The effect of birth type on somatic cell and total bacteria counts in milk of dairy cows

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2017
Views (313) Download (7)

The effect of birth type on somatic cell and total bacteria counts in milk of dairy cows

Özlem Ertekin, Yeliz Yılmaz, Alirıza Şahin
Int. J. Biosci.10( 1), 242-245, January 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]


The aim of this study is to present some important knowledge about somatic cell and total bacteria counts of raw milk obtained from different birth types (twin or single) in dairy cows during first month of early lactation period. The dams of single and twin calves fed diets containing 60% forage and 40% concentrate. The effect of birth type on somatic cell and total bacteria levels independent two sampled t-test analysis method was used in this study. Somatic cell counts in raw milk of the cows giving birth to twin and single calves have statistical similarities. Similarly, there were no significant differences between total bacteria counts in milk of single and twin groups for early lactation period in this study. Further researches are needed for dairy species on somatic cell and total bacteria counts in their milk during early, middle and late lactation.


Çakir Sahilli Y, Çimen M. 2016. The effect of birth type and sex of kids on milk lactose levels.  International Journal of Biosciences 9(4), 365-368.

Cimen M. 2006. The Effect of Birth Type and Sex of Lambs on Fiber Diameter. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 2(6), 509-511.

Cimen M. 2007. The Milk Biochemical Parameters  and Sucking Behavior of Lambs until 35 D of Age. Asian Journal of Chemistry 19(4), 3152-3156.

Cimen M. 2012. The Effect of Separation from Dam on Sucking Duration and Frequency of Lambs. Indian Journal of Animal Research 46 (3), 284-287.

Çimen M. 2015. Fen ve Sağlık Bilimleri Alanlarında Spss uygulamalı Veri Analizi. Palme Yayıncılık, Yayın No: 905, ISBN: 978-605-355-366-3. Sıhhıye, Ankara.

Çimen M. 2016. Mühendislik Verilerinde Tek Örnek İçin Parametrik ve Parametrik Olmayan Testler. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi. 29, 67-77. (In Turkish).

Dimitar N, Hristov S, Andonov S, Trajchev M. 2014. Udder-related risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Veterınarskı Arhıv. 84(2), 111-127.

İnal T, Çimen M. 2016. Sığırlarda Ana Yaşının Süt  Biyokimyasal Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisi. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 5(1), 79-82 (In Turkish).

Jones GM. 2006. Understanding the basics of mastitis. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Publication No. 404-233. Virginia State Univ. Press, Virginia, USA, 1-7.

Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. 1997. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th Edn. Academic Press, New York, 39-386 P.

Norusis MJ. 1993. SPSS for Windows: Base System User’s Guide, SPSS, Chicago.

Olson JC, Mocquat G. 1980. Milk and Milk Products. In Microbial Ecology of Foods. Academic Press, N. Y., USA, 470 p.

Saxena M, Rai P. 2013. Microbiological and Chemical Analysis of Raw, Pasteurized and UHT Milk During Preservation in India. International Journal of Chem Tech Research 5(6), 2804-2809.

Yildirim S, Cimen M. 2009. Biochemical Factors Affecting Taste of Milks from Machine Milking.  Asian Journal of Chemistry 21(3), 2457-2460