The economies of scale of catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2018
Views (622)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The economies of scale of catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan

Irma Febrianty, Emmy Sri Mahreda, Alim Bachri, Fatmawati
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(4), 101-108, October 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency has been widely practiced by fish-farmers from various scales of production, however, there was no study that shows comparison of which size is the most cost-effective. Therefore this study is needed to obtain the most cost-effective scale of production to start business with and in contrast to previous studies that only examined one economies of scale. The purpose of this study was to analyze the most cost-effective scale of production in catfish pond culture. The method used in this study is stratifying each scale of production in catfish pond culture. The data were collected by stratified random sampling. The investment criteria at each scale of production were used as the business feasibility analysis. The results showed that the large-scale production has the highest feasibility values (IRR 94,9), this was due to the amount of investments that was invested, and the good business management carried out by the owner based on his 25 years’ fish farming experience. The small-scale production (IRR 94,65) was ranked second in terms of feasibility compared to the medium-scale (IRR 93,9), this was because the small-scale production did not spend a lot of investment costs. In general, small-scale farmers do not incur investment costs for machinery and feed structures, and the ponds built by most respondents are soil-based ponds. The medium-scale production were spending more investment costs for the ponds construction, machinery and feed structures. In conclusion, based on their level of feasibility, the most cost-effective scale of production can be sorted as large, small and medium-scale production.

Andrew J, Hooker S. 2007.  Economic Feasibility of Aquaculture of Spiny Lobsters Jasus edwardsii in Temperate Waters.  Resources, Conservation and Recycling 69, December 2012, Pages 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00695.x

Gray C, Simanjuntak P, Sabur LK, Maspaitella PFL, Varley RCG. 2005. Introduction to Project Evaluation. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Rosalina D. 2013. Analysis of Business Feasibility of Catfish Farming in Tarpaulin Ponds in Namang Village, Central Bangka Regency. Maspari Journal, 2014, 6(1), 20-24. Department of Water Resources Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Fisheries and Biology Bangka Belitung University.

Maynou F, Morales-Nin B, Cabanellas-Reboredo M, Palmer M,  García E, Grau AM. 2013. Small-scale fishery in the Balearic Islands (W Mediterranean): A socio-economic approach.  Fisheries Research 139, 11-17.

Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Director General of Aquaculture. 2012 Aquaculture Directorate.

Litara L. 2015. Analysis of Freshwater Fish Culture in Riau Regency. Journal of Fisheries Dynamics Vol. 30, April 1, 2015.

Barnes-Mauthe M, Oleson KLL, Zafindrasilivonona B. 2013.  The total economic value of small-scale fisheries with a characterization of post-landing trends: An application in Madagascar with global relevance.  Fisheries Research 147, 175-185.

Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No 13 of 2008. Regarding Scale of Production in Fish Culture. Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia.

Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No Per 05/Men/2009. Concerning Scale of Production in Fish Culture by Indonesian Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

Robert L, Stephenson, Lane DE. 2011.  Fisheries Management Sciences: a plea for conceptual change.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1995, 52(9), 2051-2056, https://doi.org/10.1139/f95796.

Related Articles

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.

Impact of social media campaigns on farmers awareness of environmental conservation practices

Preeti Raina, Rahul Kumar Darji, Rahul Mittal, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 1-8, October 2025.

Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of ethanolic leaves extract of Psidium guajava

G. Saranya, K. Durgadevi, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 57-63, September 2025.

Physicochemical and phytochemical analysis of Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract

J. Ramalakshmi, P. Vinodhiniand, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 50-56, September 2025.