Effects of land use change on some physical and chemical properties of soil in rangelands of Kerman Province

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2015
Views (732)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of land use change on some physical and chemical properties of soil in rangelands of Kerman Province

Ali Reza Moradi, Mohammad Jafari, Hossein Arzani, Mahdieh Ebrahimi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(5), 447-455, May 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This research was aimed to investigate the effects of land use change in three study regions of Kerman province. In this regard, a control site (rangeland) and a site with land use change were selected. Soil samples were taken from two depths (0-30 and 30-60 cm). Soil parameters including sand(%), clay (%), silt (%), lime (%), organic matter, total nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, EC and pH were measured. The results of land use change from rangeland to agriculture at 0-30 cm soil depth in three studied regions showed that in,Dehsard(Orzooiyeh), soil phosphorous was doubled, sand percentage decreased to 7%, and other soil properties did not show significant difference between these two land uses. In Koohsefid, no significant difference was foundin the studied soil properties. In Kaluk, soil nitrogen was doubled and clay percentage decreased to 7% and other soil properties did not show significant differences. According to the obtained results of land use change from rangeland to agriculture at 30-60 cm soil depth in three studied regions, in Dehsard potassium and phosphorous increased significantly to 16 and 3.3 mg kg-1, respectively and no significant differences were found for other soil parameters. In Kaluk, pH declined to 1.5 and sand percentage decreased to 8.63%. In the mentioned site, EC, phosphorous and potassium increased to 0.06 dsm-1, 3.3 mg kg-1 and 36.9 mg kg-1, respectively and other soil properties did not vary. InKoohsefid, clay percentage increased to 9.8% and sand percentage decreased to 14.24% while no significant differences were found for other soil properties.

Agusilar R, Kelly EF. 1998.Effects of soil in northern Great Plains rangeland. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1081- 1085.

Celik I. 2005. Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterraneanhighland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 83, 270-277.

Jones MJ. 1971. The maintenance of soil organic matter under continuous cultivation at Samaru, Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci. 77, 473-482.

Jafari Haqiqi M. 2003. Analytical methods for sampling and analysis of soil physical and chemical principles with emphasis on theory and practical publications ZohaNeda.

Jafari M, Sarmadian F. 2003. Fundamentals of Soil Science and Soil Classification.Printing.Tehran University Press.

Haj Abbasi M, Jalalian A, Khajehdin J, Karimzade H. 2002. A Case Study of the effects of rangeland to cropland on some physical characteristics, cultivable soil fertility index. BorougenJournal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 6(1), 149-160.

Kapoor M, Kelejian HH, Prucha IR. 2007. Panel Data Model with Spatially Correlated Error Components.” Journal of Econometrics 140(1), 97-130. TSP and Stata software.+

Kizilkaya R, Dengi O. 2010. Variation of land use and land cover effects on some soil physicalchemical characteristics and soil enzyme activity. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 97(2), 15-24.

Martinez-Mena M, Lopez J, Almagro M, Boix-Fayos V, Albaladejo J. 2008, Effect ofWater Erosion and Cultivation on the Soil Carbon Stock in a Semiarid Area ofSouth-East Spain, Soil and Tillage Research 99, 119-129.

Mohammadi J, Khademi H, Nael M. 2010.Study the Variability of Soil Quality inSelected Ecosystems of Central Zagros 9(3), 105-120.

Mojadadi H, Jalali AM, Smailpour S, Bahmanyar MA. 2012.The effects of land use change of forests on chemical properties of soil Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 97, 1-6.

Mofidi M, Alijanpour A, SheidaiKarkaj E, Rashtbari M, Motamedi J, 2012.Human-induced impacts of land use management on soil properties (case study: high-altitude area of Sahand mountain rangelands, East Azerbaijan-Iran). Inter. Res. J. Appl. Bas. Sci. 3(10), 1993-2002.

Olsen SR, Sommers LE. 1982. Phosphorus. p 416-418. In: A.L. Page et al. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Agron. Mongr. 9. 2nd ed. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI..

Salardini A. 1995. Soil fertility. Tehran University Press.

Sanchez M, Soriano M, Delgado G, Delgado R. 2002. Soil quality in mediterraneam mountain environment:effects of land use change. Soil science society of America Journal 66, 958-984.

Shiranpour  B,  Bahrami  A,  Shabanpour  M. 2012. Effects of Converting Forest to Tea Garden on Soil Fertility in Guilan Province. Journal of Water and Soil 26, No.4, Sept.-Oct. 2012, 826-831.

Solaimani K, Azmudeh A. 2010.The role of land use changes on some physical properties, chemical and soil erosion. Physical Geography Research 42 (74), 123 111.

Stevenson FJ. 1994. Humus chemistry. Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New York, Wiley.

Yusefifard M, Khademy H, Jalalian A. 2007. Soil quality control over land use change Meadow Springs area Ali chaharMahalBakhtiari province, Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources.Volume.The first number. Special Natural Resources.

Zehtabian GH, Khosravi H. 2009, investigation on effect of agricultural management on land degradation- a case study in Taleghan Region, Iran. 7th international symposium on plant-soil interaction at low PH, South China University of Technology Press, Guangzhou.

Zarrinkafsh M. 2002. Applied soil. Evaluation and quantitative analysis of the soil-water-plant morphology, University of Tehran Press. 245 p.

Related Articles

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.