Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2019
Views (780)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Andi Chairil Ichsan, Markum, Rato Firdaus Silamon
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 14(2), 111-116, February 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The establishment of Village Regulation Number 1 Year 2014 concerning biodiversity management in Aik Bual village was intended to guide the community forest management in order to be able to maintain the balance of ecosystem and increase the public awareness in environmental conservation efforts. However, since the regulation was implemented, there is no single information that provides an overview on the impact of its implementation. Thus, the purpose of the research is directed to measure the policy performance by referring to the six criteria developed by Dunn (2003). The research used evaluative policy approach with the scope of retrospective analysis (ex post). The data was collected using several instruments in the form of in-depth interview, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and literature study. The result indicates that the policy performance is in “good” category, with value of 2.39. Nevertheless, the research also identified some indicators need to be strengthened for optimizing the policy performance. Some of them pertain to the reinforcement of information system and the availability of policy activity data.

Bungin B. 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta (ID): Radja Grafindo Persada.

Chambers R. 1992. Rural Appraissal, Rapid, Relaxed and Partisipatory. Inst. Dev. Studies, Univ. of Sussex, England.

Desa Aik Bual. 2014. Peraturan Desa Nomor 1 tahun 2014 tentang pengelolaan keanekaragaman hayati di desa Aik Bual.

Desa Aik Bual. 2017. Laporan Tahunan Desa Aik Bual.

Dunn, William N. 2003. Analisa Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: PT. Prasetia Widia Pratama.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Panduan penilaian kinerja pembangunan KPH dengan Menggunakan Kriteria dan Indikator FWI 1.0. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Potret Keadaan Hutan Indonesia Periode 2009-2013. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Governance Forest Initiative Indonesia [GFI]. 2013. Potret Pelaksanaan Tata Kelola Hutan: Sebuah Studi Mendalam Di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah dan Nusa Tenggara Barat. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Ichsan AC. 2017. Kelembagaan Model Desa Konservasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (Doctoral dissertation, IPB (Bogor Agricultural University)).

Kasper W, Streit ME. 1998. Institutional Economics, Social Order and Policy. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK. and Northampton, MA. USA.

Mulyana D. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

North D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho B. 2013. Reformasikelembagaan dan tata pemerintahan. Faktor Pemungkin Menuju Tata Kelola Kehutanan Yang Baik. In: Kartodihardjo H, editor. Kembali Ke Jalan Lurus. Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Yogyakarta (ID): Nailil Printika.

Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Common: The Evolution of Institution for Collective action. New New York (US): Cambridge University Press.

Sevilla CG. 1993 Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Penerjemah; Alimudin Tuwu dan Alam Syah. Jakarta: UI Press.

Situmorang, Abdul Wahib. 2013. Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan, lahan, dan REDD+ 2012 Di Indonesia. Jakarta : UNDP Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatf, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Wiyono. 2006. Kehutanan Multipihak Langkah Menuju Perubahan. Bogor: Center For International Forestry Research.

Related Articles

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.

Ethnomedicinal plant knowledge of the Manobo indigenous people in Agusan del Sur, Philippines

Ferdinand A. Dumalagan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 117-128, April 2026.

Exploitation and threat traits of the Hoplobatrachus occipitalis community, an economically important frog in the Poro region, Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Kien Kouassi Brahiman*, Aka Sesseho Guy Roger, Ndiaye Awa, Kouamelan Essetchi Paul, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 108-116, April 2026.

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.