Bio-hydrogen Production from sago effluent

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2013
Views (1001)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Bio-hydrogen Production from sago effluent

Kandasamy Sabariswaran, Paramasamy Papitha, Ravichandran Indumathi, Sundararaj Selvakumar, Samuel Paul Raj
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(2), 17-23, February 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The present study focuses on the exploitation of Sago effluent as a source for hydrogen production. Hydrogen production was investigated at different parameters namely pH, Temperature and substrate. The pH was varied from 4.0 – 6.5, temperature ranges from 30°C – 70°C and substrate concentration (Glucose and Nitrogen) varied from 0.25 g/l – 1.25 g/l and their interaction on hydrogen gas production were studied. The raw cow dung was used as inoculums for hydrogen gas production. In this study revealed that the maximum hydrogen production was occurred in acidic condition (pH 5.5). The highest rate of hydrogen production was observed at 1.25 g/l of substrate concentration (both Glucose and Nitrogen) under 55 °C.

Antonopoulou G, Gaval HN, Skiadas IV, Angelopoulos K, G Lyberatos. 2006. Biofuels generation from sweet sorghum: Fermentative hydrogen production and anaerobic digestion of the remaining biomass. Bioresource Technology, 1-10.

APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th Edn, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, New York.

Armor JN. The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H2. 1999. Applied Catalyst 176, 159– 176.

Benemann J. 1996. Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects. Nature Biotechnology. 14, 1101–1103.

Bisaillon A, Turcot J, Hallenbeck PC. 2006. The effect of nutrient limitation on hydrogen production by batch cultures of Escherichia coli. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31, 1504– 1508.

Demirel B, Yenigun O. 2002. Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes- a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 77, 743-755.

Kargi F, Kapdan IK. 2006. Biohydrogen production from waste materials. International Hydrogen Energy Congress and Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey.

Karlsson A, Vallin L, Ejlertsson J. 2008. Effects of temperature, hydraulic retention time and hydrogen extraction rate on hydrogen production from the fermentation of food industry residues and manure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33, 953-962.

Khanal S, Chen WH, Li L, Sung S. 2004. Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29, 1123-1131.

Lattin WC, Utgikar VP. 2007. Transition to hydrogen economy in the United States: 2006 status report. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32, 3230-3237.

Li CL, Fang HHP. 2007. Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 37, 1–39.

Nath K, Das D. 2004. Improvement of fermentative hydrogen production: various approaches. Journal of Applied Microbiology 65, 520-529.

Neha P, Shibu G, Pillai, Ankur H. Dwivedi. 2011. International conference on current trends in technology, ‘Nuicone’.

Pakarinen O, Lehtomäki A, Rintala J. 2008. Batch dark fermentative hydrogen production from grass silage: The effect of inoculum, pH, temperature and VS ratio. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33, 594 – 601.

Parawira W. 2004. Anaerobic treatment of agricultural residues and wastewater. PhD Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.

Thong S, Prasertsan P, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. 2008. 16s rRNA-targeted probes for specific detection of Thermoanaerobacterium sp., Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum, and Caldicellulosiruptor spp. By fluorescent in situ hybridization in biohydrogen producing systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33, 6082 – 6091.

Hydrogen Pasteur Plan (An integrated research, development and demonstration plan) 2004. United States Department of Energy (USDE).

Van Ginkel S, Sung S. 2001. Bio hydrogen production as a function of pH and Substrate concentration. Environmental Science and Technology 35, 24.

Wang JL, Wan W. 2008. Effect of temperature on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33, 5392–5397.

Whitten KW, Davis RE, Peck L, Stanley CG. 2009. Chemistry, 9th edition, Brooks Cole, ISBN 978-0-49-539163-0.

Winter CJ. 2005. In to the hydrogen energy economy-milestones. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30, 681–685.

Yokoyama H, Moriya N, Ohmori H, Waki M, Ogino A, Tanaka Y. 2007. Community analysis of hydrogen-producing extreme thermophilic anaerobic microflora enriched from cow manure with five substrates. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 77, 213-222.

Zhang T, Liu H, Fang HHP. 2003. Biohydrogen production from starch in wastewater under thermophilic conditions. Journal of Environmental Management 69, 149–156.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.