Preference value study of the species grazed by sheep in semi-steppe rangelands in west Azerbaijan of Iran using preference value index during the grazing season
Paper Details
Preference value study of the species grazed by sheep in semi-steppe rangelands in west Azerbaijan of Iran using preference value index during the grazing season
Abstract
Management of rangelands is dependent on optimal management of livestock grazing. Selecting an appropriate livestock type is one of the most important management decisions in grazing management of livestock. Considering preference value of plant species available is critical to ensure management’s success in achieving the goals. The present study aimed to investigate and determine preference value of plant species. For this purpose, species selection index was used to determine preference value of range species. Results showed that the effects of month and year were significant at 1% level of probability, while the effect of species was significant at 5% level of probability. Furthermore, among interaction effects, the interaction effects of “year x species” and “year x month x species” were significant at 1% level of probability, also interaction effect of “month x species” was significant at 5% level of probability. Meanwhile, interaction effect of “year x month” was not significant. The maximum and minimum preference values were obtained for “Astragalus effuses” (1.42) and “Ziziphora clinopodioides” (0.49), respectively. The effect of month on preference value was significant at 1% level of probability. The highest and the lowest preference value were recorded for the months of June (1.23) and August (0.50), respectively.
Ahmadi A, Peiravi M. 2009. Effects of animal age and different months of grazing season on grazing behavior and diet selection of Zandi ewes grazing in steppe rangelands (case study: Yekke bagh, Qom). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research 16, 536-5560.
Arzani H, Ahmadi A, Azarnivand H, Jafari AA. 2006. Determination and comparison forage quality of five species in three phonological stages. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 37, 303-311.
Arzani H, Zohdi M, Fish E, Zahedi A, Nikkhah GHA, Wester D. 2004. Phenolojical effects on forage quality of five grass species. Journal of Range Management 57, 624-630.
Baghestani N, Arzani H, Zare T, Abdollahi J. 2001. Study of forage quality the important species of stepic rangeland of Poshtkhoeh Yazd. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research 11,137-162.
Baghestani N. 2005. Harvesting time and rate in arid lands with regards to rainfall regime, the Management of Arid Regions Conference Proceedings. Technical Office of pasture, 84 pages.
Barcsak Z. 1994. Correlation between the palatability of grasses and their soluble sugar contents. Novenytemeles 48, 221-228.
Barrton ChM, Barrton MD, Naseri M, Kamali Nrjad M, Bazargan M. 2007. Essential oil Composition and antibacterial effects of Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases ICC, Munich, Germany, 31 Mar-04 Apr: Abstract .number: 1733-303.
Becker K, Lohrmann J. 1992. Feed selection by goats on tropical semi-humid rangeland. Small Rumin 8, 285–98.
Delavaripour A. 2005. Comparison of palatability of some important range species in Darbid (Yazd) In relation to sheep and goat grazing, M.sc Thesis of range management, Islamic Azad University, Iran, branch of science and research.
Ghadaki MB, Van Soest PY, Mcdowell RE, Malekpour B. 1974. Composition and In-vitro digestibility of some arid zone forage from Iran. In: XII International Grassland Congress III, 542-549.
Heanley SR, Smith DJ, Raats JG. 2001. Evaluation 3 techniques for determining dietcomposition. Journal of Range Management 54, 582-588.
Hunt WF, Hay RJM. 1990. A photographic technique for assessing the pasture species preference of grazing animals. Proccedings of the New Zealand Association 51, 191-196.
Hussain F, Durrani MJ. 2009. Seasonal availability, palaitability and animal preferences of forage plant in Harboi Arid Rangeland, Kalat, Pakistan. Pak. J.Bot 41, 539-554.
Malan PJ, Rethman NFG. 2003. Selection preference of sheep grazing different Atriplex species, 7 th international rangeland congress, Durban, Ireland.
Moghaddam MR. 1998. Pasture and Range Management, Tehran University Press, 470 pp.
Norton BW, Waterfall MH. 2000. The nutrient value of tipunatiou and calliandra calochrasus as supplements to low-quality straw for goats. Small Ruminant Research 38, 175-182.
Papachriston TG, Dziba LE, Provenza FD. 2005. Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. J. Small Ruminant Research 59, 141-156.
Pfister JA, Malechek JC. 1986. Dietary selection by goats and sheep in a deciduous woodland of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Range Management 39, 24-28.
Rangbari AMR, Jowhari M. 2005. Studying of grazing behaviour of sheep and goat during grazing season in Semirom rangelands, proceedings of second seminar of sheep and goats of Iran.
Rogosic J, Pfister JA, Provenza FD, Grbesa D. 2006. Sheep and goat preference for and nutritional value of Mediterranean maquis shrubs. Small Ruminant Research 64, 169–179.
Senft R, Rittenhouse L, Woodmanse RG. 1985. Factors Influencing Patterns of Cattle Grazing Behavior on Shortgrass Steppe. Journal of Range Management 38, 82-87.
Sanon HO, Kabor´e-Zoungrana C, Ledin I. 2007. Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Ruminant Research 67, 64-74.
Van Dyne GM, Heady HF. 1965. Botanical composition of sheep and cattle diets on a mature annual range. Journal of Agriculture Science Hilgardia 36, 465-468.
Ahmad Ahmadi, Hassan Yeganeh, Hossein Piry sahragard, Ehsan Zandi Esfahan, Hasan Barati, Elahe Ahmadi, 2013. Preference value study of the species grazed by sheep in semi-steppe rangelands in west Azerbaijan of Iran using preference value index during the grazing season. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 3(10), 42-51.
Copyright © 2013 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.