Morphological evaluation of Capsicum spp. diversity in Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2016
Views (948)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Morphological evaluation of Capsicum spp. diversity in Iran

Abdlollahmohammadi, Mostafa Pourazarm, Mahyar Rohami
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 9(1), 224-230, July 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

48 genotypes of Capsicum spp. obtained from National Plant Gene Bank of Iran. The experiment was conducted as an alpha lattice design and 11 important morphological traits were measured based on IPGRI descriptor. Analysis of variance, Principle Component Analysis, cluster analysis and stepwise regression were performed for all variables. All studied morphological traits showed significant differences among the genotypes. Principle component analysis revealed the first four components can justify over 79% of total variances. The cluster analysis (UPGMA) based on fruit length and fruit width classified all genotypes into four groups. According to the results of stepwise regression analysis 59.65% of the total variation in fruit fresh weight could be attributed to total plant weight, fruit wall thickness and fruit length. The identified diversity between genotypes showed its important potential for breeding program in Capsicum spp.

Bozokalfa MK, Esiyok D, Turhan K. 2009. Patterns of phenotypic variation in a germplasm collection of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) from Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research 7, 83-95.

De Teodoro-Pardo CV, García-Velázquez A, Corona-Torres T. 2007. Chromosome Polymorphism in Capsicum annuum L. (Solanaceae) In Collections from Puebla, Morelos and Queretaro. Agrociencia 41, 873-881.

Eshbaugh WH. 1993. History and exploitation of a serendipitous new crop discovery, In new crops, Janick J. and Simon J.E. Eds., New York. USA: Wiley, 132-139.

Geleta LF, Labuschagne MT, Viljoen CD. 2005. Genetic Variability in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Estimated by Morphological Data and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2361–2375.

Ghazizadeh S, Hasani ME, Mohammadi A, Bahramirad M. 2010. Evaluation of genetic diversity in pepper genotypes using morphological traits. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 41, 71-82.

Ipgri, Avrdc and Catie. 1995. Descriptors for Capsicum (Capsicum spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy; the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taipei, Taiwan, and the Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Costa Rica.

Lanteri S, Pickersgill B. 1993. Chromosome structural changes in Capsicum annuum L. and C. chinense Jacq. Euphytica 67, 155-160.

Lippert LF, Smith PG, Bergh BO. 1966.  Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops. Garden pepper, Capsicum sp. Botanical Review 32, 24-55.

Palafox-Carlos H, Ayala-Zavala JF, González-Aguilar GA. 2011. The Role of Dietary Fiber in the Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Fruit and Vegetable Antioxidants. J of Food Sci 76, R6–R15.

Patel PN, Fougat RS, Sasidharan N. 2009. Studies on genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in chillies (Capsicum annuum L.). Research on Crops 10, 626-631.

Peeraullee N, Ranghoo-Sanmukhiya VM. 2013. Assessment of genetic diversity in local chilli (Capsicum annuum) varieties in Mauritius. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 15, 891–896.

Pozzobon MT, Schifino-Wittmann MT, BianchettiL DB. 2005. Chromosome numbers in wild and semidomesticated Brazilian Capsicum L. (Solanaceae) species: do x = 12 and x = 13 represent two evolutionary lines? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151, 259-269.

Rohami M, Mohammadi A, Khosroshahli M, Ahmadi H, Darandeh N. 2010. Karyotype Analysis of several Ecotypes of Capsicum annuum L. in Iran. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38, 177-180.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.