Considerable effect of sowing dates and cultivars on the nutritional and functional properties of Mung Bean (Vigna Radiata)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2017
Views (993)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Considerable effect of sowing dates and cultivars on the nutritional and functional properties of Mung Bean (Vigna Radiata)

Muhammad Umair Raza, Gulam Qadir, Zahid Mahmood, Tariq Rafique, Muhammad Asad, Muhammad Awais Tariq, Wajiha Anum
Int. J. Biosci. 10(2), 29-36, February 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Different sowing dates affect the growth and development of crop plants due to change in climatic conditions. The main objective of this study is to characterize mung bean cultivars for protein concentration and to determine high yielding mung bean genotypes with its ability of maximum protein synthesis under different sowing dates. A field experiment was conducted at the two locations in Pakistan one experimental area being the NARC (Islamabad) whereas the second experimental area was the Koont farm (Chakwal). The experiment was laid out in RCBD factorial design with three replications. Sowing dates on the main plot and cultivars on the sub plots, three sowing dates viz., 28 June, 8 July and 16 July and three cultivars viz. AZRI-06, NM-06 and NM-11 were used in the experiment. Late sowing in July was produced maximum yields (851.56 kg ha-1) and protein contents. AZRI-06 was produced maximum potential yield (911 kg ha-1) in the prevailing arid conditions of both locations. It appears to be well adapted to the agro-ecologiical conditions of both Islamabad and Chakwal. Moreover, the use of AZRI-06 is suggested in arid conditions where soils are loam and sandy loam with arid environmental conditions.

Asghar A, Chaudhry AM, Tanveer A. 2006. Response of mung bean (Vagina radiate L.) genotypes to rhizobia culture. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 37, 1-2.

Aslam M, Mahmood IA, Sultan T, Ahmad S. 2000. Inoculation approach to legume crops and their production assessment in Pakistan-A Review. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2, 193-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.193.195

Association of Official Analytical Chemists, & Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (US). 1920. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (Vol. 2). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

Ayub M, Tanveer A, Choudhry MA, Amin MMZ, Murtaza G. 1999. Growth and yield response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) cultivars to varying levels of nitrogen. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 4, 1380-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.193.195

Bilal M. 1994. Effect of sowing dates on growth and yield of three varieties of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) (Doctoral dissertation, MSc. Thesis. Deptt. Agron. University of Agriculture Faisalabad).

Chandel KP, Joshi SB, Arora KR, Part KC. 1978. Riceban: A new pulse with high potential. Indian farming, 28, 19-22.

Dhuppe MV, Madrap IA, Chandankar GD, More SS. 2005. Correlation and path analysis in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezeck). Journal of Soils and Crops 15, 84-89.

Gebologlu N, Ece A, Yazgan A. 1996. The effects of different sowing periods on the agronomic characteristics of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in the ecological conditions of Tokat/Turkey. In I Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes 462 259-266 P.

Govt. of Pakistan. 2013-14. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2013-14. Govt. of Pakistan, Economic trade and investment wing, Islamabad, 30 P.

Green CF, Paulson GA, Ivins JD. 1985. Time of sowing and the development of winter wheat. Journal  of Agricultural Sciences 105, 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600055921

Hozayn M, Zeidan MS, El-Salam MA. 2007. Performance of some Mungbean (Vignna radiate L.) genotypes under late sowing condition in Egypt. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 6: 972-978.

Jan A, Taj FH, Khan IA, Khan N. 2002. Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of Mashbean varieties. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.622.624

Kannaiyan S. 1999. Bioresources technology for sustainable agriculture. Associated Publishing Company.

Khan A, Khalil SK. 2010. Effect of leaf area on dry matter production in aerated mung bean seed. International Journal of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 4, 52-61.

Khan A, Malik MA. 2001. Ditermining the biological yield potential of different Mungbean (Vigna radiata. L) cultivars. Journal of Biological Sciences 1, 575-576. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2001.575.576

Khan M, Malik MA, Saleem M, Cheema MA, Ahmad ABRAR. 2000. Effect of different seeding times and seed rates on the growth yield and quality of rice bean. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2, 104-106.

Khan S, Shah S, Akbar H. 2001. Effect of planting geometry on yield and yield components in Mungbean. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture (Pakistan).

Khattak GSS, Ashraf M, Saeed I, Alam, B. 2006. A new high yielding mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) variety” Ramzan” for the agro climatic conditions of NWFP. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38, 301.

Maqsood M, Hassan MU, Iftikhar M, Mehmood MT. 2001. Effect of different levels of phosphorus on agronomic traits of two mash bean genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science 38, 81-3.

Pun L, Villareal RL. 1989. Inter-relationships and path coefficient of some quantitative traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek) under post-rice growing conditions. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 14, 91-95.

Rainey KM, Griffiths PD. 2005. Inheritance of heat tolerance during reproductive development in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of the American. Society for Horticulture Science 130, 700-706.

Rehman A, Khalil SK, Nigar S, Rehman S, Haq I, Akhtar S, Shah SR. 2009. Phenology, plant height and yield of Mungbean varieties in response to planting date. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 25, 147-151.

Sarkar MAR, Kabir MH, Begum M, Salam MA. 2004. Yield performance of Mungbean as affected by planting date, variety and plant density. Journal of Agronomy 3, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.18.24

Singh J, Mathur N, Bohra S, Bohra A, Vyas A. 2006. Comparative performance of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties under rainfed condition in Indian Thar desert. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 1, 48-50.

Steel RG, Torrie JH. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. Principles and procedures of statistics.

Tzudir L, Bera PS, Chakraborty PK. 2014. Impact of temperature on the reproductive development in mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) varieties under different dates of sowing. International Journal of Bio-resources and Stress Managment 5, 194-199. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4038.2014.00555.7

Vange T, Obi IU. 2006. Effect of planting date on some agronomic traits and grain yield of upland rice varieties at Makurdi, Benue state, Nigerian Journal of Sustainable development in agriculture and environment 2, 1-9.

Webb C, Hawtin G. 1981. Press, Minneapolis. Lentils Common Wealth Agricultural Bureau and ICARDA.

Yan-sheng L, Qiu-ying Z, Qing-lu Gao S, Herbert J, Hashemi A. 2010. Influence of sowing date on phonological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in North-eastern USA. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 2556-2562.

Yoldas F, Esiyok D. 2007. Effects of sowing dates and cultural treatments on growth, quality and yield of processing beans. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10, 2470-2474. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.2470.2474

Related Articles

Intra-population genetic diversity modeling of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) population in Niger

Adamou Ibrahim Maman Laouali*, Zango Oumarou, Alio Moussa Abdourazak, Rafiou Abdoulaye, Idi Saidou Sani, Idi Garba Nana Mariama, Bakasso Yacoubou, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 62-70, September 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous Trichoderma isolates against Fusarium wilt of cotton in Tanzania: In vitro screening and screen-house validation

Fauzia Khalid Mpiganzila*, Alfonce Leonard, Lidia Munuo, Ernest Mbega, Agatha Aloyce, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 44-61, September 2026.

In vitro study of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic activity of medicinal plants

T. K. Nishath*, P. Mathavi, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 32-43, September 2026.

Association between the IL13 rs1800925 (-1112C/T) polymorphism and Schistosoma mansoni infection intensity in a population from western Côte d’Ivoire

Bernardin Ahouty Ahouty*, Abla Edwige Sokouri, Georges Bohoussou Kassi, Innocent Allépo Abé, Martial Kassi N’djetchi, Yaya Ouangbo Ouattara, Ornella Karmelle Lydia Dago, Mathurin Yao Koffi, Thomas Konan Konan, Mathurin N’Goran Koffi, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 20-31, September 2026.

Abattoir-based surveillance reveals geographic clustering and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in Tanzania

Yohana Siyajali Anatory*, Beatus Lyimo, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Joram Buza, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 11-19, September 2026.

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.