Effect of planting density on growth, development and yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/09/2022
Views (1989)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of planting density on growth, development and yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Md. Nurul Huda, Shahadat Hossain, Tanzim Jahan, Md. Arfan Ali, Md. Golap Hossain
Int. J. Biosci. 21(3), 209-214, September 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of planting density on the growth, development, and yield of tomatoes during the Rabi season 2019-2020. Plant height, number of primary branches, number of flowers per cluster, number of fruits per cluster, number of fruits per plant, individual fruit weight, fruit yield per plant, total yield, marketable yield, and unmarketable yield were recorded. Results showed that maximum plant height and unmarketable yield were recorded at 40,000 plants ha-1. However, number of primary branches, number of flowers per cluster, number of fruits per cluster, number of fruits per plant, individual fruit weight, and fruit yield per plant were higher at 25,000 plants ha-1. Moreover, the maximum total yield and marketable yield were recorded at 28,571 plants ha-1 and the minimum at 40,000 plants ha-1. Therefore, our present study recommended cultivating tomato crops at 28,571 plants ha-1 to obtain a higher yield.

Alam MS, Huda MN, Rahman MS, Azad AKM, Rahman MM, Molla MM. 2019. Character association and path analysis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 22(1), 1815-1822. DOI: 10.18801/jbar.220119.223.

Assefa W, Tesfaye B, Dessalegn L. 2015. Influence of Inter-Intra Row Spacing on Yield Losses of Tomato Cultivars. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(2), 15-28.

BBS. 2021. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics-2020. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 340-341. www.bbs.gov.bd.

FAOSTAT. 2022. FAOSTAT statistical database. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data /QC/visualize. Accessed February 17, 2022.

Guade YF. 2017. Effect of Intra-Row Spacing on Growth and Development of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Variety Roma-VF under the Irrigated Conditions of East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 17(2), 174-178.

Hamid AA, Salih SO, Abdalla AE, El Naim AM. 2010. Effect of Sowing Date and Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum, Mill.). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 6(5), 665-669.

Hossain MG, Ali MA, Ripa RA, Ayrin S, Mahmood S. 2019. Influence of Rootstocks on Yield and Quality of Summer Tomato cv. ‘BARI Tomato-4’. Earth Systems and Environment 3(2), 289- 300. DOI: 10.1007/s41748-019-00101-4.

Huda MN, Jahan T, Taj HFE, Asiry KA. 2020. A Newly Emerged Pest of Tomato [Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)]: In Bangladesh- A Review on Its Problems and Management Strategies. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 21(3), 1-16.

Hussen S, Kemal M, Wasie M. 2013. Effect of Intra-row Spacing on Growth and Development of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) Var. Roma VF, at the experimental site of Wollo University, South Wollo, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 10(1), 19-24.

Law-Ogbomo KE, Egharevba RKA. 2009. Effects of Planting Density and NPK Fertilizer Application on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Lycospersicon esculentum Mill) in Forest Location. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(2), 152-158.

Maboko MM, Du Plooy CP, Chiloane S. 2017. Yield of determinate tomato cultivars grown in a closed hydroponic system as affected by plant spacing. Horticultura Brasileira 35, 258-264. DOI 10.1590/S0102-053620170217.

Maboko MM, Du Plooy CP. 2018. Response of Field-Grown Indeterminate Tomato to Plant Density and Stem Pruning on Yield. International Journal of Vegetable Science 24(6), 612-621.

Nganga GM. 2017. Effect of plant spacing and inorganic fertilizer rate on tomato seed production. MS thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya, 16-22.

Papadopoulos AP, Ormrod DP. 1991. Plant spacing effects on growth and development of the greenhouse tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71(1), 297-304. DOI: 10.4141/cjps91-040.

Prodhan MAA, Ali MA, Zomo SA, Sarkar MD, Parvin K, Haque FA. 2014. Organic manure and spacing affecting floral and yield characters of tomato. International journal of business, social and scientific research 2(2), 90-94.

Rashid A, Rab A, Mohammad H, Ali J, Shahab M, Jamal A, Rehman A, Ali M. 2016. Effect of row spacing and nitrogen levels on the growth & yield of tomato under walk-in polythene tunnel condition. Pure and Applied Biology 5(3), 426-438. DOI: 10.19045/bspab.2016.50055.

Shanmukhi CH, Reddy MLN, Rao AVDD, Babu AP. 2017. Effect of planting density and fertigation on growth and yield of processing tomato varieties. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology 5(3) (Special issue-2), 78-81.

Shanmukhi CH, Reddy MLN, Rao AVDD, Babu PA. 2018. Flowering and yield in processing tomato varieties as influenced by planting density and fertigation. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(2), 3481-3485.

Tuan N, Mao N. 2015. Effect of Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at Thai Nguyen, Vietnam. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 7(6), 357-361. DOI: 10.9734/IJPSS/2015/18573.

Warner J, Hao X, Zhang TQ. 2002. Effects of row arrangement and plant density on yield and quality of early, small-vined processing tomatoes. Effects of row arrangement and plant density on yield and quality of early, small-vined processing tomatoes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 765-770.

Zakher AG. 2017. Effect of plant density and spraying with aluminum silicate on fruit yield and quality of processing tomato grown in summer season. Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2, 149-167.

Related Articles

Modelling the current and future distribution of Okoubaka aubrevillei Pellegr. & Normand under climate change scenarios in Côte d’Ivoire

Sié Fernand Pacôme Ouattara, Franck Placide Junior Pagny, Kouassi Bruno Kpangui, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 237-246, November 2025.

Proximate analysis of pelleted sorghum-based feeds as substitute for corn

I. I. Juan S. Daquioag, Michael M. Uy, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 232-236, November 2025.

Evolution of the weight of carcasses and offal of Cobb 500 broiler chickens according to the age of slaughter

Soro Soronikpoho, Kouadio Kouakou Parfait, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, Brou Gboko Konan Gatien, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 225-231, November 2025.

Agronomic performance of the newly pruned coffee trees at the CSU Lal-lo old coffee plantation

Maribel L. Fernandez, Florante Victor M. Balatico, Ronel A. Collado, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 217-224, November 2025.

A comprehensive review and meta-analysis on Alzheimer’s genetics: Exploring the genetic architecture and its application in future genomic medicine

Shafee Ur Rehman, Shabeer Khan, Muhammad Usman, Sakarie Khadar Ibrahim, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 204-216, November 2025.

Effect of aqueous leaf extract of Senna occidentalis (Fabaceae) on induced arrhythmia in Rabbits

Obrou Jean Luc Amiltone, Nagalo Ousmane, Mossoun Mossoun Arsène, Abo Kouakou Jean-Claude, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 198-203, November 2025.

Targeting proteolytic enzymes in the hemoglobin degradation pathway to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum: An in silico approach

Sethupathi Virumandi, Elumalai Balamurugan, Aakash Ganesan, Sowmiya Ganesan, Srinidhi Raveenthiran, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 182-197, November 2025.

Composition and variation of milk from Djallonké goats fed with different diets in Burkina Faso

Alice Gisèle Sidibé-Anago, Vinsoun Millogo, Assouan Gabriel Bonou, Remadji Rufine Djikoldingam, Mariétou Sissao, Michel Kéré, Guy Apollinaire Mensah, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 173-181, November 2025.