The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2014
Views (468)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Kourosh Mojavery Samak, Reza Kakvan, Behnam Ghanami, Shaghayegh DelfanAzari
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(1), 638-646, July 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Environment effects evaluation can be used by planners and urban development managers as a tool for recognition survey and comparison of different urban development effects. the suitable effect evaluation method for this kind of development Ulrich includes a variety of activities is an Iranian Leopold matrix that measures each activitys effect on different environment components and gives it a number between -5 (very bad or destructive) and +5 (very good or useful). The most important negative effects of New Cities in construction level considering its location and environmental specification are changing the natural land shape changing the valleys morphology changing the natural hydrology system plant and animal settlement destruction and cutting the animal immigrative paths. In population habitancy level the most important effects on spate behaviours changing the animal food and immigration. The most important solution for reducing the mentioned problems in construction level are to obey the natural land shape prevention of extra land preparation minimum change in land preventing a long operation level and in population settlement level traffic management. Appropriated disposd sewerage network development keeping natural immigration paths making urban green spaces and a kind of jungle belt to restrict the illegal development.

Booth AG. 1984. Ecology and Planning; The Planning Components, In: Botequilha A. L. and Ahern Jack, 2002, Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Botequilha AL, Ahern Jack. 2002. Applying Landscape. Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Canter L. 1978. Environmental Impact. Assessment, McGraw Hill, New York

Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy , first edition, Island Press, Washington, in: Egger, S.,2006, Determining a Sustainable City Model, Environmental Modeling and Software 21,1235-1246.

Hardey Dennis.1991. From GardenCities to New Towns : Campaigning for Town and Country Planning 1899-1946 (Studies in History, Planning and the Environment), Published by Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0419155708, 9780419155706, 340 pages.

Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac, London: Oxford University Press.

Mc Harg Ian L. 1969. Design with Nature, American Museum of Natural History.

Nouri J, Malmasi S. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of urban development plan by vulnerability model application, International Journal of Environmental Science &Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-15.

Osborn F, Whittick A. 1979. New Towns, Their Origins, Achievements and Progress, in: Current Book Review Citations 26. Published by H.W. Wilson Co, 1981.

Rees W. 1996. Urban Ecological footprints: Why cities cannot besustainable and why they are a key to sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 223-248.

Schaffer Frank. 1970. The New Towns Story, London: Published by Mac Gibbon & Kee, 342 pages.

Related Articles

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.

Extreme rainfall variability and trends in the district of Ouedeme, municipality of Glazoue (Benin)

Koumassi Dègla Hervé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 1-9, September 2025.

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.