Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2012
Views (568)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

F. Alao, A.J. Oloruntade, K.O. Mogaji
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 2(6), 23-27, June 2012.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2012; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Yield quality response of pepper (Capsicum annum) under variable water application was examined during two off-seasons of 2007/08 and 2008/09 at the Agricultural Engineering Research Farm of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. The crop was irrigated using micro-sprinkler system that allowed three treatments 1, 2, 3 at 0.5 WR (water requirements) of pepper, 0.75 WR, and 1 WR respectively. The experiment was repeated twice and irrigation was carried out at 3-day interval. Soil and agronomic measurements were carried out at each treatment during the experiments while moisture content was monitored weekly using gravimetric method. Measurements made included leaf area index (LAI) and crop yield (results not shown), plant height (PH), fruit number (FN), fruit length (FL) and Fruit Width (FW). Results showed that the growth of pepper were not statistically different among treatments at the 5% level of significance. Plant height responded positively to increased water application and thus influencing yield positively. Yield of pepper was highest at the highest water application, ranging from 20.1 t/ha (2007/08) to 21.1 t/ha (2008/09); fruit number ranged between 21 to 19 for the highest treatment in 2007/08 and 2008/09 respectively while fruit length and fruit width also increased with increasing water application. It was then concluded that variations in water application might significantly influence yield quality such as fruit number, fruit length and fruit width at harvest. Variable irrigation water application for field grown pepper is therefore recommended for higher and better quality yields.

AVRDC. 1989. Tomato and the pepper production in the tropic. AVRDC; Taiwan. P. 585.

Dagdelen N, Yilmaz E, Sezgin F, Gurbuz T. 2004. Effects of Water Stress at Different growth Stages on Processing Pepper (Capsicum annum Cv. Kapija) Yield Water use and Quality Characteristics. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7(12), 2167-2172.

Olalla F, Valero JA. 1994. Growth and production of bell pepper under different irrigation intervals. Research series Arkansas – Agric Experimental Station. P. 125 -128.

Ngouajio M, Wang G, Goldy RG. 2008. Timing of Drip Irrigation Initiation Affects Irrigation Water Use Efficiency and Yield of Bell Pepper Under Plastic Mulch. Journal of HorticulturalTechnology 18(3), 397-402.

Pitts DJ, Clarke GA. 1991. Comparison of drip irrigation to sub- irrigation for tomato production in southwest Florida. Applied Engineering Agric 7(2), 117 -184.

Sezen SM, Yazar A, Eker S. 2006. Effect of drip irrigation regimes on yield and quality of field grown bell pepper. Agric. Water Manage 81, 115– 131.

Sezen SM, Yazar A, Eker S. 2011. Yield and quality response of drip-irrigated pepper under Mediterranean climatic conditions to various water regimes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(8), p. 1329-1339.

Tekinel O, yazar A, Cevik B, Kanber R. 1989. Ex-post evaluation of the Lower Seyhan Project in Turkey. In: Irrigation Theory and Practice (Eds. J. R. Rydzewski and C.F. Ward). Pentech Press. London. p. 145-152.

Related Articles

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.