Assessing biomass stability of barley (hordeum voulgar l.) genotypes under salinity at early growth stage

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2017
Views (690)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessing biomass stability of barley (hordeum voulgar l.) genotypes under salinity at early growth stage

Hossein Askari, Seiyed Kamal Kazemitabar, Hamid Najafi Zarrini, Mohammad Hossein Saberi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 10(6), 76-82, June 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

As a result, the development of salinity-tolerant crops is an important option for maintaining crop production in saline soil so this study was performed to assess tolerance, stability and selection criteria of barley genotypes under salinity stress. Nine barley genotypes (STW82153 (A), MBS8712 (B), ESBYTM8910 (C), 4Shori (D), 5Shori (E), WB7910 (F), Valfajr (G), MBS8715 (H) and Jo torsh (I)) in five salinity levels (electrical conductivities, ds/m) (S1 (control) =4.5, S2=7.5, S3=10.5, S4=13.5 and S5=16.5) were evaluated for biomass production. A green-house experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with three replications. Analysis of variance indicated high differences among the genotypes and salinity levels. Biomass production decreased with increasing salinity level and MBS8712 genotype showed better performance than other genotypes. Due to significant genotype × salt effect, for assessing genotypes reaction in salt levels some stability parameters were used. Most of the stability methods indicated that the 4Shori genotype was the most phenotypically stable with above-average performance. The results revealed both potential and performance under stress with stability should be considered simultaneously to take advantage of the selection desirable genotypes for stress tolerance.

Anley W, Habtamu Z, Yigzaw D. 2013. Genotype X environment interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) across North Western Ethiopia. J. Plant Breed. Crop Science 5, 171-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2013.0406

Ashraf M, Harris PJC. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. plant science. 166, 3-16.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.02.4

Becker HC, Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding. 101: 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14390523.1988.tb00261.x

Eberhart SA, Russell WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties, Crop Science. 6, 36-40.

Elakhdar A, Abd El-sattar M, Amer K, Kumamaru T. 2016. Genetic  diversity  and  association  analysis  among  Egyptian  barley  (Hordeum  vulgare  L.) genotypes with different adaptations to saline conditions analyzed by SSR markers.  Australian Journal of Crop Science 10, 637-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.05.p7331

Ferreira D, Demetrio C. 2006. Statistical models in agriculture: biometrical methods for evaluating phenotypic stability in plant breeding. CERNE. 12: 373-388.

Fritsche R, Borém A. 2005. Plant breeding for abiotic stress tolerance, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. 

Khalili M, Pour-Aboughadareh A. 2016. Parametric and non-parametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 18, 789-803

Mehari M, Alamerew S,  Lakew B,  Yirga H,  Tesfay M. 2014. Parametric Stability Analysis of Malt Barley Genotypes for Grain Yield in Tigray, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10, 210-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjas.2014.10.5.1822

Mohammadi R, Mahmoodi KN. 2008. Stability analysis of grain yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). internationa journal of plant breeding. 2, 74-78.

Sabaghnia N, Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R. 2013. Yield stability of performance in multi-environment trials of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) genotypes. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 87, 787-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361030787

Turhan A, Seniz V. 2012. Salt tolerance during vegetative growth in cross of tomato and effect of cytoplasm in response to salt tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 207-218.

Verma MM, Chahal GS, Murty BR. 1978. Limitations of conventional regression analysis: a proposed modification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 52, 89-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00817837

Wricke G. 1962. A method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Z. Pfl.-zucht. 47, 92–96.

Related Articles

An investigation of phytochemical constitutents and pharmacological activities of Strobilanthes andamanensis leaf extract

Deepika, V. Ambikapathy, S. Babu, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 86-94, October 2025.

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.