Ultrasonographic biometry of cyclic and non-cyclic ovaries of queens

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2017
Views (577)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ultrasonographic biometry of cyclic and non-cyclic ovaries of queens

Depeesh Kumar Bhuptani, Allah Bux Memon, Hubdar Ali Kaleri, Rameez Raja Kaleri, Mujahid Ali Shah, Raza Ali Mangi, Zafar Khoso, Muhammad Amjad Jakhro, Syed Rashid Shah, Khurram Shah, Mujahid Ali Shah, Sheva Dari
Int. J. Biosci. 10(1), 285-293, January 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to evaluate the morphological characteristics and ultrasonographic biometrical echo characteristics of cyclic and non-cyclic ovaries in queens, the studies were carried out during the year 2012. Ultrasonographic biometry of left ovaries of non-cyclic queens showed 10.05 ±2.40 mm length, 5.27±1.11 mm width, 3.20±0.33 mm thickness, 25.1±2.71 mm circumference, 0.14±0.08 g weight and 0.40±0.13 cm2 volume; while their right ovaries showed 10.35±4.34 mm length, 4.70±0.90 mm width, 2.90±0.62 mm thickness, 24.10±8.93 mm circumference, 0.16±0.10 g weight and 0.40±0.17 cm2 volume. The examination on left ovaries of queens showed 3.75 ± 0.95 primary follicles, 3.75±0.50 secondary follicles, 3.25±1.50 tertiary follicles; while their right ovaries of queens showed 4.00±1.41 primary follicles, 3.25±1.25 secondary follicles, 3.00±1.15 tertiary follicles. It was concluded that the health and body condition score was significantly better for cyclic queens as compared to non-cyclic queens. Morpho-biometry measurements were higher in case of left ovaries than the right ovaries. Ultrasonographic biometry measurements were higher for left ovaries than the right ovaries of queens. Number of secondary follicles differed significantly in left and right ovary and non-significant for primary and tertiary follicles; there were non-significant differences in Morpho-biometry measurements in non-cyclic and cyclic queens.

Belsito KR, Vester BM, Keel T, Graves TK, Swanson KS. 2008. Impact of ovariohysterectomy and food intake on body composition, physical activity, and adipose gene expression in cats. Journal of Animal Science 20(2), 287-292.

Catbagan DL, Quimby JM, Mama KR, Rychel JK, Mich PM. 2011. Study the effects of ovariohysterectomy and biometry of ovaries using ultrasound machine in cats. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 72(4), 461-466.

Coe RJ, Grint MA, Tivers MS, Hotston A. 2007. Comparison of flank and midline approaches to the ovariohysterectomy of cats. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 19(3), 566-572.

Moser FB, Eilts BE and Williams DB. 2007. Ultrasonic measurement of queens ovaries. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2(5), 380-344.

Park M, Singh AM, Yahia M. 2011. Ovaries biometry and its relationship with body weight and semen output of queens. Journal of Surgery and Obstetrics 12(3), 55-59.

Place NJ, Hansen BS, Cheraskin JL, Cudney SE, Flanders JA, Newmark AD, Barry B, Scarlett JM. 2011. Study morpho-biometry in female cats. Journal of Veterinary Surgery 4(1), 22-27.

Pollari FL, Bonnett T. 2008. Evaluation of postoperative complications following elective surgeries of dogs and cats at private practices using computer records. Journal of Animal Science 47(4), 738-745.

Rohlertz M, Ström HB, Holst and Axner E. 2012. Comparison of ultrasonography and biometry of ovaries in cats. Journal of Animal Sciences 17(2), 291-298.

Settergren I. 1964. The ovarian morphology in clinical gonadal hypoplasia with some aspect of its endocrine relation. In  Acta  Veterinarian  Scandinviea.  Supp. I. Copenhagen p. 150-153.

Singh SS, Kelly AM, Konde LJ. 2009. Ovaries ultrasound in the normal cats. Journal of Veterinary Radiology 31(4), 195-199.

Steagall PVM, Taylor PM, Rodrigues MA, Ferreira TH, Min to BW, Aguiar AJA. 2009. Ultraonography biometry of ovaries in cats. Journal of Animal Science 38(2), 332-336.

Vaisanenm MA, Tuomikoski SK, Vainio OM. 2007. Behavioral alterations and severity of pain in cats recovering at home following elective ovariohysterectomy or castration. Journal of Small Animal Science 23(1), 236-242

Related Articles

Study on physico-morphological characteristics of Betel vine cv. Khasia pan genotypes grown in northeastern hilly region of Bangladesh

J. C. Sarker, F. Ahmed, M. H. M. B. Bhuyan, S. Debnath, S. M. L. Rahman, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 343-354, July 2025.

Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Rhizobium meliloti against plant pathogens

R. Nithyatharani, S. Subashini, M. Vinoth, R. Krishnan, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 336-342, July 2025.

Effect of rhizobial inoculant in combination with vermicompost and molybdenum on soybean in pot condition

Sharmin Ara Jannat, Md. Azizul Haque, Saiyera Chowdhury, Alif Hossain, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 328-335, July 2025.

Ectoparasite species diversity and prevalence in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) within delta central senatorial district, Delta State, Nigeria

Ede E. Lemy, Awharitoma O. Agnes, Orhewere D. A. Regina, Omoregie O. Anthony, Owhororo Ejiro, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 320-327, July 2025.

Assessment of wild bird diversity in a lake ecosystem under agricultural pressure during drought in Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Ekoun Michaël Konan, Coffi Jean Magloire Niamien, Valerie Florence Guétondé, Amari Diane Prisca Baka, Kouassi Hilaire Yaokokoré-Béibro, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 306-319, July 2025.

Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in 2,4,6-octatrienoic acid treated A549 and HCT-116 cancer cells

Shanmugam M. Sivasankaran, Raju Kowsalya, Krishnan Baskaran, Chakravarthy Elanchezhiyan, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 291-296, July 2025.

Public health implications of microbial contamination in registered slaughterhouses: A case study from La Union, Philippines

Carlo G. Fernandez, Harlene S. Fernandez, Priscilo P. Fontanilla Jr., Reinalyn D. Austria, Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 272-290, July 2025.