, Swennen R,  Tenkouano, A. 2005. Environmental influences on shoot and root growth in banana and plantain. In African Crop Science Conference Proceedings (Vol. 7, No. pt. 03 of 03, pp. 1163-1167).

De los Reyes JH, Pelupessy W. 2009. Agrarian reform in the Philippine banana chain. Antwerpen, Belgium IOB.

Faylon PS, Eusebio JE, Anit EA. 2003, “Banana R&D in the Philippines: Updates and highlights”, Advancing banana and plantain R&D in Asia and the Pacific. Vol 12, p. 81.

HVCDP. 2012. “High Value Crops Development Program”, Department of Agriculture. Available at http://hvcdp. da.gov.ph/saba.htm

Janoplo F. 2002. “Combating the banana bugtok effectively”, BAR Chronicle, Vol. 3 No. 9-10, pp 6-7.

Lantican FA. 2008. Philippine banana industry: market performance, constraints and policy directions. In SEARCA Professorial Chair Lecture, College, Laguna (Philippines) 26 May 2008.

Machado S. 2009. “Does intercropping have a role in modern agriculture?”, Journal of soil and water conservation 64(2), pp. 55-57.

Min DA. 2011. “Industry Brief: Banana 2011”. Mindanao Development Authority, Davao City, Philippines pp. 1-6.

Salau OR, Momoh M, Olaleye OA, Owoeye RS. 2016. Effects of Changes in Temperature, Rainfall and Relative Humidity on Banana Production in Ondo State, Nigeria. World Scientific News 44, 143.

Sequeira L. 1998. “Bacterial wilt: the missing element in international banana improvement programs”, in P Prior, C Allen, J Elphinstone (Eds), Bacterial Wilt Disease; Molecular and Ecological Aspects, INRA Editions, Paris pp. 6-14.

Soguilon CE, Magnaye LV, Natural MP. 1994. “Bugtok disease of cooking bananas: 1. Etiology and diagnostic symptoms”. Philippine Phytopathology 30, pp. 26-34.

Zhang F, Li L. 2003. “Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency”, Plant and soil 248(1-2), pp. 305-312.

Submit Manuscript