Taxonomic account of dung beetles from Gujrat, Punjab (Pakistan)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2015
Views (781)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Taxonomic account of dung beetles from Gujrat, Punjab (Pakistan)

Nadia Noureen, Mubashar Hussain, Muhammad Faheem Malik
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 7(3), 20-26, September 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was aimed to explore the diversity, distribution and description of dung beetle fauna in Gujrat, Pakistan in 2014 – 2015. Samples were collected from natural forests, grazing pastures and agricultural areas of district Gujrat during the study period by using appropriate sampling techniques.Total of 349 specimens were collected and identified by using standard keys. The recorded specimens were identified into 4 tribes, 7 genera and 16 species including Gymnopleurus bicallosus, Heliocopris bucephalus, Catharsius pithecius, Catharsius molessus, Catharsius sagax, Catharsius platypus, Catharsius granulatus, Onthophagus gazelle, Onitis philemon, Onitis subopacus, Onitis singhalensis, Onitis castaneous, Onitis excavatus, Tiniocellus spinipes and Oniticellus cinctus of subfamily Scarabaeidae and Aphodius crenatus of subfamily Aphodiinae. It was concluded that Gujrat is a diverse area for dung beetle fauna but there is a need to study the population dynamics of Scarabaeidae at a comprehensive level to evaluate its ecological role.

Andresen E, Levey D. 2004. Effects of dung and seed onsecondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologica 139, 45–54.

Andresen E. 1999. Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fateof dispersed seeds in a Peruvian rain forest. Biotrop 31, 145–158.

Andresen E. 2002a. Primary seed dispersal by red howler monkeys and the effect of defecation patterns on the fate of dispersedseeds. Biotrop 34, 261–272.

Andresen E. 2002b. Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rain forest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 257– 270.

Arrow GJ. 1931. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Col. Lamella III (Coprinae). Taylor and Francis, London, 428 p.

FAO. 2001. Crop production statistics. (Online) http://www.fao.org

Grimaldi D, Engel MS. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press. New York, 755 p.

Halffter G, Edmonds WD. 1982. The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae)- an ecological and evolutive approach, Instituto de Ecologia. Mexico DF, 1–176 p.

Halffter G, Matthews EG. 1966. The natural historyof dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Fol. Entomol. Mexi., 12(14), 1–312.

Hanski I, Cambefort Y. 1991. Dung Beetle Ecology. (eds. I. Hanski & Y. Cambefort). Princeton UniversityPress, New Jersey, 305–329 p.

Horgan FG. 2001. Burial of bovine dung by coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from horse and cow grazingsites in El Salvador. E J Soil Biol. 37, 103–111.

Jessop L. 1986. Dung Beetles and Chafers, Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidae. 5, Part II. Hand books for the identification of British insects. Royal Entomological Society of London, 53 p.

Miller JC. 1993. Insect natural history, multi-species interactions and biodiversity in ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv 2, 233–241.

Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada JNC, Larsen T, AmezquitaS, Favila ME. 2008. Ecological functions and ecosystemservices provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol. Conserv., 141:1461– 1474.

Siddiqui H, Ahmed Z, Khatri I. 2014. Distributional Notes and New Records for the Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Pakistan. Pak J Zool., 46 (2): 295–307.

Vaz-De-Mello FZ. 2000. Haciaun Proyecto CYTED parael inventario y estimaci´on de la diversid ad Entomol´ogicaenI beroam´erica: PrIBES-2000 (eds. F. Martin-Piera, J.J.

Related Articles

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.

Conservation and trade dynamics of non-timber forest products in local markets in south western Cameroon

Kato Samuel Namuene, Mojoko Fiona Mbella, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Eunice Waki, Hudjicarel Kiekeh, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 58-69, August 2025.

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.