Inheritance of agronomic traits in the generations from the cross between Arta and Arg wheat cultivars under water deficit stress

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2018
Views (477) Download (19)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Inheritance of agronomic traits in the generations from the cross between Arta and Arg wheat cultivars under water deficit stress

Masoumeh Nemati, Mohammad Moghaddam Vahed, Majid Norouzi, Mahmoud Toorchi, Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi
J. Bio. Env. Sci.13( 6), 24-31, December 2018.
Certificate: JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Knowledge about the type of gene action involved in the expression of a trait is essential for conducting a proper breeding program. In this investigation the inheritance of grain yield and twelve important agronomic traits of wheat was studied through generations mean analysis. The experiment was carried out in the experimental station of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran, for two years (2016 and 2017). The generations were produced from the cross of Arg and Arta varieties. In each year, a split plot design was conducted based on randomized complete blocks with three replications. The irrigation conditions were arranged in the main plots and generations in the subplots. In the stress condition, irrigation was withheld after pollination. Analysis of variance showed significant differences among generations or significant generation × yearinteraction for majority of the traits under study. Generation mean analysis at both normal and water deficit conditions revealed that additive, dominance and epistatic effects were involved in the inheritance of majority of these traits, with the ranges of 0.16-5.57, 0.32-164.16 and -0.02-153.9, respectively. However, the dominance effects and dominance by dominance interaction (from 3.69 to 153.9) were more important than other types. The average degree of dominance for all traits in both normal and water deficit conditions was greater than unity (from 1.94 to 3.81), which indicated the existence of over-dominance gene action in controlling the traits under investigation. In conclusion, our results indicated the necessity of exploiting dominance gene action in wheat breeding programs.

VIEWS 13

Anonymous. 2013. Identification and releasing of nine new wheat and barley cultivars adapted to drought prone environments of South Khorasan Province, Iran (In Persian). http://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/4338.180.

Bnejdi F, El Gazzah M. 2010. Epistasis and genotype-by-environment interaction of grain yield related traits in durum wheat. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 2(2), 24-29.

Farooq M, Hussain M, Siddique KHM. 2014. Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33(4), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.8752.91

Ferrari ED, Ferreira VA, Grassi EM, Picca AMT, Paccapelo HA. 2018. Genetic parameters estimation in quantitative traits of a cross of triticale (x Triticosecale W.). Open Agriculture 3(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0003

Gooding MJ, Ellis RH, Shewry PR, Schofield JD. 2003. Effects of restricted water availability and increased temperature on the grain filling, drying and quality of winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 37(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0501

Gustafson P, Raskina O, Ma X, Nevo E. 2009. Wheat evolution, domestication, and improvement. In: Carver,B.F. (Editor). Wheat: Science and Trade. Wiley-Blackwell, p 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/978081381.8832.ch1

Ijaz U, Smiullah, Kashif M. 2013. Genetic study of quantitative traits in spring wheat through generation means analysis. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 13(2), 191-197.

Liu H, Searle IR, Mather DE, Able AJ, Able JA. 2015. Morphological, physiological and yield responses of durum wheat to pre-anthesis water-deficit stress are genotype-dependent. Crop and Pasture Science 66(10), 1024-1038. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP150.13

Ljubicic N, Petrovic S, Dimitrijevic M, Hristov N. 2016. Gene actions involved in the inheritance of yield related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 28(7), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2016-02-117

Longin CF, Muhleisen J, Maurer HP, Zhang H, Gowda M, Reif JC. 2012. Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125(6), 1087–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1967-7

Mather K, Jinks JL. 1982. Biometrical Genetics. The Study of Continuous Variation. Third edition.Chapman and Hall, London.

Moll RH, Lindsey MF, Robinson HF. 1964. Estimates of genetic variances and level of dominance in maize. Genetics 49(3), 411-423.

Molla Heydari Bafghi R, Baghizadeh A, Mohammadinezhad GH. 2017. Evaluation of salinity and drought stresses tolerance in wheat genotypes usingtolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding 9(23), 27-34 (In Persian with the English Abstract).

Muller J. 1991. Determining leaf surface area by means oflinear measurements in wheat and triticale (brief report). Archiv fur Zuchtungs Forschung 21(2), 121-123.

Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Momčilović I, Ristic Z. 2011. Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(6), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00477.x

Saeidi M, Abdoli M. 2015. Effect of drought stress during grain filling on yield and its components, gas exchange variables and some physiological traits of wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17(4), 885-898.

Said AA. 2014. Generation mean analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress conditions. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 59(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2014.11.00.3

SAS. Institute. 2009. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics Version 9.2 for Windows. SAS Institute, Carry, NC, USA.

Srivastava AK, Pasala R, Minhas PS, Suprasanna P. 2016. Plant bioregulators for sustainable agriculture: integrating redox signaling as a possible unifying mechanism. Advances in Agronomy 137, 237-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.12.00.2