Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2019
Views (648)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Andi Chairil Ichsan, Markum, Rato Firdaus Silamon
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 14(2), 111-116, February 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The establishment of Village Regulation Number 1 Year 2014 concerning biodiversity management in Aik Bual village was intended to guide the community forest management in order to be able to maintain the balance of ecosystem and increase the public awareness in environmental conservation efforts. However, since the regulation was implemented, there is no single information that provides an overview on the impact of its implementation. Thus, the purpose of the research is directed to measure the policy performance by referring to the six criteria developed by Dunn (2003). The research used evaluative policy approach with the scope of retrospective analysis (ex post). The data was collected using several instruments in the form of in-depth interview, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and literature study. The result indicates that the policy performance is in “good” category, with value of 2.39. Nevertheless, the research also identified some indicators need to be strengthened for optimizing the policy performance. Some of them pertain to the reinforcement of information system and the availability of policy activity data.

Bungin B. 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta (ID): Radja Grafindo Persada.

Chambers R. 1992. Rural Appraissal, Rapid, Relaxed and Partisipatory. Inst. Dev. Studies, Univ. of Sussex, England.

Desa Aik Bual. 2014. Peraturan Desa Nomor 1 tahun 2014 tentang pengelolaan keanekaragaman hayati di desa Aik Bual.

Desa Aik Bual. 2017. Laporan Tahunan Desa Aik Bual.

Dunn, William N. 2003. Analisa Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: PT. Prasetia Widia Pratama.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Panduan penilaian kinerja pembangunan KPH dengan Menggunakan Kriteria dan Indikator FWI 1.0. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Potret Keadaan Hutan Indonesia Periode 2009-2013. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Governance Forest Initiative Indonesia [GFI]. 2013. Potret Pelaksanaan Tata Kelola Hutan: Sebuah Studi Mendalam Di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah dan Nusa Tenggara Barat. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Ichsan AC. 2017. Kelembagaan Model Desa Konservasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (Doctoral dissertation, IPB (Bogor Agricultural University)).

Kasper W, Streit ME. 1998. Institutional Economics, Social Order and Policy. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK. and Northampton, MA. USA.

Mulyana D. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

North D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho B. 2013. Reformasikelembagaan dan tata pemerintahan. Faktor Pemungkin Menuju Tata Kelola Kehutanan Yang Baik. In: Kartodihardjo H, editor. Kembali Ke Jalan Lurus. Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Yogyakarta (ID): Nailil Printika.

Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Common: The Evolution of Institution for Collective action. New New York (US): Cambridge University Press.

Sevilla CG. 1993 Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Penerjemah; Alimudin Tuwu dan Alam Syah. Jakarta: UI Press.

Situmorang, Abdul Wahib. 2013. Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan, lahan, dan REDD+ 2012 Di Indonesia. Jakarta : UNDP Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatf, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Wiyono. 2006. Kehutanan Multipihak Langkah Menuju Perubahan. Bogor: Center For International Forestry Research.

Related Articles

Assessment of physicochemical properties of various sources of water and their impact on human health

S. Rizwana Begum, T. A. K Mumtaz Begum, Mrs. Nousheen Irfana, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 25-34, November 2025.

Assessment of macroinvertebrate diversity and water quality of the Malaprabha river near Munavalli, Belagavi district, Karnataka state, India

Mr. Shama Shavi, Rajeshwari D. Sanakal, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 12-24, November 2025.

Impact of sewage sludge on plant diversity in the Nomayos area, in the central regions of Cameroon

Valerie Njitat Tsama, Yanick Borel Kamga, Valerie Guy Wafo Djumyom, François Victor Nguetsop, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 95-105, October 2025.

An investigation of phytochemical constitutents and pharmacological activities of Strobilanthes andamanensis leaf extract

Deepika, V. Ambikapathy, S. Babu, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 86-94, October 2025.

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.